Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Brilliant? New York Times, Cut the Crap!
North Star Writers Group ^
| January 28, 2008
| Herman Cain
Posted on 01/28/2008 6:05:22 AM PST by Dukes Travels
If someone is going to vote for Hillary Clinton because she is a woman, then so be it. If someone is going to vote for Barack Obama because he is black, then so be it. But for the New York Times to endorse Hillary Clinton because they consider her brilliant, and in possession of powerful intellect, is a real fairy tale.
Give me a break, please!
It is no surprise that the Times endorsed the most liberal Democrat and the most liberal Republican of the presidential contenders Hillary Clinton and John McCain. But to try to justify their predisposition toward Hillary with empty assessments of her is worse than the empty political rhetoric she uses to disguise her real lack of intellect, bad ideas and huge lack of experience.
(Excerpt) Read more at northstarwriters.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; awoodenplodder; crushclinton; democratparty; elections; hillary; hillaryclinton; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Dukes Travels
Anyone knows that the Democrat candidates, including former candidates Dennis Kucinich and Chris Dodd, are each smarter than any of the Republican candidates — according to THE new york times and AP.
To: Dukes Travels
She is so vile that her vile husband has to actually campaign in her stead. I wonder how long she can remain in the shadows while her husband runs around doing Meet the Press for her. The only brilliance is in the tactic of keeping her once again out of the way of direct criticism. Let Bill take the arrows for dirty politics while Hillary says “oh he goes to far sometimes because he loves me”
3
posted on
01/28/2008 6:10:58 AM PST
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: Dukes Travels
How did she rank in her class. Did she outscore Comrade Kerry? Did she do anything outstanding?
4
posted on
01/28/2008 6:14:02 AM PST
by
mountainlyons
(Hard core conservative)
To: Loyal Buckeye
“Anyone knows that the Democrat candidates, including former candidates Dennis Kucinich and Chris Dodd, are each smarter than any of the Republican candidates according to THE new york times and AP.
And according to Algore, Republicans have that Extra Chromosome!
5
posted on
01/28/2008 6:18:13 AM PST
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: Dukes Travels
"Hillary" is to "brilliant" as "Bill" is to "classy".
How any liberal could call her current strategy of pissing off all their minority voters "brilliant" boggles the mind. It sure is fun to watch, though.
6
posted on
01/28/2008 6:21:29 AM PST
by
Shryke
To: mountainlyons
Seems to me the Democrats have a variety of tribes: the white boy’s tribe, the black boy’s tribe, the black girl’s tribe, the white girl’s tribe, the angry black or white girl’s tribe. They are not getting along right now. None of these tribes give a hoot about what their candidate wants to do with (to) the Country. In fact, they don’t even know what they stand for. And we complain about the Sunnis, Shia and Kurds!
7
posted on
01/28/2008 6:22:01 AM PST
by
AZFolks
To: Dukes Travels
8
posted on
01/28/2008 6:22:35 AM PST
by
TexGuy
(If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
9
posted on
01/28/2008 6:23:23 AM PST
by
TexGuy
(If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
To: mountainlyons
"How did she rank in her class. Did she outscore Comrade Kerry? Did she do anything outstanding?" Besides failing her first Bar Exam?
10
posted on
01/28/2008 6:25:42 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: mountainlyons
Yeah, but she's got great kankles.
11
posted on
01/28/2008 6:26:04 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: Loyal Buckeye
Anyone knows that the Democrat candidates, including former candidates Dennis Kucinich and Chris Dodd, are each smarter than any of the Republican candidates according to THE new york times and AP. Of course the Dems are smarter. Everybody knows that the DEFINITION of smartness is "the degree to which the person agrees with the Left Wing agenda"
To: Loyal Buckeye
Aye. The NY Times defines being “brilliant” and ethical as possessing power useful for the Left.
Thus, KKK Senator Byrd is “brilliant” and ethical.
13
posted on
01/28/2008 6:30:19 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Dukes Travels
I don’t get it. If Evita is THAT brilliant, she would have realized LONG AGO that she can much more done for good OUTSIDE politics than in!
Besides, how brilliant can a woman be if she is married to the Joey Buttafuco of American politics...and stays married to him after the kind and amount of public scandal he involved himself in????
Admit it, it has nothing to do with ‘doing good’ for anyone at all and has nothing to do with serving America... it’s all about POWER and there has never been in all history ANY immediate and absolute connection between lust for power and intellect. NEVER! Lust for and acquisition of power is probably more associated with infantilism, emotional/psychological pathology and intellectual deficiency than with intellect!
14
posted on
01/28/2008 6:42:47 AM PST
by
SMARTY
(Public opinion has the power of the lie/creating it is the work of radical politicians in a democra)
To: Dukes Travels
Just don’t ask her yes or no questions at a debate or ask her about NAFTA.
15
posted on
01/28/2008 6:45:04 AM PST
by
4yearlurker
(Thanks Vets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Shryke
I think this article is a little too hard on her. Grifting is an acquired skill and she acquired it from the master. The Clintons are without question the greatest political grifters of their generation although it must be said that their generation contains an unusually high percentage of dupes.
To: Dukes Travels
To: Shryke
No more TRAILER TRASH in the White House.
To: 4yearlurker
You can’t ask her about her 1994 felony violation of the federal Open Meetings Act with Ira Magaziner.
You can’t ask her to name who she would install into her Administration.
You can’t ask her to explain felon Sandy Berger on her ‘08 campaign payroll.
You can’t ask her if she’s talked to Harold Ickes this week.
You can’t ask her to explain her husband’s 1999 bombing of Serbia.
You can’t ask her to explain her involvement at the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 near Waco.
19
posted on
01/28/2008 7:00:35 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Dukes Travels
Hillary Clinton Brilliant? New York Times, Cut the Crap!
Perhaps they believed her explanation of the Cattle Futures miracle.
20
posted on
01/28/2008 7:02:41 AM PST
by
Arkancide
(www.arkancide.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson