Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just a little rabble rousing on my part.

I'll post daily values from the above link.

Today's values are:
Flux Density Values in sfu for 22:00 on 2008:02:12

Julian Day Number : 2454509.406

Carrington Rotation Number : 2066.683

Observed Flux Density : 0072.2

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0070.4


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0063.4
As you can see, it still isn't going up.

If anyone else has other juicy links or comments to demonstrate how super serial our situation is, or even just pictures of Manbearpig, please chime in. –.^

BTW ... all fun aside, global cooling is BAD.
1 posted on 02/13/2008 7:53:37 AM PST by Rurudyne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Rurudyne
To get the flux up again, they just need to buy a Mr. Fusion.
2 posted on 02/13/2008 8:05:32 AM PST by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; Beowulf

Beam me to Planet Gore !

The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet

WeatherQuestions
Roy Spencer, the Official Climatologist of the EIB Network

3 posted on 02/13/2008 8:06:19 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne
We're all gonna die!!!!

4 posted on 02/13/2008 8:06:59 AM PST by Lazamataz (Why isn’t this in Breaking News????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne; xcamel

clickable link/solar activity info.

http://www.drao-ofr.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/icarus/www/current_flux.shtml


5 posted on 02/13/2008 8:07:36 AM PST by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

Rurudyne?

Any relation to the Yoyodyne industries?

Do you know Dr John Bigbootie?


6 posted on 02/13/2008 8:09:18 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - Back On The Net!!(Mash Here!)



7 posted on 02/13/2008 8:11:41 AM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

I’d like to point out the obvious... we’re at the bottom of the current solar cycle, which means yes, indeed solar flux is low, geomagnetic field will be relatively quiet. Technically, we are probably starting on the upslope of the next cycle (24) so we will see an increase in solar activity over the next 5 or so years as sun spots increase, the sun becomes more active, and magnetic fields start to shift again.

http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/
http://www.dxlc.com/solar/

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080104_sunspot.html


8 posted on 02/13/2008 8:12:32 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity 12 Feb 2008
SDF Number 043 Issued at 2200Z on 12 Feb 2008

IA. Analysis of Solar Active Regions and Activity from 11/2100Z to 12/2100Z: Solar activity was at very low levels. The visible solar disk remained spotless.

IB. Solar Activity Forecast: Solar activity is expected to remain at very low levels


10 posted on 02/13/2008 8:44:20 AM PST by milwguy (........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

bflr


11 posted on 02/13/2008 8:47:23 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne
BTW ... all fun aside, global cooling is BAD.

Under normal circumstances that would be a very uncontroversial observation. However, given the current hysteria over global warming, we might discover that the political benefits of global cooling outweigh the economic costs.

In other words, a continuing belief in catastrophic anthropogenic global warming will have enormous worldwide long-term economic costs as CO2 emissions are regulated, and equally enormous political costs as our various freedoms (including freedom of speech in opposition to global warming orthodoxy) are suppressed.

Whereas a significant and irrefutable reduction in current global temperatures, along with credible predictions of future temperature declines as the sun's output diminishes and we enter a Maunder Minimum, will discredit the global warming alarmists. It will take awhile, and they won't go down easily, but it will become harder and harder for them to maintain that anthropogenic global warming is going to destroy the earth when the earth keeps getting cooler.

If this derails the agenda of Gore acolytes, it may well compensate for the economic disadvantages of cooling. After all, we have the technology to keep ourselves warm. I like living in sunny southern California, but I was born and raised in Wisconsin and I can survive in a colder climate. Improved nuclear power and other advanced energy sources will be developed long before the slow pace of cooling can have a drastic impact on our lives.

26 posted on 02/13/2008 1:36:33 PM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

What’s the TAX we need to pay to stop this???


27 posted on 02/13/2008 1:42:47 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEMOCRAT-You'll look great in a Burka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

This story is a significant exageration.

Solar flux is low, of course, like it always is at the bottom of the solar cycle but the current figures are not that unusual.

This cycle is a long one. There is definitely some correlation with declining global temperatures and longer solar cycles so that makes it important. But it isn’t significantly longer than the average yet.

Before articles like this appear, the lack of a new cycle starting would have to be played out for another 6 months or more.

If that does happen, however, then we should start worrying because there will likely be crop failures and colder temperatures like the last drops in solar activity in the early 1800s and Maunder Minimum in the 17th century.

But solar cycle 24 will probably start in a few more months.


29 posted on 02/13/2008 7:23:35 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne
I understood there was ONE reverse polarity sunspot in early December 2007, then ONE more since then somewhere near the middle of January. So it’s like the cycle 24 is trying to start, but has absolutely no momentum or energy yet.

If so, wasn’t the original predictions for cycle 24 supposed to have it starting (going through this minimum period) around the middle of April LAST year?

30 posted on 02/13/2008 7:41:58 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne
Check out this one....

What shall we call the next minimum?
31 posted on 02/13/2008 7:49:08 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

Discovery Channel has a big special coming up, I think this weekend, called 6 Degrees changing the world. Or something like that. IT IS pure propaganda. From what I see on their advertisements, 2 degrees melts the ice caps, 4 degrees turns the Amazon into sand dunes, and 6 degrees puts NY City under 200 feet of water.


40 posted on 02/14/2008 5:56:13 AM PST by RetiredArmy (VOTED: Disgruntled Voter of the Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

February 14th update

Flux Density Values in sfu for 18:00 on 2008:02:14

Julian Day Number : 2454511.239

Carrington Rotation Number : 2066.751

Observed Flux Density : 0070.1

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0068.3

URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0061.5


41 posted on 02/14/2008 10:56:24 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

A related thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952624/posts


47 posted on 02/15/2008 3:26:30 AM PST by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; AnAmericanMother; arthurus; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; BraveMan; Carry_Okie; chpmass; cob201; ...
The Sun on Vacation: Day 42 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum

Dated from January 4th, 2008, with confirmaion of sunspot #10,981.

Friday “Ping”

If there are official ping list, then this sure isn’t one of them. –.^

If anyone want’s on or off my list that I’ve compiled just send me a note.

Also: do you like the title?
“Day 42 of the Earth Held Hostage” didn’t seem to work with the sun being on “Vacation.” I’m having fun here and I don’t really believe it’s the dawn of a new Ice Age.
Or so I would hope.

Please post any of your cool links.

Today’s values from The Solar Radio Monitoring Programme:
Flux Density Values in sfu for 18:00 on 2008:02:15

Julian Day Number : 2454512.239

Carrington Rotation Number : 2066.787

Observed Flux Density : 0069.9

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0068.2


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0061.4

(in bold text, 64-68 is considered rock bottom)

51 posted on 02/15/2008 12:19:56 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

Just great. I want my global warming!


53 posted on 02/15/2008 12:57:48 PM PST by Tribune7 (How is inflicting pain and death on an innocent, helpless human being for profit, moral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne
“Flux Density Values so low they will mean a mini ice age if they continue”

I feel like I’m back in 6th grade in the 1970’s. That’s what we were being told then. And they were also serious at that time..

59 posted on 02/15/2008 8:31:50 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson