Posted on 03/13/2008 12:19:36 PM PDT by Red Badger
Washington, DCPresident Bush on March 5 at the Washington International Renewable Energy Conference (WIREC) called biodiesel the most promising renewable fuel for helping to meet renewable fuels standards.
The WIREC conference wraps up its four-day sessions that began March 3.
Here are a few of the ways biodiesel was highlighted.
"The legislation requires fuel producers to supply at least 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel in the year 2022," said President Bush.
"In other words, these just aren't goals, these are mandatory requirements.
"I'm confident the United States can meet those goals, and I know we must, for the sake of economic security, national security, and for the sake of being good stewards of the environment.
"Biodiesel is the most promising of these fuels.
"Biodiesel refineries can produce fuel from soybeans, and vegetable oils, and recycled cooking grease, from waste materials.
"All you out there with waste, you may be in business before you know it as this new technology kicks in.
"Most Americans -- or, more Americans -- are beginning to realize the benefits of biodiesel every year.
"Last year, we produced 450 million gallons of biodiesel.
"That's up 80 percent from 2006.
"Today there are more than 650 biodiesel fueling stations in America.
"There are hundreds of fleet operators that use biodiesel to fuel their trucks, and that's just the beginning of what is going to be a substantial change in our driving habits," said President Bush.
Equipment at the conference showed biodiesel in application.
Volvo Group, together with Mack® Trucks, featured trucks running on renewable fuels, including biodiesel, on the trade show exposition floor.
The truck running on biodiesel was manufactured in Dublin, VA.
President Bush also visited this exhibit, commenting on the "amazing joint venture with Mack and Volvo on these giant trucks that are using biodiesel to power them."
Manning Feraci, National Biodiesel Board VP of Federal Affairs, addressed conference attendees in a session yesterday.
The NBB also held a booth at WIREC. For more information, call Amber Thurlo Pearson at 800-841-5849.
It will be no pipe dream. Biotech companies are working on it today.
Subsidized pipedreams are still pipedreams
If the algae thing works, we should go for it. Meanwhile, we still need to drill and build.
vaudine
Like I said, we need to starve as many poor people as possible as quickly as possible, so go for it!
Let's show them once and for all how much America cares!
Go here and look at the charts. You will see that domestic production is going down at a steady rate.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/EneryCharts.cfm
The best we could hope for even if we leveled off consumption is that we keep the domestic from dropping as fast because all the time we are working to bring the new fields online the US production will continue to fall.
In the US and world wide proven reserves consumed have been outstripping new proven reserves since 1983.
In other words if we drill every well we know about it still would not keep up with consumption.
I'm convinced micro algae is the most promising source of renewable oil. It can optimally produce 15,000 gallons/acre/year, as opposed to corn (15 gallons/acre/year) or soybeans (48 gallons/acre/year). And it need not take one acre of productive farmland to do it.
I'm convinced that perpetual motion is the way to go.
It's even with algae in actual energy production right now.
That sounds great. But youre going to have to get that CornToEthanol bone out of the subsidies dog’s mouth
I think it is viable. Here in Orlando we have a lake, Lake Apopka, which is biologically dead, except that it’s filled with algae. That would be the perfect place to test this. I suspect that even though the lake is already polluted beyond belief, the environmentalists would object.
Speculation for ANWR, for instance, are all over the place, some extremely high. Given the geological history of the region, I would bet on the high.vaudine
Of all the alternatives in the mix, biodiesel, coal, more drilling, nuclear, photovoltaics, dry rock geothermal; and there IS plenty of energy, it certainly seems to me the ethanol route is the least worthy.
Problem is it's easy. And you know them Senators, whatever makes them a quick return, regardless of the science, well ---
And off the the Cape (Shadenfraude Teddy Baby), Under the Great Lakes and off the Coast of Florida for Starters.
Read the latest Issue of "Inprimus" and see what a Cluster-fornication Jane Fonda and Jimmy Carter caused us. Yes she killed Nuke Power, but Carter stopped Breeders so they can't reuse the fuel ergo giving us Y'ucca Mountain. France has them and stores their fuel in a closet the volume is so low.
Watch T Boone Pickens.
He is a one of many featured speakers at an upcoming Alternative Fuel Conference with a heavy emphasis on "Gaseous" Fuels. IMHO they are the near future not this Ethanol Crap.
Beam me up Scotty, there is no intelligent life in the Beltway.....
Sorry but I can't agree with that. In order to keep or increase our current standard of living any of these alternates will have to be exploited at a 10 to 1 minimum to replace oil. Oil is just that good of an energy source and it's going to start declining in the near future. Everything points to that.
ANWR will get drilled no matter what they say now.
When fuel gets tight enough Americans will scream for it to be done.
We can compare notes then. LOL
Maybe you should contact Shell and Chevron with your idea. Naive fools that they are, they've recently invested in algae production.
What is that a picture of?....
Borneo jungle being burned to make clearing for palm oil plantations to produce bio-fuel.
I heard you get about 50,000 miles per cow!
You also get about 72,000 miles per fuzzy kitten or puppy but of course using them for a fuel source is unacceptable because they aren't used for food or nutrition (at least not in America).
All kidding aside, I find it disturbing that food based fuels are gaining mega support without researching the global repercussions. Is it really more important to feed the fuel tank instead of the hungry citizenry with our food resources.
Maybe we should commit a zillion dollars to find a way to convert petroleum to food.
I saw on the news that in the Seattle area, bio-diesel is at $5.05 per gallon.
Wait! Peanuts can do it. Grow peanuts!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.