[Servant of the Cross]

A coalition of "family leaders" felt strongly enough about Mitt Romney's record to sign this letter about what they consider to be his "deceptive rhetoric".

[AmericanMade1776]

I suppose you are for Hucky, who has a Cross in every picture he is in, except the one I saw of him last night in the “triple wide” yeller coat in front of a triple wide trailer film clip on Jay Leno , playing his gittar, breaking a picket line, looking very Clintonesque.

[JohnnyZ]

Romney's a fraud, film on YouTube.

Of course, anyone who still believes him at this point would not be convinced if he sprouted devil horns.

[Greg F]

Second, according to the letter, "Romney told Catholic Charities' adoption and foster agency they had to give children to homosexuals even when normal mother-father families were lined up to give them a home," the letter said.

Combine this with Romney's support for gay scoutmasters. You get a low-life that shouldn't be considered for the Presidency.

[dblshot]

“Most of us are not allied with any presidential candidate”

My BS meter just pegged. Yeah they probably never even heard of that Babtist preacher running against this Mormon.

[Afronaut]

You have to believe in Fairy Tales to think that Romney is the real deal. He is the definition of a fraud.

[Leisler]

Mitt’s pro-life, except when he is marching with MLK and hunting or being a resident of Utah or Massachusetts depending upon home state deductions and if he can get an illegal to tend the estate. Other than that he is a Reagan disavowing and not that Reagan is dead, claiming he is the heir to Reagan( Mitt must of saved Reagan after death ). If you don’t understand how this makes Willard the true conservative then you are a defacto Mitt hater. Confess.

[MaestroLC]

"Most of us are not allied with any presidential candidate," the letter says. "But we are troubled by the unethical and Orwellian cover-up of Mitt Romney's role in catastrophic events in Massachusetts, once the cradle of American liberty.

What a pack of lies. They are not allied with any candidate, but then attack Mitt, call him "Orwellian"? Did they even read the book?? They are not "family leaders", these lunatics are hypocrites. I have my problems with Mitt's liberal record, and he needs to account for them. My guy is FRed. But it's self-serving rhetoric by these so-called "family leaders" that make me want vomit. This smacks of Huckabee/Clinton politics. I wouldn't be surprised if Huck's fingerprints are on this.

[Scotsman will be Free]

The only “family leaders” I recognize around here are my wife and me.

[Saundra Duffy]

blah blah blah yada yada yada. Get over yourselves already. Everyone knows the Romney’s are a great uplifting wholesome wonderful family.

[ejonesie22]

Yes, that is one of several GOP factions that are having issues with Mitt. Will soon become a non issue as his cost per vote has far exceeded manageable proportions for the GOP money boys anyways.

[Colofornian]

"Mitt Romney established abortion as a 'healthcare benefit' in his own government-run healthcare plan at $50 per abortion – after his supposed 'pro-life conversion,'" the letter said. "He created a permanent, official government role for an unelected Planned Parenthood representative on the health care board."

So, all in the name of insuring just 7% of the MA pop (their rate is low compared to most states), he gives Planned Parenthood a permanent sentry post imbedded into the "health"care system...and ensures that taxpayers are spending even more $ to kill pre-borns with their subsidy.

[Badeye]

I have no use for anyone that aspires to the title of ‘family issues leader’.

In my experience, those are the exact types that have a ‘wide stance’ in public restrooms.....

[Earthdweller]

[Larry Lucido]

I don’t like Mitt and I’m not crazy about Huck, but I missed the election where we picked “family leaders.” Why does no one tell me these things??

[Antoninus]

I'd vote for McCain or Huck, though holding my nose.

I was in Massachusetts when Romney ran against Ted Kennedy in 1994. He ran a putrid and disgraceful campaign, trying to out-liberal the uber-lib himself.

That any so-called conservative would consider voting for this guy is a sign that they may not be serious about their core principles.

[HereInTheHeartland]

Romney displays what Peggy Noonan calls the difference between conservatives and Republicans, in my opinion.

Some Republicans are fine with compromising on certain social type issues.
Voters just need to decide what core values are important in a candidate.

[AmericanMade1776]

Family Values in Action

[greyfoxx39]

From the article: Signers include William Greene of RightMarch.com, Ted Baehr of the Christian Film and Television Commission, Linda Harvey of Mission America, Gary Glenn of American Family Association of Michigan, Michael Heath of Christian Civic League of Maine, Ray Neary of Pro-Life Massachusetts and others.

Other signers include John O'Gorman of Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Peter LaBarbera of Republicans for Family Values, Diane Gramley of American Family Association of Pennsylvania, John Haskins of The Parents' Rights Coalition, Gregg Jackson of the "Pundit Review," William Cotter of Operation Rescue Boston, Brian Camenker of MassResistance, Mark Charalambous of CPF-Father Coalition Massachusetts, Judge Ned Kirby, the former assistant minority leader in the Massachusetts Senate and Edgar Kelley, former assistant U.S. Attorney in Massachusetts.

More than a handful, I'd say.

[big'ol_freeper]

Mitt is only a disaster to Republicans. If he wins the nomination liberals should be jumping for joy since either way they will have a liberal president.

U.S. Army Retired