Posted on 03/13/2008 4:09:15 AM PDT by Man50D
WASHINGTON -- A largely unreported meeting held at the State Department discussed integration of the U.S., Mexico and Canada in concert with a move toward a transatlantic union, linking a North American community with the European Union.
The meeting was held Monday under the auspices of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy, or ACIEP. WND obtained press credentials and attended as an observer. The meeting was held under "Chatham House" rules that prohibit reporters from attributing specific comments to individual participants.
The State Department website noted the meeting was opened by Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs Daniel S. Sullivan and ACIEP Chairman Michael Gadbaw, vice president and senior counsel for General Electric's International Law & Policy group since December 1990.
WND observed about 25 ACIEP members, including U.S. corporations involved in international trade, prominent U.S. business trade groups, law firms involved with international business law, international investment firms and other international trade consultants.
No members of Congress attended the meeting.
The agenda for the ACIEP meeting was not published, and State Department officials in attendance could not give WND permission under Chatham House rules to publish the agenda.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
I did notice that a Mod is here.
Your blandishments befit your usual BS. About ten seconds of search time I came up with this description:
You might begin to annoy me if you persist. It is not “usual BS” to point out that Corsi is a carnival-barker. The only question is how far someone like you follows him.
Yep, ever vigilant. ;)
Man50D: That's interesting considering the thread fits FR's own definition of New/Activism is "News and discussion of current events." This is certainly a current news event and is not a non sourced thread. Could it be FR wants to cover up the fact George Bush is trying to destroy our national sovereignty?
Oh no, JimRob's part of the international one-world government conspiracy!
And you folks wonder why there are so many skeptics...
Heh! OK, fair enough.
Calpernia: The thread has been moved to blogger.
Man50D: That's interesting considering the thread fits FR's own definition of New/Activism is "News and discussion of current events." This is certainly a current news event and is not a non sourced thread. Could it be FR wants to cover up the fact George Bush is trying to destroy our national sovereignty?
Oh no, JimRob's part of the international one-world government conspiracy!
And you folks wonder why there are so many skeptics...
You sound surprised. Like FATHER like SON. Remember his daddy is the man who coined the term New World Order into the modern lexicon after using the term in a speech to the UN over 39 times!
Saaay, you wouldn't have anything to do with these keywords...wouldya? :)
cuespookymusic; icecreammandrake; preciousbodilyfluids; sapandimpurify;
"U.S. corporations?"
What is a U.S. corporation in the minds of these people? That term is becoming "passe."
That lack of observance to nationhood is one of the problems of the heart of this monster, that must be killed.
When I posted 48,
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1984944/posts?page=48#48
it was moved to blogger.
Post 70 by the Admin moderator confirms for you it was moved from a category (which I’m telling you was blogger).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1984944/posts?page=70#70
Since you used the word folkS with your statement along with your ping, you are accusing me of something. State what it is or shut up.
“Remember his daddy is the man who coined the term New World Order into the modern lexicon after using the term in a speech to the UN over 39 times!”
Now we get into true conspiracy territory. Find for me Bush’s speech on the UN site, or a cite that shows he was even there that day. You should check the presidential archives at
http://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/
You’ll find the archivists are in on the conspiracy by making it seem that Bush never gave that speech!
It is rare for a US president to address the UN. Such an event is recorded in multiple places, in MSM, US Government, and at the UN itself. The conspiracy is so deep that all records of his appearance have been expunged, and false records planted to cover up the secret.
I looked into teh Bush New World Order story and traced it back to an anonymously published book that went into great detail about the speech and what ill it bode us all.
As for NAU, I think there is some there there but it’s being privately driven for now.
I followed the first time, thank you.
“...NWO/NAU.”
We’ll have a clue as to the authenticity of the planned direction of our Nation with the ruling on the 2nd Amendment by SCOTUS soon. Until then, I watch with interest.
what will it take for you to wake up
it is not about anything but $$$$$
do you pay attention at all to what is going on in DC
they defy us left and right- Chambers of Commerce - special interests, etc...own the folks we elect- not us.
BINGO!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.