Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2008 9:46:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Who is paying for this trip?

Who is paying for his security?


2 posted on 04/15/2008 9:48:52 AM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
MRI of Jimmy Carters head


3 posted on 04/15/2008 9:50:00 AM PDT by april15Bendovr (Free Republic & Ron Paul Cult = oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’m not an American, but I think I understand your great country pretty well, and I have a feeling today millions of Americans will be feeling great shame that their former president, albeit an enormous failure actually embraced a man that is part of an organisation that openly targets innocent people, including of course little children, an organisation that actualy USES children to carry out their evil actions.

If there is any justice at all - that despicable little bastard Jimmy Carter will surely burn in hell along with the terrorists he embraces.


4 posted on 04/15/2008 9:59:21 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Back around 1975, Senator Frank Church held hearings on the operation of the CIA and found that -- HORRORS -- taxpayer money was being paid to foreign citizen snitches who had CRIMINAL RECORDS for vital human, on-the-ground intel on the activities of those who were planning the destruction of this country. Church commented at one session that "Gentlemen do not read other gentlemens’ mail." Interesting how Church and his fellow Dimocraps viewed men who would destroy America “gentlemen.” Glad that a**hole didn't serve during the run-up to WWII. (Although he may have handled the "delayed" communication to Pearl Harbor that the Japanese were on the way!)

When he became president, Jimmy Carter fully supported and enforced the Church Amendment. The sorts of people who consort with -- and, more importantly, get cozy with -- the leaders of terrorist organizations are not normally choir boys. Church moved the legislature to PROHIBIT any US funds going to these potential informants. Since it can take upwards of 20 years for these guys to move close enough to the top to be seriously valuable, we had virtually NO humintel on bin Laden's plans for 9-11!

While there are still Church-like imbeciles (Reid, Pelosi, et come to mind) at the levers of power here, I THINK the law has been changed.

While the NSA wiretaps and eavesdrops on US citizens HERE, isn't it comforting to know that in just 15 or 20 years we may be able to thwart a plan hatched THERE for some future 9-11 with information gathered THERE.

Anybody else see a pattern here?

9 posted on 04/15/2008 10:19:45 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Jimmy Carter embracing Hamas leaders reminds me of Leonard Bernstein embracing members of the Black Panthers at his party for them.

Now we have Islamic Terrorist Radical Chic.


11 posted on 04/15/2008 10:24:33 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Surrender tour is exactly what it is.


13 posted on 04/15/2008 11:52:19 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson