Presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain upon hearing that
Rush Limbaugh would not concede the election.
Posted on 01/30/2008 8:41:09 AM PST by TSchmereL
AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, from behind the golden EIB microphone, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back — just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, Maha-Rushie! America's Anchorman, Truth Detector, and Doctor of Democracy. He is the man who runs America. He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do--That's host. Get ready to what you were born to do--That's listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
The 24/7 feed had only Edwards spoofs... so this is the 2nd time in 10mins for me.
Me too!
Presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain upon hearing that
Rush Limbaugh would not concede the election.
Take it to an offshore server... Some place in the Caribbean... Those folks can be bought to keep it up!
You’re right. Unfortunately for us, subversiveness comes naturally to the left. They learned from the best, the fifth column infiltrators. Infiltration is the natural course of action for those seeking to undermine institutions or a nation. It doesn’t come naturally to patriots.
Right.
To harmless lovable fuzzball: learn to pronounce hermosura doctrina, lol.
“Don’t take this the wrong way, but I actually dreamed about Mitt last night”
YOU’VE BEEN SMITTEN LOLOL!!!!
THAT MEANS WE'VE LOST CONTROL OF OUR NOMINATING PROCESS TO FORIEGNERS, AND FAKE AMERICANS WHO REALLY OWE THEIR ALLEGIANCE TO A FORIEGN POWER.
I’m talking about the general election. I believe that GOP voters are voting on the most electable against Hillary and Obama, not their favorite candidate.
Just linked on Hotair:
Rasmussen: McCain 48, Hillary 40; McCain 47, Obama 41
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/30/rasmussen-mccain-48-hillary-40-mccain-47-obama-41/
He asked me to create a Powerpoint presentation for him.
Are you going to do it?
That might be worth looking into.
If Hitlery gets elected, do not blame Rush. Blame the VOTERS. Using Rush as a scapegoat is just not realistic.
Sort of like the FredHeads. Some are blaming Rush for Fred's poor showing. The problems with that are:
1. Rush said on his show, before SC vote, that Fred was the most conservative person running among many other positive things Rush said about Fred.
2. Fred's poor showing was his own fault. I think his strategy of waiting so long to announce put him at a disadvantage that he just could not get out of.
...Or how we are seeing the old radio days alive now through talkradio. :)
Bibby!
Wow!! ;>)
You make an excellent point. I am of the belief, sadly, that real progress in the Conservative cause is often dependent upon harm done by the excesses of Liberalism. It was no surprise that Reagan followed Carter’s disastrous term. It takes a jolt to rouse the moderates etc. from their slumbers.
This morning I tried to locate a Romney 2008 campaign headquarters, here in "Red" Warren County. I also looked in Morris & Sussex County. I couldn't find one! Do you know where I can locate one?
We Must Stop McLaim!!!!!
He could have educated his audience with positive things about Romney.....devoting as much time to him as he spent the last three weeks talking about Hillary's crying and other red herrings.
The problem with the caller was that he picked the wrong example to bring up with Rush who seized on it like a carp after a worm, demolished the caller and extricated himself by segueing into a commercial.
Two weeks ago, I posted several times on the Rush threads how he was devoting hour after hour to Hillary-bashing. I questioned why he wasn't touting Republican principles and utilizing the tricks of the trade in obliquely helping Thompson or Romney after Fred's departure.
Rush never gave Thompson a much-needed covert nudge except once before the Iowa primary, nor the remaining primaries in FRed's short tenure as a candidate, instead choosing to concentrate on the Hillary/Obama tiffs, etc.
In the week leading up to the election yesterday, he did the same thing.....nothing positive about Romney, only McCain-bashing.
Well, I'm still a Rushhead, but I must say, I questioned his strategery three weeks ago, and I question it today.
But it's water over the dam. But now I know that Rush will tie himself in fluff-knots avoiding talking about conservative candidate when it comes down to pecan-biting for fear he'll look like he's endorsing.
Well, it is what it is, and I can't change it.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.