Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?
Copyright © 2007 DaytonOS ^ | March 21 2008 | By Steven Rosenfeld

Posted on 03/23/2008 5:58:43 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

As Ohio election officials investigate illegal crossover voting in the 2008 primary, questions arise on Rush Limbaugh's role.

Limbaugh, the nation's top-rated talk radio host, was urging Republicans in Texas and Ohio to skip their party's primary on March 4 and instead cast a vote for Hillary Clinton in order to prolong the fight between her and Barack Obama.

What Limbaugh encouraged Republican voters to do in Ohio was a fifth-degree felony in that state, punishable with a $2,500 fine and six to 12 months in jail.

On Thursday, March 20, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the "Cuyahoga County Board of Election has launched an investigation that could lead to criminal charges against voters who maliciously switched parties for the March 4 presidential primary."

In 2008, 2.22 million Ohioans voted in the Democratic primary, compared to 1.27 million in 2000, according to unofficial results released by Brunner's office. In contrast, 1.01 million Ohioans voted in the 2008 Republican primary, compared to nearly 918,000 people in 2004.

Michael Slater of Project Vote, a nonpartisan group that designs voter registration drives for low-income people, said GOP meddling in the Ohio Democratic Primary was a clear-cut example of fraudulent voting, which is how Republicans have defined the issue in recent years, as GOP advocates have urged state legislatures and Congress to adopt anti-fraud measures such as tougher voter ID laws.

"Here we have a real instance of spurring people on to engage in illegal election activities with a real intent to affect the outcome," Slater said. "That is voter fraud. People were encouraged to break the law. They had to declare allegiance to a political party and sign a document under penalty of perjury. Intent is what matters in voter fraud."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: hillary; idiocy; indymediaheadline; jerimiahwright; mccain; nobama; obama; oh2008; operationchaos; oxycotin; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio; zotmenow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 521-523 next last
To: OCCASparky
>>>Good luck proving it. Find a voter who will state that they crossed party lines based solely on what Rush said. <<<

In order to implicate Rush, the State would have to prove the "mind numbed robot" syndrome exists and the voter was in its control; the voters free will did not enter into his decision at all!

Not likely - even in front of a Democrat judge.

341 posted on 03/23/2008 7:57:38 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

You’re welcome.


342 posted on 03/23/2008 7:58:31 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Anticommie

And, if you were to get your wish, what do you suppose would be the effect of silencing Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and other conservative voices? I remember what it was like before Rush, who pioneered the way for the conservative voices we hear today, and I have no wish to relive those days.

As to the election, there was little doubt in anyone’s mind that the next POTUS would be a Dem...before Operation Chaos.

Today there is talk that McCain is benefitting from all the chaos in the Dem Party. We’re hearing that he very well could win the presidency. If he can refrain from kissing up to liberals and attacking conservatives long enough to take advantage of that, he just might be the next POTUS. If he can’t, that isn’t Rush’s fault, or the fault of any other conservative. He’ll have no one to blame but himself, and we’ll end up with the Democrat POTUS that everyone thought we’d have in the first place.


343 posted on 03/23/2008 7:59:18 PM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Anticommie
Remember, this started before the Rev. Wright fiasco. Obama was rolling Hillary then. People are now talking about crossing over and voting for him. Tactics change. The goal doesn't. Besides, I'm told McCain has this thing locked up with all the “independents” and “moderates”
344 posted on 03/23/2008 7:59:30 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Beyond that, if the voter had to swear allegience to his new party, I doubt the law prescribes the duration of that allegience. The voter could simply say they have shifted allegience again.


345 posted on 03/23/2008 7:59:31 PM PDT by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: familyop

uhhmm ...okay.
And that get’s us all where?
I personally hope Hillary drowns in the Ummah with Huma.
You need to make your anger a positive thing somehow.
WE don’t ALSO NEED folks who see devastation only.


346 posted on 03/23/2008 7:59:49 PM PDT by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
What a bunch of whiners, eh?

No kidding...DemocRATs sniveling about 'voter fraud'....

LOL...

347 posted on 03/23/2008 8:00:15 PM PDT by O Neill (Aye, Katie Scarlett, the ONLY thing that lasts is the land...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Your comments are foolish at best.

Rush will not be indicted or even later convicted.

Given the fact that such open primaries were created to CREATE this type of action it is hardly legally sustainable.

The reason we hare having this coversation is the leftists who pursue Rush are agonized at his effectivness.

Remember if they get Rush they can easily get you and FR.


348 posted on 03/23/2008 8:00:38 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; All

looked all over rush’s site, can’t find the applications for the all-state mistress team

recently single, thought that i’d apply :)

anyone have a link?


349 posted on 03/23/2008 8:01:19 PM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

bump


350 posted on 03/23/2008 8:02:15 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murron
You are so right. I also believe that he despises McCain so much, and is so mad that the Democrats helped to get him the nomination, that this is payback for him. He would rather see Hillary than McCain. He figures he survived Bill Clinton for 8 years, he will survive her.

Wise opinion from an oldtimer against Limbough mania on this forum.

351 posted on 03/23/2008 8:02:24 PM PDT by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Shryke

The article is just a NYSlimes style scare tactic.

I bet rush creates a defese fund which when unspent goes to the marine scholarship fund.


352 posted on 03/23/2008 8:03:31 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Shryke

The article is just a NYSlimes style scare tactic.

I bet rush creates a defese fund which when unspent goes to the marine scholarship fund.


353 posted on 03/23/2008 8:03:48 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
“It’s Hillary. She called and said “Hi Rush. You know that little Freedom of the airwaves thing? Oh my what a silly thing to be concerned with. Wouldn’t you say? By the way, there’s this Reverend and...””

So, you're saying that Rush is responsible for breaking the Reverend Wright story??? Wrong, Mr. Horse. You can pin the blame on Brian Ross, of ABC News. I believe he received the "call" from Clinton Inc.

Hope your "flu" goes away soon.
354 posted on 03/23/2008 8:03:48 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
"Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?"

Sure. If the prosecutor wants to commit political suicide in exchange for a cozy job in DC compliments of the Clintons.

LOL. Harry Reid's smear letter that 41 senators signed didn't pan out too well for him. I doubt any prosecutor would want to try indict Rush for voter fraud.
355 posted on 03/23/2008 8:04:14 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: acapesket
"What has a Radio show EVER done to influence the Laws or Lawmakers of this country?"

Radio continues to push the same anti-family, anti-American bandwagon approaches pushed by television and print/Net. It's for all of the "just folks" (volks, even), who follow the current movement in power (citizens of the world, running corporations and related to teachers and bureaucrats). Moo!


356 posted on 03/23/2008 8:06:24 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Title: Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?"

GVnana: Sure. If the prosecutor wants to commit political suicide in exchange for a cozy job in DC compliments of the Clintons.

Behind Liberal Lines: Yeah, that's what they said about the guy who indicated Tom DeLay too. Didn't seem to hurt Ronnie Earl any.

GVnana: And you don't see a connection with my post? Oh! Wait a minute! You actually believe there's a case here?

357 posted on 03/23/2008 8:06:30 PM PDT by GVnana ("They're still analyzing the first guy. What do I have to worry about?" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Thanks. I was worried no one would notice this thread.

;-)


358 posted on 03/23/2008 8:06:49 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

LOL. If you aren’t a 24/7 subscriber, try emailing him at ElRushbo@eibnet.com .


359 posted on 03/23/2008 8:07:14 PM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Anticommie

“V Yes, but Rush makes much more money when Clintons are in Office, he admitted it openly in the past.
No, I do not listen to him anymore, I have better things to do than listening to somebody who claims being a conservative but openly enables Clintons.”

Well, Son, I have to go for it: Class warfare, Attacks on the epitome of Conservative talk radio, Irrational vituperation about someone trying to upset Obama’s chances, Not recognizing the danger of Obama at all-—not even mentioning him.

I believe you are a “skinny-legged” Obama Troll.

P.S. real conservatives don’t use “anti-commie” except in humor. You see, Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher brought down the Iron Curtain in the eighties.


360 posted on 03/23/2008 8:07:18 PM PDT by TFMcGuire (Either you are an American, or you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 521-523 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson