Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trading Nude Photos Via Mobile Phone Now Part of Teen Dating, Experts Say
Fox News ^ | 14 April 2008 | AP

Posted on 04/14/2008 6:33:21 AM PDT by batter

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Forget about passing notes in study hall; some teens are now using their cell phones to flirt and send nude pictures of themselves.

The instant text, picture and video messages have become part of some teens' courtship behavior, police and school officials said.

The messages often spread quickly and sometimes find their way to public Web sites.

"I've seen everything from your basic striptease to sexual acts being performed," said Reynoldsburg police Detective Brian Marvin, a member of the FBI Cyber Crime Task Force of Central Ohio. "You name it, they will do it at their home under this perceived anonymity."

Westerville Central High School senior Jerome Ray said he's received such unsolicited messages, including one from a classmate while he was sitting with his girlfriend.

"A lot more girls are aggressive," said Ray, 18. "Some girls are crazy and they are putting themselves out there."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: clintonlegacy; dating; immorality; moralabsolutes; society; teens; threadjack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
We've had the same problem here in Utah. A Jr. High in Farmington had a bunch of kids busted for the same stuff. It would be a good idea to block picture and video messaging from you child's phone.

The end quote of the article sums it up well - "They don't see anything wrong with it," he said. "It leaves me speechless."

1 posted on 04/14/2008 6:33:22 AM PDT by batter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: batter

Hard core porn is becoming way too common and nearly acceptable behavior. You’ve come a long ways baby.


2 posted on 04/14/2008 6:35:17 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Not only blocking the image stuff, put it would also be helpful if parents would act as parents (instead of being 'best friends') and talk to their kids about appropriate behavior (and consequences).

Seems a lot of kids just have no moral compass whatsoever.

3 posted on 04/14/2008 6:36:46 AM PDT by batter (The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

Isnt this child pornography?


4 posted on 04/14/2008 6:37:25 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter
We hear about cases in which a kid in Kindergarten slaps a classmate's butt and is branded a sex offender (this just happened). I'm wondering when some Junior High kids will start serving time in prison for distribution of child pornography.

I don't like zero tolerance stupidity, but I fail to see how pictures of naked students can NOT be a legal violation.

5 posted on 04/14/2008 6:40:30 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

We are in the end times-—that’s all I can think of to explain something like this.


6 posted on 04/14/2008 6:40:31 AM PDT by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Since it is perpetrated by minors, prosecution depends on the jurisdiction. Posting the images on the web (or sending them to adults), however, would, probably, elevate the charges as your are then distributing the images to adults.


7 posted on 04/14/2008 6:40:32 AM PDT by batter (The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: batter

And we had to go to National Geographic for pics.


8 posted on 04/14/2008 6:41:09 AM PDT by SouthTexas (If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


9 posted on 04/14/2008 6:42:12 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter
Since it is perpetrated by minors, prosecution depends on the jurisdiction. Posting the images on the web (or sending them to adults), however, would, probably, elevate the charges as your are then distributing the images to adults.

As far as the enforcement of the law is concerned, you may be right. But I have a real problem with laws (any laws) which are applied to "some folks" while others are given a pass. If the statutes on child pornography specifically say that distribution to kids is A-OK, then fine. But I suspect that the statutes do not contain any age demarcation at which child pornography is OK.

One law for all the people. No special classes.

10 posted on 04/14/2008 6:47:22 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Isnt this child pornography?

Interesting question, isn't it.

Is it child pornography if the child in question takes the picture BY THEMSELVES, with no coercion, and then sends the picture UNSOLICITED to others?????

I'm against kiddie porn as much as the next guy, but if a 16 going on 25 Britney Spears wannabe starts sending pictures of her private parts to a bunch of hormone-soaked teenage boys, then no, I don't think the boys should be prosecuted for kiddie porn, regardless of what some idiotic overly-broad law says. The girl, OTOH, should be subject to whatever corporal punishment she DOESN'T find "exciting".
11 posted on 04/14/2008 6:48:49 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: batter

We have Hollywood and feminism to thank for the destruction of our society.


12 posted on 04/14/2008 6:49:00 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter
Westerville Central High School

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This is a very upscale area. Surely, their schools would be considered a “good” schools.

Isn't it amazing how almost all of these school outrage stories are from schools that would be considered “good”....BUT...we all know that this in **not** happening in the “good” schools of the government school defenders on this message board. ( sarc)

13 posted on 04/14/2008 6:49:03 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

We had the Polaroid Swinger and a 8-cent first-class postage.


14 posted on 04/14/2008 6:49:21 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Also, I think here in Utah, the teens were charged with misdemeanors for lewdness (BUT, I don’t think any of the pictures were posted on the web or sent to an adult).


15 posted on 04/14/2008 6:50:08 AM PDT by batter (The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Isnt this child pornography?

Interesting question, isn't it.

Is it child pornography if the child in question takes the picture BY THEMSELVES, with no coercion, and then sends the picture UNSOLICITED to others?????

I'm against kiddie porn as much as the next guy, but if a 16 going on 25 Britney Spears wannabe starts sending pictures of her private parts to a bunch of hormone-soaked teenage boys, then no, I don't think the boys should be prosecuted for kiddie porn, regardless of what some idiotic overly-broad law says. The girl, OTOH, should be subject to whatever corporal punishment she DOESN'T find "exciting".
16 posted on 04/14/2008 6:50:36 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: batter

Kids don’t seem to care that many copies of these pics are kept in a variety of places. When they get to be adults, stuff like this will bite them.


17 posted on 04/14/2008 6:50:51 AM PDT by devane617 (My Kharma Ran Over Your Dogma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
We are in the end times-—that’s all I can think of to explain something like this.

Internet has made access to this kind of stuff just so easy. It is hard to believe just how many girls are willing to put themselves on tape doing this kind of stuff.

18 posted on 04/14/2008 6:50:53 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: batter

This is the post-Clinton generation. Their formative years were spent hearing about how sexual escapades are perfectly “normal”


19 posted on 04/14/2008 6:51:27 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas
And we had to go to National Geographic for pics

We had the Polaroid Swinger. That made for some interesting mail calls.
20 posted on 04/14/2008 6:53:42 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson