Skip to comments.
CLINTONS NAILED WITH REZKO; DRUDGE HAS PICTURE ('I DON'T REMEMBER MEETING REZKO' )
Matt Drudge ^
| 1/25/2008
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 01/25/2008 5:04:25 AM PST by Keith
Edited on 01/25/2008 6:01:15 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
**INTERNET EXCLUSIVE Photo surfaces of smiling Clintons with Tony Rezko... MORE... Clinton injected the indicted developer's name this week in heated debate with Obama: 'I was fighting against those ideas when you were practicing law and representing your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner city Chicago'... Clinton tells NBC 'TODAY' show on Friday: 'I probably have taken hundreds of thousands of pictures. I don't know the man. I wouldn't know him if he walked in the door'... Developing...
'I DON'T REMEMBER MEETING REZKO'
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; abramoffthis; clinton; clintonlies; corruption; crushclinton; democratparty; election; elections; fundraising; hillary; hillaryscandals; lies; rezko; slumlord; threecreeps; tonyrezco; transparency
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 401-419 next last
To: Polyxene
Her Heinous will probably claim the picture was photoshopped by B. Husseins campaign!Yeah--someone put Rezko's face on Norman Hsu's body.
121
posted on
01/25/2008 5:54:26 AM PST
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: Edward Watson
You are right, and if this was a serious discussion, that would be the appropriate response. He gave money to the DNC, maybe he gave money to Clinton, and they had a donor meet-and-shake and every donor got a picture taken.
Bush has been ripped by the democrats several times for pictures of him with Abramoff and other characters, so it’s not like they don’t play politics with pictures like this.
To: DoughtyOne
123
posted on
01/25/2008 5:55:36 AM PST
by
twigs
To: michigander
"Perhaps so. But, how much did he have to "contribute" to get that picture with them? Did they return the money?"
We all know that the Clintons don't do anything out of the goodness of their heart. There's always something in it for them. I'm sure money passed hands somewhere. It's the pattern of their life.
To: dead
125
posted on
01/25/2008 5:56:10 AM PST
by
tiredoflaundry
(I guess I'm back to square one..............)
To: mewzilla
How MUCH did REZKO give to the Clintons???????
Man, the view from atop the PETARD must be really something, eh Hillary??
126
posted on
01/25/2008 5:57:10 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: InvisibleChurch
127
posted on
01/25/2008 5:57:26 AM PST
by
Badeye
(No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
To: MindBender26
Is that the “Pretty in Pink” outfit??
128
posted on
01/25/2008 5:57:33 AM PST
by
freedomlover
(Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
To: Wolverine
Democrat Bill Clinton, James Riady & John Huang
129
posted on
01/25/2008 5:57:44 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
To: Keith
Ouch, this one will leave a mark....
But maybe they can put some ice on it :-)......
130
posted on
01/25/2008 5:57:48 AM PST
by
taildragger
(The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
To: dead
LOL!
The Clintons don’t discriminate when it comes to donations.
To: twigs
132
posted on
01/25/2008 5:58:26 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
To: Brilliant
Its obviously photoshopped.... There is an American flag in the photo. LOL, excellent point.
Seriously though, the Klintoons lie so much whatever comes out of their mouth is just the opposite. As so as they said they didn't know him, I knew they did.
133
posted on
01/25/2008 5:59:11 AM PST
by
Lurking in Kansas
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: melancholy
If the Clintons point the finger, three more point back.
Normally, one would be enough. The middle one that is!
OUCH!....thats' gonna leave a mark (not a big one, but one just the same :)
134
posted on
01/25/2008 6:00:17 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :^( FRed was LMSM roadkill)
To: mewzilla
The Blagojevitch’s seem pretty dirty also. What’s with Illinois??
135
posted on
01/25/2008 6:01:04 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Keith
hillary keeps stepping in it huh?
lol
136
posted on
01/25/2008 6:01:05 AM PST
by
mowowie
To: Lurking in Kansas
...and the NY Times will be right there to carry their water, whether it’s about the ‘private’ affairs of the President, questionable donations, or any other transgression. In their mind, this election is too important to allow these minor distractions to keep the Clintons from the White House.
To: TomGuy
they had allot of photos taken. It doesnt mean they were friends, etc. True, but this guy paid a large donation to get that photo-op. And,
If it wasn't for Obama, that guy wouldn't have been able to afford it.
138
posted on
01/25/2008 6:02:44 AM PST
by
MaxMax
To: mewzilla
"Interesting link on Rezko's backround, especially the Syrian connection."
Makes me wonder if he isn't one of those Clinton library donors whose names they don't want to make public.
To: CASchack
Let’s just hope that Obama keeps this alive.
As Jackie Gleason used to say: “How sweet it is”.
140
posted on
01/25/2008 6:03:38 AM PST
by
umgud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 401-419 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson