1 posted on
02/03/2008 12:12:36 PM PST by
traumer
To: traumer
So how many phone books did it go through?
To: traumer
3 posted on
02/03/2008 12:20:44 PM PST by
Crazieman
(The Democrat Party: Culture of Treason)
To: traumer
Wow, now that’s a vapor trail. Amazing...
4 posted on
02/03/2008 12:20:53 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(McCain: RNC will adore him. Get ready for McCain day in photos & Prayer threads. Oh the humanities!)
To: traumer
I want the hand-held version for home protection.
To: traumer
6 posted on
02/03/2008 12:24:14 PM PST by
traumer
To: traumer
7 posted on
02/03/2008 12:27:47 PM PST by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: traumer
20 years ago the EMSL program was alive and well, started by a small splinter group of aerospace people. It was a ground based version of the space based KKV, an orbiting electric cannon. The objective was to shoot projectiles directly into LEO. As you may know, one pound in LEO, moving at 5 mps and 100 miles up, is worth all of 4 KWH of electrical energy vs $20,000/# on the shuttle.
The rail gun was one system that was considered but after 3-4 shots the rails have to be refurbished, thus making it an impractical EMSL(ElectroMagnetic Space Launch)concept. A far better concept was the quenched superconducting rings idea. Here you have the sabot/projectile at the base with a series of su-co rings pulling upward on it. Release and then precisely quench(turn off)each ring as it passes(with heating lasars). Accelerations in the 150,000g to 300,000g range, the basic “freight car” to space vs the shuttle’s delicate 3g “passenger car”.
In about 300 ft of length you get the required 5 mps injection velocity of the 10 kg projectile. Movie film chambers at the top to maintain internal vacuum, lithium pore nose in the projectile...this was all worked out 20 years ago but vested interests NASA killed it(competition from a better idea). EMSL could put 2 shuttle loads/day in LEO at a tiny fraction of what NASA charges YOU as an STS.
10 posted on
02/03/2008 12:48:50 PM PST by
timer
(n/0=n=nx0)
To: traumer
quick... someone tell me.. What was the name of that Arnold Schwarzenegger movie whose “bad guys” use this technology? Argh... can’t remember, must check internet......
13 posted on
02/03/2008 1:05:52 PM PST by
China Clipper
(My favorite animal is whatever is on my plate at that time)
To: traumer
Technical “niggles”. And I thought I’d heard it all over 3 decades of engineering.
To: traumer
The name ‘hypercannon’ is niftier than ‘electro-cannon.’
15 posted on
02/03/2008 1:13:43 PM PST by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: traumer
...technical niggles...Niggles....I like their use of that term. :)
16 posted on
02/03/2008 1:16:00 PM PST by
Keith in Iowa
( <<<Say NO! to Juan McAmnesty!>>>!!! <<<Life's a bitch, don't elect one President.>>>)
To: traumer
enabling them to fire heavier projectiles at targets two hundred miles awayPretty challenging to keep track of the back drop on those kind of shots
17 posted on
02/03/2008 1:25:19 PM PST by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: traumer; The Drowning Witch
Holy ...............
.............MOLY !!!!
24 posted on
02/03/2008 2:49:29 PM PST by
Jackknife
( "The Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco, and Firearms should be a department store, not a gov't agency.")
To: traumer
080131-N-0000X-001 DAHLGREN, Va. (Jan. 31, 2008) Photograph taken from a high-speed video camera during a record-setting firing of an electromagnetic railgun (EMRG) at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, Va., on January 31, 2008, firing at 10.64MJ (megajoules) with a muzzle velocity of 2520 meters per second. The Office of Naval Research's EMRG program is part of the Department of the Navy's Science and Technology investments, focused on developing new technologies to support Navy and Marine Corps war fighting needs. This photograph is a frame taken from a high-speed video camera. U.S. Navy Photograph (Released)
U.S. Navy Demonstrates World's Most Powerful EMRG at 10 Megajoules
To: traumer
Now all the admirals have to do is figure out how to get the damn thing in range of a target before the ship gets creamed by a airborne or static missile.
These guys are still fighting the last big war (WWII) in their bathtubs. Give us a break.
31 posted on
02/03/2008 7:54:34 PM PST by
wildbill
To: traumer; All
33 posted on
02/03/2008 9:05:10 PM PST by
Wiz
To: traumer
"...muzzle energy of 10.6 megajoules"
damn!!!
Where can I get one?
38 posted on
02/05/2008 1:05:02 PM PST by
JWinNC
(www.anailinhisplace.net)
To: traumer
7,818,159 foot-pounds. That’ll leave a mark.
41 posted on
02/05/2008 2:24:36 PM PST by
Redcloak
("A plague o' both your houses!")
To: traumer
To be banned by a Federal Judge within the week and sold by our next president to Iran so they will give up their nuclear program./Sarc?
44 posted on
02/05/2008 2:36:23 PM PST by
Steamburg
(Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson