Jimmuh (Carter) Goes On Surrender Tour Of Mideast To Remind America Why Not To Vote Dem This Year

Strata Sphere ^ | April 15th, 2008 | AJStrata

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Man, is Jimmy Carter really a GOP Mole working undercover all these decades? His one term debacle as President launched much of the Islamo Fascist terrorist movement we see today. But his policies brought us Ronald Reagan and the conservative movement for two decades (minus a small nostalgic dalliance with the Dems from 1992-1994 and 2006-2008). Carter and Clinton did more to make the right look good, by comparison, than most people appreciate.

And here Carter is again out on the road reminding Americans what a Surrendercrat does - he coddles and legitimizes brutal terrorists by giving them audience, with full physical embrace (as well as political embrace through his presence):

Former President Jimmy Carter embraced a leading Hamas figure Tuesday, according to participants in a meeting that infuriated Israeli officials already upset by Carter’s freelance Mideast peace mission.

Carter also laid a wreath at the grave of Yasser Arafat, whom the Bush administration and many Israelis blame for the breakdown of peace talks seven years ago and the violence that followed.

At a reception in the West Bank town of Ramallah organized by Carter’s office, the former president hugged Nasser Shaer, a senior Hamas politician, meeting participants said. Embraces between men are a common custom in Arab culture.

“He gave me a hug. We hugged each other, and it was a warm reception,” Shaer told The Associated Press. “Carter asked what he can do to achieve peace between the Palestinians and Israel … and I told him the possibility for peace is high.”

For terrorist peace is one surrender and cut-and-run by America away. Why is Carter giving presidential meetings to terrorists who don’t deserve even entry into this country of ours? Is he the useful idiot of Hamas as some have claimed?

Muhammad Nazzal, an Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) terror group official in Syria, told the Associated Press that Carter had sent an envoy to Damascus requesting a meeting with their exiled leader Mashaal. Hamas “Welcomed the request.”

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said of Carter’s meeting, “US government policy is that Hamas is a terrorist organization and we don’t believe it is in the interest of our policy or in the interest of peace to have such a meeting.” Assistant secretary of state David Welch spoke with the 82-year-old Carter before his trip and asked him not to meet any representative of Hamas.

No it is not. If you cannot pass a security check to enter this country your not the kind of person we should be negotiating with. In fact, we should be hunting you down. Carter is an old fool but he is providing America an important foil between McCain and the two Surrendercrats opposing him. We can waste time talking to terrorists as they plot to kill thousands of us or we can eliminate them before they can attack. Carter is showing us the foolishness and naiveté of the Surrendercrats which, in the end, leave terrorists alive and well and safe from our justice. And on the other side of we have Crocker, Petraeus and Bush showing us how to destroy the terrorists and bring democracy and hope to the region, leaving terrorist very little to survive off of.

This choice doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out.

[roses of sharon]

Who is paying for this trip?

Who is paying for his security?

[april15Bendovr]

MRI of Jimmy Carters head

[UKrepublican]

I’m not an American, but I think I understand your great country pretty well, and I have a feeling today millions of Americans will be feeling great shame that their former president, albeit an enormous failure actually embraced a man that is part of an organisation that openly targets innocent people, including of course little children, an organisation that actualy USES children to carry out their evil actions.

If there is any justice at all - that despicable little bastard Jimmy Carter will surely burn in hell along with the terrorists he embraces.

[pepsionice]

Imagine the return of Jimmy to the US. First, the Israel government basically declined any significant meetings, period. So there was nothing to chat on or get from them. The Hamas guys were the only group chatting from Jimmy on the other side...so it would appear he had no talks with the PLO folks...who hate the Hamas guys and want no peace deal which involves the Hamas. So Jimmy arrives back into the US....to discover that no member of the state department wants to have any conversation with him. Other than a couple of senators...the whole trip was of zero gain.

[sheik yerbouty]

Well said!

[Rapscallion]

If there is any justice at all - that despicable little bastard Jimmy Carter will surely burn in hell along with the terrorists he embraces.

Now, now, please don't hold back your true feelings.

[jpl]

MRI of Jimmy Carters head

ROFL, that's hilarious.

To be competely accurate, the MRI should have a little swastika in there too.

[Dick Bachert]

Back around 1975, Senator Frank Church held hearings on the operation of the CIA and found that -- HORRORS -- taxpayer money was being paid to foreign citizen snitches who had CRIMINAL RECORDS for vital human, on-the-ground intel on the activities of those who were planning the destruction of this country. Church commented at one session that "Gentlemen do not read other gentlemens’ mail." Interesting how Church and his fellow Dimocraps viewed men who would destroy America “gentlemen.” Glad that a**hole didn't serve during the run-up to WWII. (Although he may have handled the "delayed" communication to Pearl Harbor that the Japanese were on the way!)

When he became president, Jimmy Carter fully supported and enforced the Church Amendment. The sorts of people who consort with -- and, more importantly, get cozy with -- the leaders of terrorist organizations are not normally choir boys. Church moved the legislature to PROHIBIT any US funds going to these potential informants. Since it can take upwards of 20 years for these guys to move close enough to the top to be seriously valuable, we had virtually NO humintel on bin Laden's plans for 9-11!

While there are still Church-like imbeciles (Reid, Pelosi, et come to mind) at the levers of power here, I THINK the law has been changed.

While the NSA wiretaps and eavesdrops on US citizens HERE, isn't it comforting to know that in just 15 or 20 years we may be able to thwart a plan hatched THERE for some future 9-11 with information gathered THERE.

Anybody else see a pattern here?

[roses of sharon]

Contact Information: The Carter Center

Mailing Address:
The Carter Center
One Copenhill
453 Freedom Parkway
Atlanta, GA 30307

Phone:
(404) 420-5100 or (800) 550-3560

E-mail:
carterweb@emory.edu

[djpg]

Jimmy Carter embracing Hamas leaders reminds me of Leonard Bernstein embracing members of the Black Panthers at his party for them.

Now we have Islamic Terrorist Radical Chic.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

It’s difficult to imagine they are so blatantly antiAmerican!

See this :

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left

And a review:

**********************************

By	Kat Bakhu (Albuquerque, NM United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)

I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.

It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.

Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.

This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air.

[jmaroneps37]

Surrender tour is exactly what it is.