1 posted on
03/27/2008 3:48:39 PM PDT by
kingattax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: kingattax
Good for Pelosi! She does not have to take crap from Hillary’s Fellow Traveling Goons.
To: kingattax
IOW...."Hillary, stick this up your a$$!" ".....you are so five minutes ago!"
3 posted on
03/27/2008 3:51:10 PM PDT by
Gaffer
To: kingattax
Somewhere in the backfield George Soros and other billionaries are wondering why they supported this idiot woman to the Speaker’s spot.
4 posted on
03/27/2008 3:51:29 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(su - | echo "All your " | chown -740 us ./base | kill -9 | cd / | rm -r | echo "belong to us")
To: kingattax
ALPHA B!TCH FIGHT!
Maybe HilLIARy and Nancy can BOTH lose...
6 posted on
03/27/2008 3:53:40 PM PDT by
Nervous Tick
(I'm not voting FOR John McCain -- I'm voting AGAINST Hillary/Obama)
To: kingattax
maybe she hasn’t noticed yet but the dems are already in trouble
I heard today on MSNBC that the obama statements are alright with the dem party but the republicans will try and attack obama with them
Now correct me if I’m wrong but the dems are in trouble and his statements haven’t sat well with many dems
clinton does have a good point, obama would probably lose PA, FL, NH, NJ,maybe MO IA in the general election
even massachusetts CT and ME might go for Mc cain too against obama
NJ especially after his preachers italian comment
be good for us though if obama got the nomination
7 posted on
03/27/2008 3:54:01 PM PDT by
manc
To: kingattax
Hitlery will not give up.
8 posted on
03/27/2008 3:54:10 PM PDT by
exnavy
( conservative, not republican)
To: kingattax
Catfights are never pretty, note to nancy’s doctor, stock up on Botox for Madame Speaker.
9 posted on
03/27/2008 3:54:41 PM PDT by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: kingattax
Hillary probably has the FBI files or any other government and personal files, plus family files, on just about all the superdelegates. So, with the supers having to decide between their deepest darkest secrets being publicized, their cat being Arkancided, or their significant other being “Fort Marcy Parked” and bucking Pelosi, I think they’ll choose bucking Pelosi. - If things don’t take a mysterious turn to hand Hillary the nomination (and the election), I’ll be the first to say I was wrong.
10 posted on
03/27/2008 3:54:52 PM PDT by
Twinkie
(TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT !!!)
To: kingattax
The Speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters, Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said in a statement late Wednesday. I thought the DNC came up with superdelegates in order to overturn "the will of the voters" if the voters failed to choose the best candidate...indicating they are aware of how dumb Dem voters can be!
11 posted on
03/27/2008 3:56:44 PM PDT by
lonestar
To: kingattax
Orville Redenbacher stock must be rising.
12 posted on
03/27/2008 3:57:39 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: kingattax
Unfortunately for Pelosi and Barack, Pelosi has no power over how superdelegates vote.
14 posted on
03/27/2008 4:01:36 PM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: kingattax
and the RATS, take another one in the..................HA ha!!!
18 posted on
03/27/2008 4:05:53 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: kingattax
WOW! A battle between "Queen Bees" and I'm betting on the Top Queen, Hillary.
Pelosi only thinks that she's in the driver's seat.
Hillary knows she holds all of the cards plus the Ace of Spades (FBI files, anyone?)
19 posted on
03/27/2008 4:06:52 PM PDT by
zerosix
(native sunflower)
To: kingattax
I'm waiting for them to fall fighting into the fountain, like what happened on Dynasty...
21 posted on
03/27/2008 4:16:45 PM PDT by
hunter112
(The 'straight talk express' gets the straight finger express from me.)
To: kingattax
But wasn’t overturning the ‘will of the voters’ the whole point of superdelegates? They were instituted in hope of preventing another McGovern debacle precisely because the demonRAT base is sometimes so out of step with the country as a whole that it hurts their party.
22 posted on
03/27/2008 4:19:02 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: kingattax
I think Pelosi has had her fill of kissing up to the Clintons and she’s not gonna’ take it any more....especially since she is now in a position to ‘hand it out’.
24 posted on
03/27/2008 4:22:49 PM PDT by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
To: kingattax
Pelosi doesn’t realize the purpose of the superdelegates. They exist for the DNC to make sure the final choice is acceptable to the DNC. Why have them otherwise?
27 posted on
03/27/2008 4:28:28 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: kingattax
...superdelegates should not overturn the will of the voters...ergo superdelegates are a useless artifact with no purpose, ie. Democrat Leaders.
To: kingattax
What Hillary needs is a good Reischtag fire.
34 posted on
03/27/2008 4:56:57 PM PDT by
RobRoy
(I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
To: kingattax
This letter is inappropriate and we hope the Clinton campaign will reject the insinuation contained in it. The odds of that outcome are on par with the odds of BHO asking for the $27k back that he donated to Rev Wright.
Rev Wright's hate church is on the moral equivalence of a white separatist church in northern Idaho.
35 posted on
03/27/2008 5:19:39 PM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson