Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy to Test Fire Electric Hypercannon
register.com ^ | 01/30/08 | Unknown

Posted on 01/31/2008 12:59:13 PM PST by Froufrou

The US Navy will astound the world tomorrow by test-firing a radical new weapon system at an unprecedented power level. The new piece of war-tech on trial is that old sci-fi favourite, an electromagnetic railgun.

According to the Office of Naval Research, which is in charge of the project, the electric cannon will deliver over ten megajoules of energy in one shot. The ONR say this is "a power level never before achieved" by a railgun, and already represents significantly more poke than a normal five-inch naval gun can put behind its shells.

The designers hope in future to get the technology up to 64 megajoule muzzle-energy levels, able to shoot hypervelocity projectiles at a blistering Mach 7 and strike targets two hundred miles away - still going at Mach 5 - with pinpoint precision.

The US navy is interested in the kit for a number of reasons. For one, its next generation warships are expected to use electric drive systems, meaning that they will be have 80 megawatts or more on hand. If this power can be used to put violence onto the enemy as well as driving the ship, that's good news for logistics and supply.

The only ammo you need is solid shot with guidance fins; there's no need for tons of high-explosive warheads and low-explosive chemical propellants for regular shells and missiles. These are replaced by nice simple fuel for the ship's engines.

The lack of exploding warheads could offer a chance to deliver more surgical strikes, too. They could take out a single vehicle from far out at sea, perhaps, rather than pulverising a whole area like present-day cruise missiles. This kind of thing is very trendy nowadays in military circles, though the problem of getting the right vehicle remains a tricky one.

Furthermore, even the ritziest missiles struggle to get above Mach 3-4, especially over any distance; thus the railgun slugs would be quicker to arrive when bombarding shore targets. They might also be good for shooting down fast-moving flying things.

Indeed, if the cannon could aim quickly enough and the hyper-bullets could steer well enough in flight, lighter-calibre weapons might tip the balance of naval warfare back in favour of surface craft. Ever since the Battle of Midway, sailors have reluctantly been forced to accept that aircraft win sea battles, not ships. But railguns might demote aircraft carriers from their current big-dog naval status and bring in electric dreadnoughts as the capital ships of tomorrow, able to sweep the skies of pesky aircraft or missiles as soon as they dared show themselves above the horizon.

It's easy to see why navies like the idea of electric hypercannons, then. But there are a lot of problems to be overcome. For one, the gun barrel tends to come apart after just a few shots. For another, packing a steady hundred-megawatt supply down into ultra-brief 64 megajoule pulses isn't simple.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battleships; electricdrive; electricdrives; hypercannon; hypercannons; military; miltech; railgun; railguns; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: Froufrou

64 MEGAJOULES?!?!?!?!?!...........

41 posted on 01/31/2008 1:17:17 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
“good for shooting down fast-moving flying things.”
Like satellites?
42 posted on 01/31/2008 1:18:19 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Yes, when their unmanned there will be less potential for error, won’t there?

while there will be details to work out, the unmanned craft will be piloted by real people, with chain of command available instantly for high value target approval. Nothing is perfect, but there are massive advantages gained in performance and lethality.

43 posted on 01/31/2008 1:18:33 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob

The barrel would be open anyway, not having to contain high pressure gas.


44 posted on 01/31/2008 1:18:40 PM PST by RightWhale (oil--the world currency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
All this so future captains will really be able to say “divert engine power to weapons systems”?
45 posted on 01/31/2008 1:18:42 PM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
Wow. Just wow. I want one.

I'll take the next one after Greg F please...

46 posted on 01/31/2008 1:20:20 PM PST by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

They’ll be recruiting at video game conventions . . . “Enders Game” here we come.


47 posted on 01/31/2008 1:20:33 PM PST by Greg F (Romney appointed homosexual activists as judges in Massachusetts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: MrB; crghill; SampleMan; Hexenhammer; Red Badger; Dominick; RightWhale

It’s times like this when I wish I knew more about weapons and how different guns fire. Not to mention I wish I’d been better at physics!


49 posted on 01/31/2008 1:21:55 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

But what I want to know is how much does this weapon cost each firing as far as carbon credits?


50 posted on 01/31/2008 1:21:59 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
dr evil

"No word on sharks with laser beams?"

51 posted on 01/31/2008 1:22:06 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Am I to understand that these shots will completely knock out any electrical components of the target or is this just another way to fire a hunk of molten metal?


52 posted on 01/31/2008 1:23:30 PM PST by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

My wife has convinced my daughter that “pull my finger” is a gross boy’s game. Ridicule has worked where civility failed.


53 posted on 01/31/2008 1:23:30 PM PST by Greg F (Romney appointed homosexual activists as judges in Massachusetts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Plus, you have all of the individuals in charge of different aspects of air battle, each able to concentrate instead of getting distracted by other aspects of battle, and fear of getting tagged.

Yes, but it would probably take extraordinary conditioning to stop them from messaging each other things like "UR A FAG, N00b" and "LOL, OMG U PWNED th4t d00d".

54 posted on 01/31/2008 1:24:03 PM PST by Sloth (I feel real bad for deaf people, cause they have no way of knowing when microwave popcorn is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
able to sweep the skies of pesky aircraft or missiles as soon as they dared show themselves above the horizon

Before you can shot it, you have to be able to see it. There's going to be a continuous war between stealth and sensor technology

55 posted on 01/31/2008 1:24:34 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

lol


56 posted on 01/31/2008 1:24:43 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Yes, but it would probably take extraordinary conditioning to stop them from messaging each other things like "UR A FAG, N00b" and "LOL, OMG U PWNED th4t d00d".

LOL...

57 posted on 01/31/2008 1:24:49 PM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: catbertz; NYFriend; Greg F; crghill
Nothing is perfect, but there are massive advantages gained in performance and lethality.

Sometimes I guess faster really is better. The fallout from nuclear warheads makes it so last century, yes?
58 posted on 01/31/2008 1:24:49 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
strike targets two hundred miles away - still going at Mach 5

If true this gun could shoot down any orbiting satellite. It will likely require a nuclear power source but it could bury all its nuclear waste by shooting it into the Sun.

59 posted on 01/31/2008 1:25:13 PM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Just think, a tiny marshmallow accelerated to the speed they are talking about would put a hole in you, or at least a very big dent.............


60 posted on 01/31/2008 1:25:53 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson