Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who would be worse for National Security and Foreign Policy: Hillary or Obama?
2-9-08 | VANITY

Posted on 02/09/2008 1:45:37 PM PST by Anti-Hillary

I have my opinion. What is yours?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: democrat; democrats; dncvalues; hillary; liberalagenda; liberals; liberalvalues; obama; yayanothervanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
This ferver for Obama scares me to death. Given the fact the I think McCain is toast in the general, I now find myself in the odd position of hoping that Hillary is the Dem, nominee.

Obama's links with Islam and his connection to a very strong anti-Israel group of advisors is VERY troublesome.

1 posted on 02/09/2008 1:45:45 PM PST by Anti-Hillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Add McCain and Hucklebee and I would have to say all of the above!


2 posted on 02/09/2008 1:46:44 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Trick question. They both suck.
3 posted on 02/09/2008 1:47:57 PM PST by RichInOC (Democrats p**s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Would you rather be shot or strangled?


4 posted on 02/09/2008 1:48:44 PM PST by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

“Add McCain and Hucklebee and I would have to say all of the above!”

If we don’t get logical, it will be Hillary. I hate to say this, but I’ll vote for McCain


5 posted on 02/09/2008 1:48:53 PM PST by lookout88 (Combat search and rescue officer's dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fatez

Yes, or rather like: Would you rather die from being drawn and quartered or from napalm?


6 posted on 02/09/2008 1:49:49 PM PST by jwalburg (Gullible warming protesters are self-extinguishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Why not? She and Bill already armed the next Superpower with the technology they needed to destroy us.

That, and telling a fragile, nuclear Pakistan how to run their country.

Other than those kind of things.....


7 posted on 02/09/2008 1:50:21 PM PST by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Agree, Obama is worse, but only marginally. They both take this country down the crapper. The question is how fast? Can we recover before our enemies notice we are defenseless?

McCain would be slower but more permanent.

Just my $.02

8 posted on 02/09/2008 1:51:00 PM PST by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lookout88
If we don’t get logical, it will be Hillary. I hate to say this, but I’ll vote for McCain

Is there a difference?

9 posted on 02/09/2008 1:51:41 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Admin Moderator for President. No amnesty for the establishment—Republican and Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Hillary is on record as loathing the military.

Obama lacke the gravitas to be taken seriously


10 posted on 02/09/2008 1:51:56 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . "You can't be that way"......... Clint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Why is it Hillary and Obama?

Should be Clinton and Obama...

11 posted on 02/09/2008 1:52:39 PM PST by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Obama will be far worse than Hillary. In the first place, he’s a Black Muslim. In the second place, he hates this country because of white people spitting on him (or so he says). And in the third place, once he takes over and turns the entire country over to the very same people who have destroyed every American city they’ve taken over (not to mention every foreign country), we’ll fall into the Islamic world’s hands like rotted fruit.


12 posted on 02/09/2008 1:52:50 PM PST by lapster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Obama wants to make kissy-face with El Hugo Loco, Holocaust denier Imadingybat, and various and sundry other of the world’s Jew-hating tyrants and thugs. Hillary might be a little more reserved in that respect, though I do remember her french-kissing Mdm Arafat. One will likely be as disasterous as the other.


13 posted on 02/09/2008 1:53:40 PM PST by attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Yeah, there is.


14 posted on 02/09/2008 1:54:21 PM PST by lookout88 (Combat search and rescue officer's dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

I am a very strong supporter of Israel always have been.
I do not support Olmert the appeasing lawyer.

Some things Israel has done in the past disturb me such as the attack on our spy ship off their coast years ago.

But Israel is a democracy and an ally of the U.S. or should I say America is an ally of Israel. While the rest of the mid-east is a bunch of crazy strong arm type govt.

We give Israel billions every year. As we do Egypt and I just don’t see that we get our moneys worth.


15 posted on 02/09/2008 1:54:28 PM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

This sounds like the old joke about the 3 sailors washed up on an island where they are captured by the local natives who give them the choice of being boiled alive or experiencing ruga-ruga. Either choice results in ruga-ruga and then death.


16 posted on 02/09/2008 1:54:31 PM PST by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Obama. Hillary would nuke any counry that insults her.


17 posted on 02/09/2008 1:56:02 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lookout88
That's the way I see it, too. I simply don't have time for yet another "strategic loss," like those we took in 1992 and 2006, which everyone claimed would be "good for the party".

The reality is the RNC has never seemed comfortable with conservatives and would prefer moderates. This is a source of constant perplexity on my behalf, but...you play the hand you're dealt.

18 posted on 02/09/2008 1:56:09 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Six SCOTUS justices will be 70 or older in January of next year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

My question is what will either do once they are president? ie how will they go about destroying our country in four yrs? Will our citizens put up with too much intervention, diplomacy, taxes? What will citizens do when we have terror attacks on our land?


19 posted on 02/09/2008 1:57:46 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

The lesser of two evils—an inexperienced, unrepentant islamic puppy or an amoral, ethically-challenged candidate. Both are really bad.


20 posted on 02/09/2008 1:58:28 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson