Posted on 01/31/2008 12:59:13 PM PST by Froufrou
The US Navy will astound the world tomorrow by test-firing a radical new weapon system at an unprecedented power level. The new piece of war-tech on trial is that old sci-fi favourite, an electromagnetic railgun.
According to the Office of Naval Research, which is in charge of the project, the electric cannon will deliver over ten megajoules of energy in one shot. The ONR say this is "a power level never before achieved" by a railgun, and already represents significantly more poke than a normal five-inch naval gun can put behind its shells.
The designers hope in future to get the technology up to 64 megajoule muzzle-energy levels, able to shoot hypervelocity projectiles at a blistering Mach 7 and strike targets two hundred miles away - still going at Mach 5 - with pinpoint precision.
The US navy is interested in the kit for a number of reasons. For one, its next generation warships are expected to use electric drive systems, meaning that they will be have 80 megawatts or more on hand. If this power can be used to put violence onto the enemy as well as driving the ship, that's good news for logistics and supply.
The only ammo you need is solid shot with guidance fins; there's no need for tons of high-explosive warheads and low-explosive chemical propellants for regular shells and missiles. These are replaced by nice simple fuel for the ship's engines.
The lack of exploding warheads could offer a chance to deliver more surgical strikes, too. They could take out a single vehicle from far out at sea, perhaps, rather than pulverising a whole area like present-day cruise missiles. This kind of thing is very trendy nowadays in military circles, though the problem of getting the right vehicle remains a tricky one.
Furthermore, even the ritziest missiles struggle to get above Mach 3-4, especially over any distance; thus the railgun slugs would be quicker to arrive when bombarding shore targets. They might also be good for shooting down fast-moving flying things.
Indeed, if the cannon could aim quickly enough and the hyper-bullets could steer well enough in flight, lighter-calibre weapons might tip the balance of naval warfare back in favour of surface craft. Ever since the Battle of Midway, sailors have reluctantly been forced to accept that aircraft win sea battles, not ships. But railguns might demote aircraft carriers from their current big-dog naval status and bring in electric dreadnoughts as the capital ships of tomorrow, able to sweep the skies of pesky aircraft or missiles as soon as they dared show themselves above the horizon.
It's easy to see why navies like the idea of electric hypercannons, then. But there are a lot of problems to be overcome. For one, the gun barrel tends to come apart after just a few shots. For another, packing a steady hundred-megawatt supply down into ultra-brief 64 megajoule pulses isn't simple.
64 MEGAJOULES?!?!?!?!?!...........
Yes, when their unmanned there will be less potential for error, wont there?
while there will be details to work out, the unmanned craft will be piloted by real people, with chain of command available instantly for high value target approval. Nothing is perfect, but there are massive advantages gained in performance and lethality.
The barrel would be open anyway, not having to contain high pressure gas.
I'll take the next one after Greg F please...
They’ll be recruiting at video game conventions . . . “Enders Game” here we come.
It’s times like this when I wish I knew more about weapons and how different guns fire. Not to mention I wish I’d been better at physics!
But what I want to know is how much does this weapon cost each firing as far as carbon credits?
Am I to understand that these shots will completely knock out any electrical components of the target or is this just another way to fire a hunk of molten metal?
My wife has convinced my daughter that “pull my finger” is a gross boy’s game. Ridicule has worked where civility failed.
Yes, but it would probably take extraordinary conditioning to stop them from messaging each other things like "UR A FAG, N00b" and "LOL, OMG U PWNED th4t d00d".
Before you can shot it, you have to be able to see it. There's going to be a continuous war between stealth and sensor technology
lol
LOL...
If true this gun could shoot down any orbiting satellite. It will likely require a nuclear power source but it could bury all its nuclear waste by shooting it into the Sun.
Just think, a tiny marshmallow accelerated to the speed they are talking about would put a hole in you, or at least a very big dent.............
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.