Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting the Story Straight (Fred corrects MSM)
Red State ^ | Fred Thompson

Posted on 12/30/2007 10:31:17 AM PST by Sir Gawain

Getting the Story Straight

By Fred Thompson

Every once in a while I am more thankful than ever for today’s technology which allows me to talk to you directly instead of having to go through the filter of the main stream media.

Some of them are intent on making the outcome of the campaign dependent upon their pre-conceived notions. Every once in a while their incomplete and slanted coverage makes this clear.

Today I had this story written about me regarding what I said at a Town Hall event in Burlington, Iowa by a reporter who wasn’t even at the event. Incidentally, I declined to be interviewed by this particular reporter yesterday for reasons which will soon be apparent.

In referring to me, she reported “he doesn’t like modern campaigning, isn’t interested in running for President, and will not be devastated” if he doesn’t win.

Below is a transcript of what I actually said in response to a question by a local Burlington resident which was the basis of the reporter’s story.

It is clear that there are those in the media who will exact a high price for candor and from those whom they consider to be insufficiently ambitious. But it is with increasing amazement that we see that those who are willing to slant or leave out important parts of a story to make their point.

If a candidate succumbs to this he will be reduced to nothing more than a sound bite machine.

As for me I am going to continue to say exactly what is in my heart and is on my mind and give straight and honest answers to those who ask straight and honest questions.

Incidentally, the audience in Burlington broke into applause in the middle of my answer. The reporter wouldn’t know that because she wasn’t even there.

The transcript is below the fold . . .

Q: (Courtesy ABC News) My only problem with you and why I haven’t thrown all my support behind you is that I don’t know if you have the desire to be President. If I caucus for you next week, are you still going to be there two months from now?

That is a very good question, not because it’s difficult to answer, but I’m gonna answer it in a little different way than what you might expect.

In the first place, I got into the race about the time people normally get into get into it. The fact of the matter is people get into it a lot earlier than they used to. For some of them, they were juniors in high school.

The first place, I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t. I wouldn’t be doing this. I grew up in very modest circumstances. I left government and I and my family have made sacrifices to be sitting here today. I haven’t had any income for a long time because I figured to be clean, you’ve got to cut everything off. I was doing speaking engagements and I had a contract to do a tv show. I had a contract with abc radio…and so forth. A man would have to be a total fool to do all those things and to be leaving his family which is not a joyful thing if he didn’’t want to do it.

I am not consumed by personal ambition. I will not be devastated if I don’t do it. I want the people to have the best president they can have.

When this talk first originated from people around the country both directly and through polls, liked the idea of me stepping up and of course, you always look better form a distance.

But most of those people are still there. I approached it from the standpoint of a deal. A kind of a marriage. If one side of a marriage really has to be talked into the marriage, it probably ain’t going to be a good deal. But if you mutually decide it’s going to be a good thing. In this case, if you think this is a good thing for the country, then we have an opportunity to do some wonderful things together.

I’m offering myself up. I’m saying that I have the background, the capability and concern to do this and do it for the right reasons. I’m not particularly interested in running for president, but I think I’d make a good president.

Nowadays, the process has become much more important than it used to be.

I don’t know that they ever asked George Washington a question like this. I don’t know that they ever asked Dwight D. Eisenhower a question like this. But nowadays, it’s all about fire in the belly. I’m not sure in the world we live in today it’s a good thing if a president has too much fire in the belly. I approach life differently than a lot of people. People, I guess, wonder how I’ve been as successful as I’ve been in everything that I’ve done. I won two races in TN by 20 point margins in a state that bill Clinton carried twice. I’ve never had an acting lesson. I guess that’s obvious by people who’ve watched me…

When I did it, I did it. Wasn’t just a lark. Anything that’s worth doing is worth doing well. But I’ve always been a little more laid back than most. I’m only consumed by very, very few things. Politics is not one of them. The welfare of our country and our kids and grandkids is one of them.

If people really want in their president super type-a personality, someone who has gotten up every morning and gone to bed every night and been thinking about for years how they win the presidency of the united states, someone who can look you straight in the eye and say they enjoy every minute of campaigning, I ain’t that guy. So I hope I’ve discussed that and didn’t talk you out of anything. I honestly want – I can’t imagine a worse set of circumstances [than] achieving the Presidency of the United States under false pretenses. I go out of my way to be myself.



TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: an amused spectator

Thanks. Those were the days, my friend....


61 posted on 12/30/2007 7:08:20 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

That’s ok, it was a meaningless comparison, anyway.


62 posted on 12/30/2007 8:06:53 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Whatever you do, don't watch the original National Treasure movie.

Constitutionalists may see the following script lines in a very unsettling way:

Gates: Of all the words written here about freedom, there's a line here that's at the heart of all the others.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government and provide new guards for their future security."

People don't talk that way any more.

Poole: Beautiful, huh? No idea what you said.

Gates: It means, if there's something wrong, those who have the ability to take action have the responsibility to take action.

===================

You don't want to be thinking on THAT one too much...

63 posted on 12/30/2007 8:14:47 PM PST by an amused spectator (AGW: If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a research lab, you never know what you'll find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

I wish the undecided voters would watch the interview at the C-SPAN link below, and then read the transcript (no video yet) of Fred’s interview with Chris Wallace. I believe it would help them to realize that Fred is the man we need in the White House! GO FRED!

Campaign stop in Iowa: Scroll down page to video.
http://www.c-span.org/VideoArchives.asp?CatCodePairs=,&ArchiveDays=100&Page=2

Transcript of Fox News Sunday interview:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319053,00.html


64 posted on 12/30/2007 8:20:48 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
It means, if there's something wrong, those who have the ability to take action have the responsibility to take action.

Well, he took the elegance of an nth generation fighter jet, abstracted from it the principles of flight, which he then presented in terms of a $29.95 rubber-band driven balsa wood plane kit and then claimed both are basically the same. But it's the differences that make the difference.
65 posted on 12/30/2007 9:06:00 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Je ne compris pas, nth generationaly speaking. ;-)
66 posted on 12/30/2007 9:30:58 PM PST by an amused spectator (AGW: If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a research lab, you never know what you'll find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

The voters of Iowa are much to intelligent to discount Fred with polling numbers as low as you claim.

“The voters of IA and NH have figured this out. 1-2% in IA, 3% in NH, and out.”

So where did you get those phony polling numbers?


67 posted on 12/31/2007 5:45:26 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

They are touting Mushmouth Novak’s hitpiece numbers that seemingly were made up out of whole cloth.


68 posted on 12/31/2007 5:49:51 AM PST by commonguymd (Move it to the right -Vote for Fred! Filler' up at www.fred08.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
" Yes, modesty and humility are underrated in the days of celebrities flashing their privates to the cameras. Let's return to what makes great men into leaders."

The Bible says that God resist the proud, but gives grave to the humble.
69 posted on 12/31/2007 7:00:57 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

I will wager you $1 that he will get less than 5% in IA and in NH (so $2 is at stake). Let’s just leave it at that.


70 posted on 12/31/2007 9:51:16 AM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

I see your wager and raise you $100.


71 posted on 12/31/2007 3:28:08 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
always though Mike Huckabee looked like the disgraced President Charles Logan on the series “24.” Am I the only one that sees the physical resemblance?

No you are not. I have seen the resemblance myself, in fact, when watching '24' I commented on how much Logan looked like Nixon. And since then I have thought that Huckabee looked like Logan/Nixon. Creepy.

72 posted on 12/31/2007 4:28:33 PM PST by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

I’d love to take your money, but my religion limits my wagers to either $1 or dinner or a drink. So #1 it is.


73 posted on 12/31/2007 7:30:55 PM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

He overgeneralized to the point of losing the distinctive features.


74 posted on 01/02/2008 12:13:51 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

“We need a President whom will confront the MSM!”

Ain’t that the truth! And, not only that, but confront the Democrats, and even those within his own party! We desperately need a REAL leader like Fred Thompson.


75 posted on 01/02/2008 12:34:56 AM PST by LibertyRocks (Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard
I will wager you $1 that he will get less than 5% in IA and in NH (so $2 is at stake). Let’s just leave it at that

You're willing to pay $1 for being caught posting phony polls? Yeah, I bet you'd like to leave it at that!

What were you thinking?

Yuk...we've been slimed

76 posted on 01/02/2008 1:09:35 AM PST by 4woodenboats (DefendOurMarines.com - exonerate in 0-8!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats

I think your wooden boats have sunk.


77 posted on 01/02/2008 7:30:28 AM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

Fred caucus results; 13% in Iowa, finishing 3rd. Send your dollar to Fred08.com

Have a nice day! :)


78 posted on 01/04/2008 7:36:07 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats; mbraynard

I told him to send his $1 to Fred08.com. Since Fred finished with 13%. Have a great day!

o_Z


79 posted on 01/04/2008 7:38:35 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Let us wait for the NH results so we can figure out if it is $2 or $0. Besides, Fred pays (I’m going to guess) between $0.25 and $3 as a fee for each online contribution, so it’s better for him and no worse for me if I ‘bundle’ it.


80 posted on 01/04/2008 10:15:31 AM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson