There's a single shot AR variant as well.
DPMS Panther Single shot
The Pump version
"No pistol grip version" stock from California Rifles.
Fixed Magazine version (from CaliforniaBushmaster)
Posted on 01/14/2008 5:41:31 AM PST by servantboy777
Since "unrestricted' private ownership of guns clearly threatens the public safety, the 2nd Amendment can be interpreted to allow a variety of gun restrictions, according to the Bush administration.
The argument was delivered by U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement in a brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in the ongoing arguments over the legality of a District of Columbia ban on handguns in homes, according to a report from the Los Angeles Times.
Clement suggested that gun rights are limited and subject to "reasonable regulation" and said all federal limits on guns should be upheld.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
Yeah, me too!
I remember waking up a few years ago to let my puppy out while visiting in Florida. I noticed one early morning, what looked like lightening through the blinds where we were staying.
I peeked outside just in time to catch the action across the street as black masked, heavily armed, small army descended upon this house.
They ultimately removed one sleeping biker and his lady friend for drugs.
I thought to myself....why the hell did they need that much force and why were they dressed like paramilitary?
By in large the republican party has supported Bush.....now that’s scary.
The GOP is NOT the party I have supported in the past. They’ll have a hard time garnering my support in the future unless they start moving conservative once again.
Ours will be a higher number than the entirety of the last century.
Ammo would be better measured in tonnage.
Did you notice the balaclava covered both of his eyes and his mouth?
Oh my God I think I’m in love.
Heck, 4 regular Army guys could replace a dozen SWAT. Easily
I didn’t try anything in 2006. I voted and I don’t vote third party. However, what we are currently doing, and have done for the past 15 years, isn’t working. Sometimes, radical surgery is called for.
Are you through being hysterical yet? Are you done being condescending and arrogant?
There's a single shot AR variant as well.
DPMS Panther Single shot
The Pump version
"No pistol grip version" stock from California Rifles.
Fixed Magazine version (from CaliforniaBushmaster)
Yes, but only one of them. For the typc of scrutiny the DoJ says is appropriate for the second amendment, heightened security, it's the *only* one required.
There's a fellow calling himself "tmoore45acp" posting on the CMP Forums who claims he's got 191,000 rounds loaded and another 72,000 cases waiting to be loaded.
Since “unrestricted’ private ownership of guns
clearly threatens the public “Masters” safety,
they must be restricted to public officials,
police, military and a few hunters./S
Even in the USSR, some hunters were allowed
single shot smooth bores with type and quantity
of ammunition restricted.
Enfield magazines are removable, but typically they aren’t removed; they are loaded from the top, either singly or by stripper-clips.
Actually of all the abortions constructed to get around the California ban, I think I'd like the pump the best. You can do aimed fire with a pump pretty much as fast as you can a semi-auto, with a little practice. And you don't have to give up the other stuff, like the pistol grip, the flash hider, and even the evil bayonet lug. Clearing jams is easier too.
But maybe I'm prejudiced, since I for a long time the only guns I owned were pump action shotguns. I'd shot .22 semi-auto rifles before then, but I didn't own them as I did the shotguns (from age 14 up to my present advanced age). Of course since the 5.56 doesn't recoil much you don't take as long for the follow up aimed shots, like one does with a 12 gauge, double, pump, or autoloader. (Actually my very first shotgun, which was only borrowed until Christmas when I got the pump, was a bolt action 16 gauge, follow up shots when wing shooting with that beast was a challenge. I didn't get a single bird with it. :) )
Which for some reason I can't get to show up.
But here's the link to the DPMS Panther single shot
I might have to read it again to comment confidently.
But I thought that the "reasonable regulation" claim was equivalent to "rational basis"; that is, the government need only show that there is a reason for the law. It isn't even necessary to show that the law would be effective.
"Compelling state interest" would at least create a burden on the state to demonstrate that the laws are effective. I'm certainly not aware of any felon who decided not to commit another crime because he couldn't get a gun. How would one prove that a waiting period was beneficial without considering both the cooling off effect, if any, and the effect of denying a person a needed weapon for days.
Even the machinegun ban fails, since the number of crimes committed prior to the ban on manufacture was miniscule.
Yeah, that’s exactly what I was thinking.
Can you describe one?
I thought that a pump-action required a blunt-nosed round so that the rounds could be lined up without a primer being hit by the point of another round. Is there such a "blunt-nosed" .223? How many rounds can such a pump .223 hold?
All your guns belong to us!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.