To: ShadowAce
Dankberg said the satellite could handle Internet traffic in both directions, so customers could send, or upload, data at speeds comparable to cable and DSL. Some satellite systems send data in one direction only, meaning customers need a regular - and slow - dial-up modem for uploading. I had satellite for about four years because of my location. It's head and shoulders above dial-up.
It will never be comparable to DSL or Cable (or even rural wireless, which is another alternative they failed to mention) because of one thing: Latency
Latency keeps you from doing (or hinders greatly) stuff like:
- Online Gaming
- VPN
- Web 2.0 sites (depending)
6 posted on
01/09/2008 11:43:24 AM PST by
Egon
("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
To: Egon
Exactly. Latency is a huge killer. I would never use sat broadband unless I absolutely had to.
11 posted on
01/09/2008 11:52:49 AM PST by
Obadiah
(I don't like to brag - but I'm half bilingual!)
To: Egon
I believe the major problem with VPN and satellites is that in order to get the speed satellite compresses/encodes, and since the VPN data is encrypted, it can’t do anything to compress it and speeds crawl to dialup.
I read somewhere some time ago of a method to get around this. I believe in involved creating tunnels on both ends instead of using PPTP.
25 posted on
01/09/2008 1:48:58 PM PST by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson