'Muhammad boys' prove 'Islam will enter every house in Europe'

WND ^ | 12-19-2007 | Aaron Klein

[A_Former_Democrat]

And yet the band plays on.

[Andrew Byler]

The Ottomans were anything but Islamic fundementalists. The Fundies in WWI were the Hashemites of Jordan and Saudi.

[Andrew Byler]

I guess everyone read and believed Paul Ehrlich’s “The Population Bomb” except the Muslims.

To populate is to govern!

Beat the Muzzies at their own game, have more babies!

[Antoninus]

2.7% hardly "proves Islam is becoming the majority in the UK", unless "million-man math" is being used.

How's this for math. When 40% of the kids in your schools are Muslim, as is the case in some areas of the Netherlands right now, what do you think their country is going to look like in 20 years?

That 2.7% will grow exponentially considering they're the ones reproducing and the ordinary Brits who make up 90% can't be bothered.

[Clemenza]

This is the straight result of the active secularism of free-masons

Have you ever looked on the back of the dollar bill? ;-)

[B-Chan]

I don’t care if Mexicans “take over” as long as they are American “mexicans” who were born or naturalized here. Mexicans are Christians. Yes, there are some serious cultural problems, but most of those are the result of class differences between the people who jump the border (who are mostly from the lower class) and the average American. These problems could be done away with by deporting the illegals. Middle-class and ambitious working-class Mexicans who emigrate here legally are by and large good citizens, and they are welcome in my county, town, and neighborhood.

As for Muslims: I don’t trust them. I wish them no ill, and I feel for the good ones that just want to live in peace, but I don’t trust them. Their culture is incompatible with ours. Ideally, we’d deport them all, but that would require a constitutional amendment (or a state of martial law).

[RetiredArmy]

Well, you are free to your opinion as I am mine. You can have yours, and I will stick to mine.

[EBH]

According to data from CACI Information Solutions, men who are named Mohammed are five-and-a-half times more likely to go on holiday in Asia and twice as likely to live in Yorkshire than most other people.

They are also among the most likely to have a digital TV, to live in a household with six or more people and to shop at Asda.

Additionally, a man named Mohammed is most likely to be aged between 25 and 34, have an average salary of £25,000 and will tend to read The Guardian.

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/book_of_names/article1183264.ece

[B-Chan]

Of course. The difference between my opinion and yours is that mine is correct and yours is not. But, as you say, you have the right to your own opinion, no matter how incorrect it may be. Aprende español, amigo.

[tpanther]

concentration camps? Not hardly...they won’t bother with all that hassle.

Just multiply all the Daniel Pearl’s and Nick Berg’s by the millions.

[tacticalogic]

The Ottomans were anything but Islamic fundementalists. The Fundies in WWI were the Hashemites of Jordan and Saudi.

the reference was more to the immediate post-war years. Ataturk's refomation of Turkish society under a secular governnment, and rejection of traditional Islamic theocracy.

[RetiredArmy]

Oh, wow, I have never met Mr. Perfect before. Yea, right, you are always right and everyone else is wrong. Sure Mr. Perfect, the only thing you are right about is how wrong you always are. Bean head. You think you are something damned special or something. Right. Sure, Mr. Know It All, Bowinkle J. Moose. That is who you are. Mr. Moose. Turd head.

[B-Chan]

[RetiredArmy]

Your showing your liberalism now bean head. I rest my case. You’ve proven it for me. Thanks Bowinkle J. Goodbye, last note to you. You are not worth the effort BJ. Go back to DU coward.

[RetiredArmy]

Oh, and I saw your OTHER THAN HONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE U.S. NAVY on your personal page after I made my last post. Long story you say??? No, it was not a long story. It is rather short. You broke the law, the rules or were a failure. Other Than Honorable discharges are given out to those who either did wrong, broke the rules, broke the law, or were utter failures. Mostly, OTH discharges are given to those under charges in a Courts Martial for offenses. They give OTH's to move you on out and get rid of you instead of wasting the money to try you in the court. Simple process, YOU ADMIT YOUR GUILT, as part of the process. Thusly, you got kicked out of the United States Navy as being either unfit, or possible criminal offenses. Which ever, it proves you couldn't cut it or you broke the rules or the law.

In either event, you are not worth my time to argue with further. I stand by my last comment to you in the last post. Coward. Couldn't cut it or you broke the law or the rules. Simple as that. You are not worth the effort. I will spend my time with real heroes. Something you failed to be. You couldn't cut being one of us.

[B-Chan]

You broke the law, the rules or were a failure.

I don't deny it.

[sheik yerbouty]

There is always defenestration if needed..