Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attn McCain Haters: SHUT Your Stinking TRAP! (Vanity)
skank the sock puppet ^ | 3/30/08 | Cinnamon Girl

Posted on 03/31/2008 8:36:23 AM PDT by Cinnamon Girl

By now, most McCain haters will have already skipped down to the comments section to post their expletives and tell me how it’s a free country and they have a 1st Amendment right, etc. to yammer on and on about how bad McCain sucks, totally missing the point of my post, again. But I’m here to tell you, in this free country, that in my opinion, you should SHUT YOUR STINKIN TRAP! To all you ingrates, rageaholics, and self-absorbed punks, WE KNOW YOU HATE MCCAIN. You can give yourself a rest now and stop posting on every single thread the same exact comments. I’m not going to name names, but I will if I have to. I think we all know by now who I’m talking about. The folks who post the same pictures and the same comments on EVERY SINGLE THREAD. We got it. You aren’t voting for McCain. Fine. Time to move on. Yes, that’s my opinion. You have had enough time to accept the reality that John Sidney McCain III, WAR HERO, is the Republican nominee. Some folks on FR have used this time to learn more about Johnny, realize that he isn’t as bad as they thought, grow up, act like adults, and get in gear to vote for him. Some of you have decided not only to beat your collective dead horse everyday, banging out the same tiresome gripes about McCain on every thread, but you’ve also gotten increasingly VITRIOLIC. I’m talking about the following trash:

1. Saying McCain isn’t really a war hero because (insert stupid lie here.)

2. Declaring that McCain urged the U.S. government to leave other POWs back in Vietnam (for what reason would he do this exactly? Don’t bother, I don’t want to hear your lies anymore.)

3. Insulting other FR posters who like or support Johnny by using profanity, vulgarity, and name calling. YOU ARE DIMINISHING FR with your hostile posts—this kind of stuff belongs on low rent leftie sites like DU, or Daily Kos, not FREE REPUBLIC, the shining star of conservative websites.

4. AND FINALLY, the filthiest load in the McCain Haters’ verbal trebuchet: wishing, hoping or praying that John Sidney McCain III would come to some misfortune which would prevent him from living to be President. THIS IS BY FAR THE MOST DISGUSTING. How can you wish that a decent, G-d fearing man who suffered and sacrificed out of love for this country, who, BY THE GRACE OF G-D, survived five years of torture and imprisonment only to return to service in the military—how could you wish him anything but a long, long life? Shameful. And don’t DARE try to suggest that you are any better in moral character or principle than the angry liberal scum who wish ill upon President Bush or our troops. If your definition of “conservative” is to rage daily and most repulsively against our next President, then please call me a “right wing Reaganite traditionalist” because I want no part of your scene. I realize that some talk show hosts like Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity don’t like Johnny, but I don’t recall hearing them praying for his untimely demise. No, that is the talk of the dregs of society, not adults who have their act together.

And just a heads up to all the McCain haters: I am ignoring your tirades henceforth. I can’t stop you from posting your garbage, but I certainly don’t have acknowledge it. Basically, the point of posts from people who like Johnny these days is to share daily news: tracking polls, statements he has made, who he is touring with, speeches he has given, leaders he has met with, etc. What is YOUR point? To seek out people to commiserate with? To insult fellow conservatives who’ve decided having a responsible leader in a time of war trumps giving the GOP a spanking? To try and rally others to joins the haters camp?

Are you going to do this for the next several years? If so, the best advice I can give to the non-haters is to wade through the rage and seek out the decent and the productive on FR. Do not waste your time debating the haters, because they seem to thrive on self-righteousness and rage. Try as they might, they have given absolutely no GOOD reason to allow a dem to win the presidency. Their continued daily rantings about why they hate McCain, on EVERY thread about him, only serve to define their insanity.

I seek out those of like mind. G-d Bless John Sidney McCain III.

P.S. McCain haters, please review the link in order to familiarize yourselves with the sound of Skank's voice so you can hear his directive in your head when you are about to post something vile.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: angermanagementissue; anticonservativepost; cinnamongirl; conservatives; conservatives4obama; democratsbestfriend; drone; feingold; gop; hypocracy; hypocrite; hypocriticalvanity; johnsidney; keating; liberal; liberalagenda; liberalmindset; liberalvalues; mcamnesty; mccain; mccainiacs; newmajority; rageaholics; reforminstitute; rino; rinolovers; rinosanity; rinoseverywhere; rmsp; skank; sloganeer; spartansixdelta; stolenstrawberries; takeabreath; vanity; yayanothervanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960961-976 last
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Thanks Kent. I appreciate it, and agree with the sentence you cut out.

During one debate McCain stated, “I was leading the way for Conservatism during the Reagan years.” Catching himself, he immediately stated, “I was a footsoldier in that battle.”

I guess it dawn on him as it did many others, if he was the leading the way, what was Reagan doing?

The guy sure has the Hillary Clinton ability to lie down pat, just like the good little leftie he is.


961 posted on 04/05/2008 9:34:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

McCain has said numerous times, and I believe him, it makes total sense - that the reason he opposed the tax cuts before was there were no accompanying cuts in spending, which is crucial. It’s like all those (Huckabee et al) who want the Fair Tax - it’d be great but ONLY if first, internal revenue tax is repealed. Otherwise, you just have a double-whammy. Now McCain’s looking at being in a position to have a real say on spending cuts, thus making the tax cuts legitimate. To all his critics, he understands a great deal more about economics than the opposition. BHO and HRC may understand in principle, but they don’t care, putting their own dangerous agendas ahead of the people’s good. (He does have to get straightened out on this big global warming/environmental commitment as a priority, though.)


962 posted on 04/06/2008 10:18:35 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

CC - you just said it all. The stakes are TOO HIGH. Amazing how blessed we are to live in a country where everyone is free to be spoiled, petulant, fight, complain, insult, etc. Our enemies who focus 24/7 on killing us love it, that which they could never understand. In a perfect (election) world, we’d always have an ideal candidate, thrilling in every way. (Ooh, ask BHO supporters). This is a dangerous time in history and the future of our freedom and continued existence is riding on us getting a grasp. Think it couldn’t get worse? It could, beyond imagination. Vote and vote seriously, it’s a tremendous privilege that our founding fathers fought and died for.


963 posted on 04/06/2008 10:35:32 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: llandres

"Mussssssst... vooooote... for liberalllllllll... with big 'R' next tooooo... his naaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmme..."

964 posted on 04/07/2008 1:55:34 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (McCain "conservatives" = hardcore liberals who nonetheless appreciate the occasional tax cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies]

To: llandres

WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC!!


965 posted on 04/07/2008 5:20:07 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
(and it is really, really funny that you're acting like Cato is out to get conservatives!)

Cato Institute is not conservative; it is libertarian. They are opposed to moral conservatism, to a significant degree.

966 posted on 04/08/2008 5:59:36 AM PDT by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Ahhh c'mon, tell us how you really feel.

Seriously, do you feel better now that you've vented your obvious frustrations? Sorry. Couldn't be helped. My psychology class just left to go to lunch.

I don't hate McCain but I do hate the fact that he has cloaked himself as a "conservative" while taking every opportunity to destroy & disrupt conservative causes and goals. He has shown by his voting history where he truly stands. I think he's sold his soul for a seat at the big table of power.

Having said all that, I'll still hold my nose and vote for him because while I think the results will be the same as a win for the RATS, I think the journey will take a little longer and offer a less jarring transition and thus allow me more time to get prepped to accept the inevitable.

967 posted on 04/08/2008 10:25:39 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Cato Institute is not conservative; it is libertarian. They are opposed to moral conservatism, to a significant degree.

I will respond to your other post when I have a little personal time...but this I will respond to right now because it is typical of your spin and/or inability to analyze political data that's right in front of your face. It's true the Cato Institute is libertarian and that as a social conservative I disagree with them on some issues. But Cato, while advancing libertarian ideas advance fiscal conservative ideas and oppose the nanny state, and it's for this reason that they dislike Huckabee.

I mean really...is it your contention that a bunch of Libertarians are going to have a problem with a guy who wants to kill the IRS and then promote small government? That would be like Kate Michelman opposing condom distribution. No, Huckabee is opposed by libertarians and many social conservatives like myself because he's a social progressive in the early 1900s sense of the word.

Cato named Huckabee one of the worst governors in the country over purely fiscal issues, not social ones. Spin all you want, but that's the truth.

968 posted on 04/08/2008 11:34:36 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

You have no grounds to say so. Neither do they. Only superficial factoids taken out of context, which don’t tell the story accurately. That is the kind of behavior that gives some conservatives the bad name of “reactionary.”


969 posted on 04/09/2008 3:17:08 PM PDT by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 968 | View Replies]

To: unspun
You have no grounds to say so. Neither do they. Only superficial factoids taken out of context, which don’t tell the story accurately. That is the kind of behavior that gives some conservatives the bad name of “reactionary.”

OK, prove it. Go get the Cato report and tell me what they said about Huckabee's fiscal performance that isn't true or is taken out of context. Then tell me why libertarians would oppose a guy who has a workable plan to destroy the IRS. You could also tell me why if all of this is a bunch of lies he couldn't give Romney a straight answer on taxes in four tries.

Oh, and the "reactionary" charge...did your women's studies professor put you up to that? One of the hallmarks of social conservatism is opposing vast social experiments, and sending everyone in America a check every month falls under that category for sure.

970 posted on 04/10/2008 9:36:44 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 969 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

I suggest they start their own website.

They can call it “wehateeveryonebutourguysoweregoingtopout.com”


971 posted on 05/14/2008 7:35:17 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Some people are like slinkys, the idea of them tumbling down a flight of stairs makes you smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

So you can justify John “Carbon Credit ALGORE” McCain.


972 posted on 05/14/2008 7:45:04 AM PDT by bmwcyle (I always rely on God and Guns in that order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 971 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

I’m not going to vote for McCain, but probably the worst thing for McCain is supporters like...you.


973 posted on 05/14/2008 7:48:01 AM PDT by Doohickey (SSN-681; SSN-671; SSN-669; SSN-712)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

He looks more like a Ragetard...


974 posted on 05/14/2008 7:53:33 AM PDT by Doohickey (SSN-681; SSN-671; SSN-669; SSN-712)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

He’s not perfect. I’m probably going to have to hold my nose on a variety of issues while I push his name on the Diebold Touchscreen.

The issue for me is who would be more detrimental to the country? Hillabama, or McCain? The answer for me is clear.


975 posted on 05/14/2008 9:13:33 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Some people are like slinkys, the idea of them tumbling down a flight of stairs makes you smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 972 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl; All

I have plenty of reason to hate John McCain. I don’t. I do hate what he has stood for most of his life. If you read about the guy, you realize he was a problem as a yute. He was a problem in his West Point and Navy training days.

He was a massive problem once he got out of the Navy.

So John, I don’t hate you. I just hate what you have been doing with most of your life.

Leave the management of our nation to people who are better grounded. Please.

http://www.hotr.us/mccain/mccainagain.html


976 posted on 10/26/2009 11:20:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960961-976 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson