Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
Dankberg said the satellite could handle Internet traffic in both directions, so customers could send, or upload, data at speeds comparable to cable and DSL. Some satellite systems send data in one direction only, meaning customers need a regular - and slow - dial-up modem for uploading.

I had satellite for about four years because of my location. It's head and shoulders above dial-up.

It will never be comparable to DSL or Cable (or even rural wireless, which is another alternative they failed to mention) because of one thing: Latency

Latency keeps you from doing (or hinders greatly) stuff like:


6 posted on 01/09/2008 11:43:24 AM PST by Egon ("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Egon

Exactly. Latency is a huge killer. I would never use sat broadband unless I absolutely had to.


11 posted on 01/09/2008 11:52:49 AM PST by Obadiah (I don't like to brag - but I'm half bilingual!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Egon

I believe the major problem with VPN and satellites is that in order to get the speed satellite compresses/encodes, and since the VPN data is encrypted, it can’t do anything to compress it and speeds crawl to dialup.

I read somewhere some time ago of a method to get around this. I believe in involved creating tunnels on both ends instead of using PPTP.


25 posted on 01/09/2008 1:48:58 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson