Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Sinclair $100,000 Polygraph challenge has been scheduled for next Tuesday in NYC
http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=110 ^

Posted on 02/19/2008 11:46:19 AM PST by HD1200

We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.

We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at a undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert..

Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: damnlies; larrysinclair; lies; obama; obamagay; pornking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: pissant
No, it’s not.

Based on this story, it sounds like it still is.

Based on the site's history, I'd have to view anything coming out of there as deeply suspicious in terms of its news value.
101 posted on 02/19/2008 1:36:24 PM PST by Antoninus (Looks like 2008 could be McCain vs. Hussein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

The fact that a former porn site that is now a political news outlet is paying Larry Sinclair $100k to take a polygraph on his allegations of sex and drugs with Obama just screams Larry Flynt.


102 posted on 02/19/2008 1:36:28 PM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Toskrin
This whole thing smells like nothing but a promotion for www.whitehouse.com.

The guy suddenly appears on their website...

It's possible but it would be more complex and long-term than you think. Larry Sinclair was on YouTube for months before whitehouse.com mentioned him. Mr. Sinclair claims that he contacted the Obama campaign back in September, and numerous major papers etc. in the meantime and that YouTube was a last-ditch attempt to get attention. Whitehouse.com claims they posted their offer to Mr. Sinclair in response to his YouTube video. Maybe they're lying but what evidence is there of this?

So whitehouse.com is after money? So what? So is most every other website, newspaper, television network, etc.

103 posted on 02/19/2008 1:40:01 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

It is not where the story originated. They picked it up after is lingered in cyberspace for a month. They offered to pay for the polygraph. We shall see where it goes. Could it all be a fraud? Sure. But I don’t think so after listening to Mr. Sinclair on two long interviews.

Here is one.

http://trp.fileburst.com/TRP_2008.02.08_Larry-Sinclair-Interview.mp3


104 posted on 02/19/2008 1:40:54 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

ROTFLMAO!!!


105 posted on 02/19/2008 1:41:13 PM PST by Quickgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I have watched the videos, and I, like you, trend toward believing him. They must come up with the limo driver, though...


106 posted on 02/19/2008 1:42:08 PM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke
Polygraph testing is sheer pseudoscience, and while it may make for titillating low-brow political theater, it is a poor substitute for actual evidence.

If everyone best in a position to know thought that polygraph was worthless then it would not exist to the extent it does. Governments, corporations, and lots of individuals use polygraph as a tool.

107 posted on 02/19/2008 1:42:20 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Yep. A polygraph is only marginal. He claims he can produce the limo driver, but will only do so after the MSM pays attention.


108 posted on 02/19/2008 1:43:26 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke
To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Sinclair has presented no documentation whatsoever of his claims regarding Mr. Obama.

Mr. Sinclair claims otherwise. Perhaps the best of your knowledge is not the appropriate standard here.

109 posted on 02/19/2008 1:44:12 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
In addition to their sex urges being screwed up I think their emotional stability is affected a lot of the time

Short and straight to the point- thanks. Your reply give me a chance to identify (thanks Wiki) Governor McGreevy of New Jersey. Luckily for me it was confirmed that the Governor went public, because of Cipel..... and his lawyer. Said to have pressured the Governor for monies. (wouldn't you know it).

I have deliberately not commented on Barack Obama because I do not have the vote, still, I would like to see conservatism stand up and box clean ( old country expression). Standing tall and keeping to the issues. (enough said).

110 posted on 02/19/2008 1:44:47 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
This story is just ridiculous. If Obama is a gay crack whore, I'm the Easter Bunny.

Nobody has said anything about prostitution. There is no prostitution angle to this story.

111 posted on 02/19/2008 1:47:07 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Might be, but remember, whitehouse.com didn’t start this. It appears they heard about it a month after he made his charges that last fall he wanted the Obama campaign to come clean on it. Their first reports on it were very sceptical. That being said.....who knows? Maybe it is all a big deal about nothign to get whitehouse.com hits up.


112 posted on 02/19/2008 1:47:37 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke
Thus far, he has offered no evidence whatsoever to back up his claims.

Says who?

113 posted on 02/19/2008 1:48:00 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Beta blockers should do pretty well for that.


114 posted on 02/19/2008 1:49:15 PM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
One can only pray that this is the final nail in the bitch’s coffin, that democrats all across America will not believe it when these POS deny they are involved. Surely the undecided will smell the Clinton stench all over this and vote for Obama.

Of course, if by some miracle someone can tie the Clintons to this farce, then they are finally done.

Never ceases to amaze me, all the questionable primary wins where there was evidence of illegalities, it was Clinton win. All the scandals, both political and personal in the careers of these grifters... And it’s Obama whose name is being dragged through the mud ...

115 posted on 02/19/2008 1:50:00 PM PST by Beatthedrum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder
Hey, the Clintoons are doing some of the grunt work for us to use in the fall.

I seem to remember Algore breaking the Willie Horton story against Mike Dukakis...

116 posted on 02/19/2008 1:51:00 PM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Polygraphs are used all the time. They are not used in many courts because they do not meet the strict legal evidentiary standards for reliabile scientific testing. But, they are used by the police, govt. agencies and private enterprise all the time.


117 posted on 02/19/2008 1:51:22 PM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Peter Libra
Why does the homosexual seek to destroy? It beats me.

Homosexuality seeks to destroy. Always and everywhere.

I think it is anger at being in an evolutionary cul-de-sac holding a wasting asset (sexual attractiveness). There is simply no tomorrow, so why not be like Samson and tear the whole edifice down?

118 posted on 02/19/2008 1:54:17 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

“All of the remaining primaries are critical. When might this polygraph occur that you would not question the timing?”

It is not true that all the remaining primaries are critical. Hawaii is not critical, neither is RI, VT, WV,etc. It is generally accepted that Hellary has to win the 3 big states remaining (TX, OH and PA) to stay competitive. Unless she wins big in those states the others don’t really matter to her. I wouldnt question the timing if this was revealed after March 4th. BTW, did you find the timing of the story about W’s drunk driving conviction, which was reported a day or so before the 2000 election, suspicious? Or was it coincidence?


119 posted on 02/19/2008 1:54:46 PM PST by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Well, it will launch Whitehouse.com that’s for sure. The reason I still think Larry Flynt is involved (not that I don’t think Sinclair sounds credible)is because he threatened sex scandals in this campaign.


120 posted on 02/19/2008 1:55:04 PM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson