Skip to comments.
Jet Streams Are Shifting And May Alter Paths Of Storms And Hurricanes
Science Daily ^
| 4-17-2008
| Carnegie Institution
Posted on 04/17/2008 2:03:00 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
1
posted on
04/17/2008 2:03:02 PM PDT
by
blam
To: NautiNurse
2
posted on
04/17/2008 2:03:41 PM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
To: blam
I’m sorry, I can’t get past the tittle.
Is changing the path of storms a problem?
If so, why?
It is more important that there are storms to release energy and not necessarily where they go.
4
posted on
04/17/2008 2:09:39 PM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(I get a GrandSon - Down with big brother.)
To: blam
BRING IT ON! We need the work. ;-)
5
posted on
04/17/2008 2:09:59 PM PDT
by
Normal4me
To: blam
Jet Streams Are Shifting And May Alter Paths Of Storms And Hurricanes
Hurricane Andrew. Storm paths in North America are likely to shift northward as a result of the jet stream changes. Hurricanes, whose development tends to be inhibited by jet streams, may become more powerful and more frequent as the jet streams move away from the sub-tropical zones where hurricanes are born. (Credit: NOAA)
ScienceDaily (Apr. 17, 2008) The Earth's jet streams, the high-altitude bands of fast winds that strongly influence the paths of storms and other weather systems, are shifting--possibly in response to global warming. Scientists at the Carnegie Institution determined that over a 23-year span from 1979 to 2001 the jet streams in both hemispheres have risen in altitude and shifted toward the poles. The jet stream in the northern hemisphere has also weakened. These changes fit the predictions of global warming models and have implications for the frequency and intensity of future storms, including hurricanes.
Cristina Archer and Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution's Department of Global Ecology tracked changes in the average position and strength of jet streams using records compiled by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, the National Centers for Environmental Protection, and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. The data included outputs from weather prediction models, conventional observations from weather balloons and surface instruments, and remote observations from satellites.
Jet streams twist and turn in a wide swath that changes from day to day. The poleward shift in their average location discovered by the researchers is small, about 19 kilometers (12 miles) per decade in the northern hemisphere, but if the trend continues the impact could be significant. "The jet streams are the driving factor for weather in half of the globe," says Archer. "So, as you can imagine, changes in the jets have the potential to affect large populations and major climate systems."
Storm paths in North America are likely to shift northward as a result of the jet stream changes. Hurricanes, whose development tends to be inhibited by jet streams, may become more powerful and more frequent as the jet streams move away from the sub-tropical zones where hurricanes are born.
The observed changes are consistent with numerous other signals of global warming found in previous studies, such as the widening of the tropical belt, the cooling of the stratosphere, and the poleward shift of storm tracks. This is the first study to use observation-based datasets to examine trends in all the jet stream parameters, however.
"At this point we can't say for sure that this is the result of global warming, but I think it is," says Caldeira. "I would bet that the trend in the jet streams' positions will continue. It is something I'd put my money on."
The results are published in the April 18 Geophysical Research Letters.
Adapted from materials provided by Carnegie Institution, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
They can't say for sure this is related to global warming. They can't say for sure it will continue. They can't say for sure it will alter storm patterns.
This fits the pattern of the global warming hysteria to a tee.
6
posted on
04/17/2008 2:10:27 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
To: blam
Looks like Rove took his weather machine with him when he left.
7
posted on
04/17/2008 2:11:14 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: blam
Agenda driven "research". If they didn't blame "global warming", the "research" grant wouldn't be funded.
8
posted on
04/17/2008 2:11:16 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: blam
OMG, we’re all gonna DIE!!!!!!!
Oh, wait, never mind, that’s GW that is going to kill us all in about 9 years (according to OwlGore!). This is a non-news story ordinary occurrence since the jet streams have long since been known to be “steering winds”.
But, OTOH, as OwlGore and Dr. William Gray have shown, we’re supposed to have more and more powerful hurricanes so (panic rising in voice) that means that there will be MORE hurricanes (more panic in voice) going north and . . . . . . . . OMG, we’re all gonna DIE!!!!!
9
posted on
04/17/2008 2:11:24 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: blam
Yeah, if we only signed Kyoto, all these big bad hurricanes will stop for good.
10
posted on
04/17/2008 2:12:04 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~***Just say NO to the "O"***~~~)
To: blam
I think its called WEATHER.
11
posted on
04/17/2008 2:12:38 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: DustyMoment

You need a gif. ;-)
12
posted on
04/17/2008 2:13:16 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~***Just say NO to the "O"***~~~)
To: blam
Carnegie Institution's Department of Global Ecology Given the name, expect everything is global warming.
To: blam
The poleward shift in their average location discovered by the researchers is small, about 19 kilometers (12 miles) per decade in the northern hemisphere, but if the trend continues the impact could be significant.Oh, goody: the continuity fallacy!
If the trend continues, in a century the jet stream will have shifted 120 miles to the north! In a couple or three millennia, it will have shifted all the way to the other side of the North Pole!
Okay, Mr. Scientist Guys: Will the trend continue? For how long? Are there any balancing mechanisms that will slow down or stop the trend? Or is this TEOTWAWKI (again)?
To: blam
Without any long term historical data on the patterns of the jet stream this is just more GW nonsense.
15
posted on
04/17/2008 2:15:06 PM PDT
by
saganite
To: HanneyBean
I bet my predictions for the next 10-15 years are as good as these guys...
I predict that the hurricane patterns during the next decade-plus will be statistically indistinguishable in track and intensity to the pattern experienced from 1930-1945: the last time the Atlantic MultiDecadal Oscillation was in a “warm phase”, as it is now. That is, “global warming” will have absolutely zero scientifically discernible effect.
16
posted on
04/17/2008 2:15:26 PM PDT
by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
To: blam
I have a feeling this is related to the fact they can not explain the few number of tropical storms in the last few years.
The weather fear mongers told us that the south east would be hit with more and more katrinia type storms.. and low and behold the number and strength storms returned to a pre Katrinia level.
So much so last year they labeled a storm near alaska as a “tropical” storm .
These folks need to relax and realize the earth has always had periods of change.
Gee in the 70s ( I think it was) we were told global cooling would lead to a new ice age...
To: ears_to_hear
18
posted on
04/17/2008 2:17:45 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: blam
From the article:
The Earth's jet streams, the high-altitude bands of fast winds that strongly influence the paths of storms and other weather systems, are shifting--possibly in response to global warming.
These changes fit the predictions of global warming models and have implications
The Earth's jet streams, the high-altitude bands of fast winds that strongly influence the paths of storms and other weather systems, are shifting--possibly in response to global warming.
Could it be that the purpose of this article is to push the Global Warming agenda?
19
posted on
04/17/2008 2:21:14 PM PDT
by
preacher
(A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
To: saganite
Agreed, I just read that the Gulf Stream is 80-150 miles wide. So a 12-24 mile shift in the Gulf Stream doesn’t seem to be statistically significant over a period of just 23 years.
20
posted on
04/17/2008 2:22:38 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson