Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread - Wednesday 1/30/08
The EIB Network ^ | January 30, 2008 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/30/2008 8:41:09 AM PST by TSchmereL

AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, from behind the golden EIB microphone, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back — just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, Maha-Rushie! America's Anchorman, Truth Detector, and Doctor of Democracy. He is the man who runs America. He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do--That's host. Get ready to what you were born to do--That's listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elrushbo; rush; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 981-986 next last
To: Joisey
Romney is reaching out more than anybody else running to conservative voters.

I have been ratcheted from Hunter to Fred to now leaning, out of desperation, to Mitt. It's been an ugly ride. As Rush just said it's a candidate's responsibility to make his/her positions clear; and the current front runners have not made it clear that they are conservative enough for me. I will be watching.
401 posted on 01/30/2008 9:57:46 AM PST by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: bigjoesaddle

That’s to tell callers ‘you call me telling me what to do, then I tell you what to buy’.


402 posted on 01/30/2008 9:57:55 AM PST by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs /Romney '08 / Yes you will vote against Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: Bosco

Me too.
My sleep number is 40.
:)


403 posted on 01/30/2008 9:58:14 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
I find these callers who suggest Rush should do this or that (in support of their candidate, of course) tiresome.

Me too Bah.

It's so obvious they don't listen to Rush more than when he's in the news.

404 posted on 01/30/2008 9:58:24 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (WE'RE ALL DOOMED!©®™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: BRK

Rush should have that in his monologue everyday. This putrid party obviously does not understand what it does mean to be Conservative!

LLS


405 posted on 01/30/2008 9:58:35 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL
Hey, Dane.

Do I sense some contempt for Conservatives. Or just “True Conservatives,” which apparently McCain now claims to be?

Oh, those blowhards. Always talking about “Conservative” stuff. When will they ever shut up?

No I have contempt for blowhard conservatives. You all have burned bridges and now you are moaning about the damage you have wrought.

BTW, I don't how long this post will take to show up on this thread.

I have been put into FR purgatory, where every reply I write must go through a FR central bureau first.

It's about 12:55 PM EST as I hit the post button.

406 posted on 01/30/2008 9:58:39 AM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: angcat

Hey Ang :)


407 posted on 01/30/2008 9:58:41 AM PST by Fawn (Friggin Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

What do the “take a stand” folks want Rush to do? ... come out for someone he can’t unreservedly recommend? I don’t understand what the “stop waffling” contingent want him to say beyond what he’s already said.


408 posted on 01/30/2008 9:58:45 AM PST by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

They need to pass the diaper bucket to the GOP, they both are stinkin’ up the place.


409 posted on 01/30/2008 9:59:03 AM PST by dforest (Don't even ask me to vote for McCain, Rudy, or Huckster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Exactly and honestly I don't think it would affect the race anyway. Rush, Levin et al have been hammering McLame for weeks now and he still won SC an Florida. National Review endorsed Romney. That did nothing for him. Fact is there is NO candidate for Conservatives to enthusiastically get behind. Romney is the anti-McLame....less for Romney and more anti-McLame.
410 posted on 01/30/2008 9:59:09 AM PST by ejdrapes (Please don't settle on Mitt.....he's a fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Minn. 4 Bush
The main reason that we may be facing a McCain presidency is because the establishment is controlling this.

I firmly believe the reason we may be facing a McCain Presidency is the other parties candidates: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. The idea of either of those two becoming the President of the United States has scared the GOP into voting for who is most electable instead of voting for who is most deserving.
411 posted on 01/30/2008 9:59:32 AM PST by Republican Red (The word "courage" is not in the liberal vocabulary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Primetimedonna
I thought he was bringing up Rush’s unwillingness to endorse a candidate, but Rush’s response and segue into a commercial have me confused.
412 posted on 01/30/2008 9:59:33 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Hmmm... I thought Huckabee was the only “true conservative.”

Not according to Rush. He said many times there is no true conservative running.

He also said, well before South Carolina, that Thompson was the most conservative. Not a true conservative, but the most conservative.

413 posted on 01/30/2008 9:59:51 AM PST by technomage (Radical Islam gives me the urge to go to the bathroom and drop a big stinking mohammed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

Yes.

That’s exactly what Rush should do.


414 posted on 01/30/2008 9:59:56 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
You know you are a doofus when Rush morphs your call into a water-heater commercial...LOL

It's his new slam, AND I LIKE IT!

415 posted on 01/30/2008 10:00:05 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (WE'RE ALL DOOMED!©®™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL
The Hunter and Huckabee supporters are really angry with Rush.

I supported Hunter and I am NOT one bit angry with Rush.... The 'majority' will get what they want and deserve.... watch and see.

416 posted on 01/30/2008 10:00:14 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Seems strange....can understand your confusion!


417 posted on 01/30/2008 10:00:22 AM PST by Primetimedonna ( It's SAN FRANCISCO, not Frisco. Charter member of the San Francisco Snowflakes. New MITTen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Dane, do you honestly believe that?


418 posted on 01/30/2008 10:00:29 AM PST by JFC (I am now a MITTEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Dane

How is your little illegal doing??


419 posted on 01/30/2008 10:00:29 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
When hightech turns China into a free democracy, then I'll concede the point. Until then, I see technology as being much more likely to be used as a weapon against freedom. Especially in the hands of a totalitarian state.

We'll see how much technology is protecting your freedom when President Hillary orders everyone to have a homing chip implanted in them...

420 posted on 01/30/2008 10:00:36 AM PST by Joisey (Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second time-a!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 981-986 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson