Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AGAINST ISLAM
Live Leak ^ | April 19, 2008 | Live Leak

Posted on 04/20/2008 10:47:33 AM PDT by DogByte6RER

PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AGAINST ISLAM

A Proposed Constitutional Amendment

(Note the need for this Amendment at the end)

Background and justification to Amendment 28 (self-defense/survival measure)

Whereas; Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;

Whereas; the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a 'religious test' for participation in the body politic;

Whereas; Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supercedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;

Whereas; Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;

Whereas; Saudi Arabia , the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even 'moderate' Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;

Whereas; Islam includes as its basic tenant the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;

Whereas; on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;

Whereas; representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;

Whereas; there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;

Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.

Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:

Article I

The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion. The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.

Article II

As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.

Article III

Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress.

No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.

The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.

The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and death as proscribed by Congress.

Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death. Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States .

Article IV

Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: absurd; amendment; antiamerican; constitution; culturewar; ignorant; islam; islamofascism; muhammadsminions; muslims; religionofpeace; rop; terrorism; theenemywithin; tyranny; westernciv; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: Morgana; All

Ok pal, what do we do for those practice islam here??? Kick them out of the country including those who was born here???


22 posted on 04/20/2008 11:09:05 AM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

See that’s the rub. Liberty by necessity includes the freedom to speak against liberty.


23 posted on 04/20/2008 11:09:32 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Melas; All

To me they are different from the Taliban...


25 posted on 04/20/2008 11:10:15 AM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: DogByte6RER
As much as I abhor mahommadanism, I have to say a vehement NO!

Christianity is already in the crosshairs of fedgov types who would love to kill it.

If we openly give them the power to restrict one system of belief, even one as repugnant and vile as mohammedanism, they will take that inch and run a marathon with it. No religion will be safe from the sweeping gaze and power of the federal government once they get the lumbering beast into motion.

So NO, fight the mohammedans with ferocity and fire if needs be, but do it on the field of battle, not in the arcane and morally bankrupt field of government fiat because we will all suffer.

Once the iron fist starts swinging, it is indiscriminating and relentless.

27 posted on 04/20/2008 11:11:25 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; All

Even if they did no harm??? So the people who play professional football who are muslim should be sent to Gitmo???


28 posted on 04/20/2008 11:11:31 AM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Hell, I’m for killing all the terrorists. That’s a different story. I’m for killing all the Christians who turn out to be terrorists too. Which has happened btw with a few Irish folks in days past.

I’m all for put an end to mass murderers. That’s not quit the same thing as calling to burn the practitioners of a religion out of their homes and churches though is it?


29 posted on 04/20/2008 11:12:10 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg; All

It is called slippery slope...


30 posted on 04/20/2008 11:12:23 AM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Hate to see the need.

But I’d vote for it.

Of course, the globalists will not allow it to pass.


31 posted on 04/20/2008 11:12:40 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Quix; All

I know living in a free society is so overrated.


33 posted on 04/20/2008 11:13:38 AM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I can’t tell if you’re trying to pick a fight or get banned. I can’t take your seriously, that’s for sure. You have to be smarter than to accuse a Freeper of cheering when the towers fell.


34 posted on 04/20/2008 11:14:15 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
It is called slippery slope...

In this case, it would be yawning abyss.
35 posted on 04/20/2008 11:14:28 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: KevinDavis
"agree.. If the Government bans one religion, what makes you think that the Government is just going to stop at Islam?? Nope... Once you give the Government more power, they are not going to give up that power.."

Because Christianity is protected in our constitution. Further, there is no separation of church and state written anywhere in the constitution. The constitution simply states that the government shall not interfere with the church, make no law in rspect of the church.

separation of church and state is actually a connon law of the church, where the government runs the nations business, while the church runs it's business and is responsible for the morality of society.

Restricting the teaching of the bible in schools or public preaching of the bible is actually a violation of our constitution.

37 posted on 04/20/2008 11:15:22 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: djf

While this Amendment directly addresses islam, I believe we do need an Amendment or law that clearly states what is considered a valid religion in general. We need one that also addresses the Farrakans and the Wrights of this nation. They are using their so called religions as tax shelters and this has to stop.


38 posted on 04/20/2008 11:15:42 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I wonder if this is being proposed by the same people who sent the petition against Mitt Romney to John McCain.


39 posted on 04/20/2008 11:15:42 AM PDT by Eva (CHANGE - the new euphemism for Marxist revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg; All

To be honest, I’m not a fan of islam, however, it is dangerous to give the Federal Government more power to ban a religion.


40 posted on 04/20/2008 11:15:46 AM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson