Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
Why is he blaming Republicans? It was Hillary’s campaign that started this.
And if you are going to put it on Republicans, it should be noted that BOTH Ann Coulter and Bill Cunnigham are PASSIONATE Hillary Supporters.
He is a Muslim and if elected he will bring about the demise of America.
It isn’t that his middle name is Hussein, or that he was raised by an anthropologist that married two muslims, or that Barak Hussein Obama prayed in mosques as a young man and went to a Muslim school. It’s not that he is part of a church that has given awards to Louis Farakhan nor is it that he tap dances around rejecting an endorsement by Farakhan. It’s not even that B. Hussein wants to withdraw from Iraq even after violence and attacks have dropped and we are winning. No, it’s not all that. It’s actually about racism, see.
Should read:
"Barack H*ssein Obama is for real."
“Republicans are going to try to brand Obama as an ultra-liberal pacifist, which is also a crock.”
It is a crock, there is nothing liberal about him, he is an ultra-socialist demagogue.
How can that be? Somebody was insisting to me yesterday that the whole nefarious scheme was cooked up by the Hillary! campaign! Oh yeah, her aunt's uncle's ex-wifes sister's ex cousin was married to a Jewish man or something like that.
So, does this mean we have to leave the bin out of Osama bin Laden?
If you mention his church your racist.
If you mention anything he said that makes no sense or sounds crazy (like bombing our allies and talking to our enemies), you’re silly and stupid.
If you show a picture of him in Somali grab, you’re of course racist.
If you mention his wife making statements that sound awfully like she said that she wasn’t proud of the US, you’re racist.
If you make reference of Luis Farrakhan endorsing him, you’re a racist.
Best thing is to simply hand him the keys to the Oval Office. Anything less than that would be a xenophobic and racist act which would make his wife not proud to be an American anymore.
Baraq Husayn ibn Mahomet.
There.
Come and get me.
Why doesn’t Oprahbama just change His middle name to Hugh and tell people His mama told Him that was really what she wanted to name Him but she sneezed when she told the people what His middle name was and they spelled it wrong. She didn’t notice until some time later and never got around to changing it.
The same thing happened to His first name, but she coughed instead of sneezed. His father was actually the son of a Kenyan mother and and Irish father, so His REAL name is Barry Hugh O’Brien. Those poor Kenyans spelled O’Brien wrong, too.
CNN will fly a reporter and a medium to His mama’s grave so they can tune her in and they can hear it from her firsthand, just to make sure.
Get Jon Cary to back them up on the story and all will be cool.
These clowns in the media are a bunch of hypocrites. They never seemed to have a problem emphasizing JOHN WAYNE Bobbitt or JOHN WAYNE Gacy. I always had a problem with that.
Obama did not withdraw from running for president because his middle name is Hussein so why should he be offended if it’s used now? Sorry radical left....you lose again!
In my mind, and call me a bigot all you want, my choice is clear. Do I want someone that will be tough on the IslamoFascists, or someone (possibly due to family loyalties) who will try and appease them?
I do not go into the conspiracy theories that Barak Hussein Obama is a "closet" Muslim, but his family is, and he will go out of his way to avoid "insulting" them. I don't by any means think that there are no "good" loving Muslims out there. There are. And they want peace just like we do. But there is also a large contingent of the religion that will fight to their deaths to make us live by their rules, and I for one will not sit by and let that happen. So if that means pointing out that Baraks father had 4 wives at the same time, or that Barak was registered as a Muslim at a grade school he attended, I will do that, and screw anyone that calls me a bigot. Because I am a bigot in this case, and proud of it!!
And why not? Expressing belief in the idea of a single true religion, a jealous G-d that will have no rival, Divine authorship of the Torah, and opposition to homosexuality is considered "anti-Israel and anti-Semitic" for so many, I think sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. And why is it that support for violations of Universal Noachide Law (by liberal politicians) is never classified as "anti-Semitism?"
Remember, until about the last 40 years, evangelical Christianity and the right wing of the Republican Party were saturated with anti-Semitism.
What an idiot or liar. There has been a Zionist strain in Evangelical Protestantism for some three hundred years. But never mind, popular myth is that people who believe in G-d hate the Jews and that people who support the Jews hate G-d, so just keep on repeating it.
The Democratic party has been the refuge of the Hollywierd Jewish community since before Joe McCarthy, and have been no friend of the Republican party since. I think it is all to easy to label someone as Antisemitic for having an issue with one Jewish person.
The thing that I find most amazing is that from a philosophical view point Judaism is much more compatable with the tenets of the Republican party.
As far as I know, these guys never wanted to kill the Jews, they wanted them to (voluntarily) become Christians. That is a significant difference, IMHO.
Not sure about Pat, though. I have a lot less respect for him than for the other two.
Hey, Obama is the one with the racist name.