He may be pissin in the wind on this one. I don't think the RNC has any problem whatsoever with how things are going, except they probably wish Rudy was still in the mix.
1 posted on
01/31/2008 5:27:29 AM PST by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: pissant
I don't think the RNC has any problem whatsoever with how things are going, except they probably wish Rudy was still in the mix.
To: pissant
its time for the GOP to front-load the whole freaking process into one date.
I've been saying this for a while now. It would remove the influence of obscure states from determining the nominee, not render voters in late primary states virtually irrelevant (like my state of PA), and save a boatload of money and aggravation.
3 posted on
01/31/2008 5:30:57 AM PST by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Bi-partisanship: Democrats and RINOs working together to screw up the country)
To: pissant
The problems is not that moderates hijacked the party.
The problem was that conservatives split their vote between Thompson, Romney, Huckabee and Hunter.
To: pissant
I think this was fixed to allow McCain to win so I’ll take Romney just to stick it to the insiders who wanted to impose that RINO from Arizona on us.
6 posted on
01/31/2008 5:31:45 AM PST by
Nextrush
(MCCAIN IS THE ESTABLISHMENT CANDIDATE AND MUST BE DEFEATED AT ALL COSTS)
To: pissant
Let Texas matter as much as South CarolinaThis Texan didn't get a say in the matter.
7 posted on
01/31/2008 5:33:42 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: pissant
Sorry, I agree with him. My primary is after “super” Tuesday.
Can you say disenfranchised ?
10 posted on
01/31/2008 5:35:45 AM PST by
EBH
( J. Galt for President)
To: pissant
Well, Lord knows that if it all came down to a single day, the winner will be the guy with name recognition. It steepens the road for someone like Duncan Hunter and gives people like Giuliani and McCain an easier time.
The current situation may need improvement, but it does allow quality people -- who may not yet have national exposure -- to build their campaign up in early states (at least theoretically). If it's all one day, then people will vote for the tried-and-true party faithful who have been in Washington for 20 or 30 years.
No thanks.
To: pissant
NH has become an exurb of Boston, with Bostons sensibilities and, ugh, their voting tastes. NH hasnt been reliably conservative since Reagans first term. These voters would rather be loved by the Boston Globe, than respected by the Union Leader.Hah! The Union Leader endorsed McCain. They are no longer "reliably conservative" either.
13 posted on
01/31/2008 5:36:44 AM PST by
rhombus
To: pissant
The only thing the RNC understands is money and power. They have set things up to ensure they keep power-at least for a little while.
They cannot hold on to power indefinitely without money or support or foot soldiers from the base.
However, we do not have to give them money. Next time they call insisting they need your money to keep Hillary out of office, tell them you’re keeping your money to keep RINO’s out of office.
John McCain was annointed by party leaders, but he’s 4 million dollars in debt. Let his RINO buds pay his debt-not us serfs.
17 posted on
01/31/2008 5:38:41 AM PST by
fetal heart beats by 21st day
(Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
To: pissant
I have another thought. We should vote in the Dem primaries. I plan to vote for Obama. Had enough of us crossed over and voted for Kucinich, the nut roots Left would have had their dream candidate, and the Republicans would have had a landslide. Of course, voting Democrat is like putting your hands in a bucket of sh!t. You never feel like your hands are clean afterward.
Oh, well. Another missed opportunity.
21 posted on
01/31/2008 5:39:49 AM PST by
Hardastarboard
(DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
To: pissant
He does have a good point - places such as Florida, where I live, are stuffed with liberal ex-New Yorkers and others (most of whom probalby still vote in both places). There’s also the geezer vote to deal with.
Geezers tend to love big government, are social liberals and are also somewhat nasty and crabby and have no interest in the future. They’re just voting for themselves when they vote for McCain.
23 posted on
01/31/2008 5:42:33 AM PST by
livius
To: pissant
Take back our party. Yeah, okay.
How?
To: pissant
The Republicans are doing what they always do. They decide whose next in line based on seniority and service. That’s how Dole got the nomination, and why we always run some old fart.
25 posted on
01/31/2008 5:43:02 AM PST by
Hacklehead
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
To: pissant
“Folks, we have let the liberals and RINOS set the agenda. Open Borders, Higher Taxes, and surrender to Kyoto-worshipping technocrats”
Amen!!
26 posted on
01/31/2008 5:43:54 AM PST by
kenmcg
To: pissant
The “Buzzword” is get McCain out of there or we are stuck with all these illegals.
This is our party, not John McCains or Mel Martinez’s, or Lindsay Grahams.
28 posted on
01/31/2008 5:47:22 AM PST by
sweetiepiezer
(Card carrying member of the Vast Rght Wing Conspiracy)
To: pissant
29 posted on
01/31/2008 5:47:35 AM PST by
shove_it
(and have a nice day)
To: pissant
The second paragraph rebuts his thesis and provides the real answer: there just aren't that many conservative voters any more. Ronald Reagan's base of WWII veterans is long gone - the average voter today went to school in the Sixties and Seventies, sang "Kumbaya" and engaged in "Trick-or-Treat for UNICEF", makes more money than he is worth in an office job with an extremely uncertain future, and feels very threatened economically and by urban crime, which he believes is caused by the existence of guns and lack of school funding. He'll pay any amount of taxes he believes necessary to reduce those threats.
The conservative message of independence and self-reliance isn't selling to this crowd - which is why Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter were the only ones trying to sell it this year. Ending up with a cast of apparent RINOs was the only logical outcome - unfortunately, the one with the most famous name is beating out the one who would make the most capable administrator.
31 posted on
01/31/2008 5:51:14 AM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: pissant
Sierra-square, Delda-square.
McLame wants to 'change Washington', but he has been part of that cabal for years.
McLame thinks running an air squadron is equal to being CinC, but it really means he was an instrument of someone else and only held rank.
Oh, on another thread I said RP and Huckster would be garnish and irrelevant in the debate. Notice how Huck and RP kept getting pushed out of the 'debate'?
Tuesday may be a surprise for JohnnyMac. It's possible none of them will have enough delgates to win th nomination.
Then anything can happen at a brokered convention.
32 posted on
01/31/2008 5:51:17 AM PST by
Pistolshot
(Those with a lively sense of curiosity learn something new every day of their lives.)
To: pissant
He may be pissin in the wind on this one. I don't think the RNC has any problem whatsoever with how things are going I would like to think they will get the point when they can no longer count on the base for contributions. However, I am not sure even that will have any effect. I know that I have not sent anything their way since 2004. I believe that most conservatives closed their wallets to the RNC long before that.
33 posted on
01/31/2008 5:52:04 AM PST by
outofstyle
(My Ride's Here)
To: pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson