Posted on 01/17/2008 7:21:28 AM PST by 1rudeboy
Our current immigration troubles are almost entirely problems of success. Our challenge is to seize that success and turn it into a boon for America, rather than allow bureaucrats to turn it into yet another failure.
America has the best economy in the world. America has the greatest opportunity for hardworking people to be upwardly mobile and to dream that their children can have even better lives. America creates jobs on a scale that Europe and Japan envy. In fact, America creates more jobs than there are Americans to fill them.
|
There is a clear path to an effective immigration solution that is better for America and better for immigrants. The challenge is to get the elites to listen to the American people. |
For four hundred years, since the first European immigrants landed at Jamestown, America has attracted energetic, ambitious people from all over the world. If we adopt the right economic policies and the American economy continues to be the most productive and prosperous, we will continue to draw people from around the world.
This is a good challenge. It is better to be the country people want to join than the country people want to leave. It is better to have the highest standard of living in the neighborhood than the lowest. It is better to have hardworking, energetic, ambitious people clamoring to join you than to have them seeking desperately to leave.
However, this opportunity requires a level of honesty from our political elites that they have not delivered. There has been more demagoguery and less honest dialogue about immigration than about any other topic in the last six years. The elites desperately try to ignore the needs of the American people and close their ears to demands for reform. The American people are furious at the elites because they have lied about immigration and lied about what we need to do to fix our immigration system.
In 1986 I voted for the Simpson-Mazzoli immigration bill because we were told it would solve the problem of massive illegal immigration. In his diaries, President Ronald Reagan said he was going to sign the bill because we had to regain control of our borders. The Simpson-Mazzoli bill contained three promises:
All three promises were broken. The government has made no serious effort to control our borders. It has made no serious effort to develop and implement an effective employer verification program. There are millions more in our country illegally today (twelve to twenty million) than there were in 1986. And we are now facing yet another flurry of amnesty proposals. Today's popular anger with the elites stems from the twenty-year failure of the government to keep the promises made in the Simpson-Mazzoli bill.
There is a clear path to an effective immigration solution that is better for America and better for immigrants. The challenge is to get the elites to listen to the American people.
I owe a lot to Helen Krieble and the Krieble Foundation for their groundbreaking work in listening to the American people and trying to find a solution that meets our values and would be acceptable to the vast majority of Americans. Republican congressman Mike Pence deserves a lot of credit for working with the Krieble Foundation. Had President Bush worked with Congressman Pence and Republican senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, there might well have been a successful immigration reform bill in 2006.
Unfortunately, the Washington elites have agreed on a definition of success that is infuriating to the average American. The elites on the left oppose border control, oppose English as the official government language, oppose expanding legal immigration, and want to find a way to allow everyone here illegally to stay, all while prohibiting illegal immigration in the future. The country is convinced that this so-called solution is incompatible with American values and will weaken America's future.
In trying to force their left-wing solution on a country that rejects it, the elite have resorted to describing their critics as racist, xenophobic, unrealistic, and much worse. Those attacks are merely a sign of the elites' desperation.
Becoming American
One of the biggest gaps between the elites and the average American is on the issue of American civilization, American history, and English as the official language of government.
Elites on the left have worked furiously to eliminate American history from school curricula (or to teach contempt for a pro-America version of American history). They have opposed English as the dominant language. They have rejected assimilation into America in favor of a multicultural system with no norms. The American people reject all these attitudes as undermining American unity.
This cultural struggle over the future of America--and the very definition of America--underlies the immigration fight. The gap between the leftist elites and the rest of America could hardly be broader.
By 87 percent to 11 percent, the American people favor English as the official language of government. Even when they learn that this designation might mean no longer printing ballots or any other government document in a foreign language, they still support English as the official language by 74 percent to 23 percent.
Overwhelmingly, by 83 percent to 17 percent, Americans believe new immigrants should be required to learn English. The American people are willing to pay for their belief in English. By 83 percent to 15 percent, they would support a program offering intensive English instruction to all who need it, including stipends to help immigrants attend the program. Americans are also prepared to allow businesses to require employees to speak English while on the job (80 percent to 17 percent).
On all these topics there is a huge gap between the news media, the academic Left, and left-wing politicians on one side and the overwhelming majority of Americans on the other.
Newt Gingrich is a senior fellow at AEI.
That would be mostly your personal failure as speaker newt.
Newt became Speaker in 1994.
btt
And your point is???
People will value what they pay for, not what I pay for on their behalf.
Actually in 1995.
right, of course
I should of wrote after the 1994 election. Thanks
bttt
bttt
My point is that you are stretching when putting the failure of that legislation as mostly fault of Newt.
He was the Speaker of the House, not the President. I think that he would make an above average president of the USA in spite of his “Baggage”.
Anyway, Newt is doing very interesting thing now with his American Solutions project. He ventured to find out if there is indeed a huge 50/50 divide in the country with a hunch that its not really. In the Platform of the American People he lists unifying issues that have support of a majority of Republicans, a majority of Democrats, and a majority of independents. The list of these common issues is quite long. If any candidate adopted it, he'd be guaranteeing himself support (and maybe even vote - there are too many die hard partisans) of majority of the people. Implementation of the list would do lots of good for the country. The points of disagreements can be worked on after the points of agreement are accomplished. I'd love to see it implemented.
Maybe that he didn’t do ____ about it when he was there.
A more effective argument would be to point out that Newt ran on “The Contract With America,” which did not have border security as a major point. To try and blame him for that now is silly.
Those are your words, mine are are, that newt was there for a good many years and he did not do jack. He was one of the major problems, no leadership at all on this matter. Like in many other area's a complete failure.
“Those are your words, mine are are, that newt was there for a good many years and he did not do jack. He was one of the major problems, no leadership at all on this matter. Like in many other area’s a complete failure.”
You are exactly right, but Newt did damage as well. Before the past few months when Newt found his ‘immigration legs’, he was doing all he could with his open border buddies to push Bush’s amnesty. He also as a congressman in Georgia stopped workplace enforcement.
[snip]
Moore, along with Norquist, Newt Gingrich, Tamar Jacoby and other amnesty advocates penned a letter to the Wall St Journal proclaiming Bush’s guest worker plan as “a humane, orderly, and economically sensible approach to migration.”
Newt Gingrich, Conservative? NOT on immigration!
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2007/02/newt-gingrich-conservative-not-on.html
What is Newt thinking when he suggests working with Kay Bailey Hutchison on immigration?
Kay Bailey Hutchison just gutted the border fence and Newt thinks working with her is key to a successful immigration plan?
If we want a truly successful immigration plan we need to send Kay Bailey Hutchison back home to bake cookies.
ping
That was a head-scratcher to me as well. He must be referring to something she proposed during that period.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.