Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/09/2008 11:33:50 AM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 01/09/2008 11:34:03 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Take that! Digital Divide.

Of course, such innovations won’t stop a President Hillary of Obama from creating another Rural Internetification Authority but it’s nice to have...


3 posted on 01/09/2008 11:37:42 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I’m not all the worried about speed. Try improving the latency times. You can have a 10 GB connection, but if the lag time between me clicking on a link and the information being sent to me is 2 minutes, it doesn’t feel very fast.


4 posted on 01/09/2008 11:41:00 AM PST by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

But will I get a $40.00 coupon from the government for the equipment?

;)


5 posted on 01/09/2008 11:41:26 AM PST by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
Dankberg said the satellite could handle Internet traffic in both directions, so customers could send, or upload, data at speeds comparable to cable and DSL. Some satellite systems send data in one direction only, meaning customers need a regular - and slow - dial-up modem for uploading.

I had satellite for about four years because of my location. It's head and shoulders above dial-up.

It will never be comparable to DSL or Cable (or even rural wireless, which is another alternative they failed to mention) because of one thing: Latency

Latency keeps you from doing (or hinders greatly) stuff like:


6 posted on 01/09/2008 11:43:24 AM PST by Egon ("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
This would be great - we only have dialup here, unless we spend major dollars.

Carolyn

7 posted on 01/09/2008 11:46:28 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
"Dankberg said the satellite could handle Internet traffic in both directions, so customers could send, or upload, data at speeds comparable to cable and DSL."

So consumer satellite dishes are powerful enough to send data to something in orbit? I didn't know this was possible.

8 posted on 01/09/2008 11:47:21 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
Honestly, I fear for the future of this country. Every transaction, almost all commerce, most all documents depend on the Internet. Can you fathom what would happen if all or part of the Internet was knocked out by a foreign enemy? Scary.
9 posted on 01/09/2008 11:51:16 AM PST by Obadiah (I don't like to brag - but I'm half bilingual!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

That’s nice, but you’re still going to have a 250ms minimum ping time, rendering this USELESS for online gaming.


10 posted on 01/09/2008 11:51:56 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
There is a theoretical signalling symbol limit for every communications channel, that cannot be exceed. It's called the Shannon limit.
12 posted on 01/09/2008 11:53:22 AM PST by Tarpon (Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
A satellite due to launch in three years promises to expand high-speed Internet services to rural Americans who cannot get access through cable or phone companies.


17 posted on 01/09/2008 12:12:05 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
I am on Wildblue and had good luck with it has a much better Fap policy than Dirctway. The biggest problem is the weather. When it storms you better watch TV unless that is Sat also.LOL
28 posted on 01/09/2008 2:03:37 PM PST by amigatec (Carriers make wonderful diplomatic statements. Subs are for when diplomacy is over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
I am also stuck with you know what, however verizon is going to plant a cell tower in my back yard, so I am looking forward to trying evdo.
33 posted on 01/09/2008 3:11:21 PM PST by dialup (28800 on a good day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
Satellite will be a great way to get broadband Internet - in Africa.

In the United States, we should be installing fiber optic cable to every home, school and business.

35 posted on 01/09/2008 9:22:34 PM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson