Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans aim to split Democrats on immigration
Chattanooga Times Free Press ^ | Thursday, March 13, 2008 | Herman Wang

Posted on 03/13/2008 7:00:37 AM PDT by Delacon

WASHINGTON — House Republicans are attempting a procedural move to force a vote on an immigration bill that could divide Democrats in an election year.

U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., is among several House Republicans who have signed a discharge petition to bring the Secure America with Verification and Enforcement Act up for a vote. The petition would bypass the usual process of getting bills through congressional committees.

The bill, which many liberal Democrats oppose but moderates in the party support, would add 8,000 border patrol agents and increase deportations. It also would revamp a federally run electronic legal-verification program that employers use. U.S. Rep. Heath Shuler, D-N.C., introduced the bill.

“I absolutely admire Heath Shuler’s courage,” Rep. Wamp said. “He’s got a good bill, a bipartisan bill, and it tests the mettle of (centrist Democrats). To move forward, they have to stand against the more liberal members of their party.”

Democrats accuse Republicans of playing political games with a serious issue.

U.S. Rep. Lincoln Davis, D-Tenn., said he will not sign the petition, despite co-sponsoring the bill.

“The same Republicans who failed for years to secure our borders when they controlled the Congress are playing politics again with immigration,” he said. “Should the SAVE Act come to the floor for a real up or down vote, I will gladly vote for the bill.”

The petition must have 218 lawmaker signatures for the bill to be “discharged” for a vote by the full House, meaning Republicans will need signatures from some Democrats to succeed.

U.S. Reps. John Duncan, R-Tenn., and Nathan Deal and Phil Gingrey, both R-Ga., have signed on, and Republican leaders are courting more lawmakers. As of Wednesday evening, the petition had 163 signatures.

Rep. Shuler has signed the petition, though he said he would have preferred the legislation to come up through the normal process. Rep. Wamp defended the use of the petition.

“When you’re in the minority and the majority won’t bring (the bill) up, you only have one route, and that’s the discharge,” he said.

The last discharge petition to succeed was a campaign finance reform bill in 2002, brought up by the then-Democratic minority and passed over the objections of then-House Speaker Tom Delay, R-Texas.

Proponents of the bill favor the enforcement-first approach, saying the border needs to be secured before other immigration issues are addressed. measure

Opponents say the bill provides no safeguards against erroneous information in the verification database and will hurt the economy by stepping up the deportation of millions of workers.



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegalentrants; immigration; lincolndavis; shuler
Rep. Lincoln Davis, D-Tenn., said he will not sign the petition, despite co-sponsoring the bill.

“The same Republicans who failed for years to secure our borders when they controlled the Congress are playing politics again with immigration,” he said. “Should the SAVE Act come to the floor for a real up or down vote, I will gladly vote for the bill.”

Oh come on. You co sponsored the bill certain that it would die in committee. Now it may actually go to the floor for real debate and that loud beeping sound is you backing the truck up. Pelosi has your panties on a hook doesn't she? I hope the voters in your  district that you were trying to appeal to when you co sponsored the bill are paying attention and will vote your butt out. What blatant hypocrisy.

 

1 posted on 03/13/2008 7:00:39 AM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah; Horusra; Normandy; CygnusXI; Fiddlstix; Defendingliberty; WL-law; steelyourfaith

ping


2 posted on 03/13/2008 7:02:48 AM PDT by Delacon (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Sure... He’s playing both sides of the issue. The Dems always do this.


3 posted on 03/13/2008 7:02:59 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

With a name like Lincoln Davis, he’s used to playing both sides of an issue!


4 posted on 03/13/2008 7:05:05 AM PDT by Judges Gone Wild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; bcsco

Ping!


5 posted on 03/13/2008 7:05:41 AM PDT by Guenevere (If you do not stand firm in your faith, you will not stand at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judges Gone Wild

“With a name like Lincoln Davis, he’s used to playing both sides of an issue!”

LOL, I never thought of that. Can we hope his middle name is Booth?


6 posted on 03/13/2008 7:06:50 AM PDT by Delacon (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
The same Republicans who failed for years to secure our borders when they controlled the Congress are playing politics again with immigration,” he said. “Should the SAVE Act come to the floor for a real up or down vote, I will gladly vote for the bill.”

Well he isn't lying here. The Republicans are like little girls yelling from behind the fence.

7 posted on 03/13/2008 7:16:18 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetson

“Well he isn’t lying here. The Republicans are like little girls yelling from behind the fence.”

Can’t argue with that.


8 posted on 03/13/2008 7:23:58 AM PDT by Delacon (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
The last discharge petition to succeed was a campaign finance reform bill in 2002, brought up by the then-Democratic minority and passed over the objections of then-House Speaker Tom Delay, R-Texas.

Um gotta love the Dino-MSM. The Hammer was NEVER House Speaker, as much as I and I am sure several of us here at FR would have wished him to be.

I do hope this passes.

9 posted on 03/13/2008 8:10:02 AM PDT by Weaponier (Someone turn off the lights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetson
Well he isn't lying here.

What he isn't mentioning is that the Dems now have control and haven't fixed the problem either. In fact, they've been fighting against any efforts to do so.

10 posted on 03/13/2008 8:18:02 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

Thanks for the PING

Zach is my congressman...


11 posted on 03/13/2008 8:24:16 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; Carry_Okie; DoughtyOne; SierraWasp

Attention Californians!

CA Alert! State legislation would penalize business owners for knowingly hiring illegal aliens
Due to the unwillingness of the federal government to enforce immigration laws at the workplace, Assemblyman Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar) has introduced legislation to revoke the business licenses of employers who deliberately hire illegal aliens in California.

Under AB 2421, a business that the court finds to have intentionally employed an unauthorized alien would temporarily or permanently lose its business license.

Please click here to learn more and to take action.
http://capwiz.com/caps/issues/alert/?alertid=11121271&type=ST


12 posted on 03/13/2008 8:49:59 AM PDT by AuntB ('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Cool.
13 posted on 03/13/2008 9:02:27 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

Totally agree. I’d like to add that the SAVE Act would fly through congress if it had H-2A increase provisions. The few dems who introduced this bill did so without them because it would have taken wind out of the sails for their soon to be introduced amnesty bills.


14 posted on 03/13/2008 9:04:40 AM PDT by Delacon (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Anyone know if the SAVE Act, in it’s current form, still gives pardon to churches that harbor illegal aliens (think Elvira)?


15 posted on 03/13/2008 1:08:46 PM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

You are blessed.


16 posted on 03/14/2008 8:12:54 AM PDT by Guenevere (If you do not stand firm in your faith, you will not stand at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

:)


17 posted on 03/14/2008 8:22:01 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Thank you AuntB.


18 posted on 03/17/2008 1:30:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson