Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Alimony Die a Quick Death?
Pajama Media ^ | December 19, 2007 | Helen Smith

Posted on 12/19/2007 9:56:44 AM PST by PurpleMan

"...in today’s world, in which women have fought for the right to equality, alimony seems more like a kid getting an allowance from daddy and I believe it should be abolished altogether except for extremely dire circumstances where a spouse is older, cannot work at all, and for only a short term period. No man or woman should be held to being a slave to an ex-spouse after a marriage ends. That said, if we are going to have alimony laws, I believe that men and women should be held to an equal standard under the law."

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: alimony; divorce; ex; marines; marriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last
Excellent point.
1 posted on 12/19/2007 9:56:45 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Equal rights! Amen!


2 posted on 12/19/2007 10:01:15 AM PST by mosquitobite (If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Hell yeah!


3 posted on 12/19/2007 10:02:03 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Yes!
In fact, men should by default get child custody and women be forced to pay child support.

Single-mothers do a notoriously bad job of raising children. There are even names for children without fathers such as bast@rd.

Men, on the other hand, do a remarkably good job as single parents.

The prisons are full of people who were raised without a father - yet the kids raised without a mother are usually fine.


4 posted on 12/19/2007 10:03:22 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Right-O!
Much akin to the now antiquated “custom” of ‘tipping’ waitpersons, as well as every Tom, Dick, and Harriet who crosses our path.

And this system is taken advantage of by the IRS, all of gub-mint, employers, the tippees themselves, etc., etc.


5 posted on 12/19/2007 10:03:43 AM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

Ya think the military might change their iron-clad, Byzantine and unfair law of giving spouses a percentage of a servicemember’s retirement?

Doubtful.


6 posted on 12/19/2007 10:03:46 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
I believe that men and women should be held to an equal standard under the law."

A more important development would be to give men the same authority in determining for themselves, whether they will become a parent. Currently the woman can take the decision for the man during a pregnancy, that she will carry to term and encumber him financially against his explicit wishes. While I am adamantly against abortion unless to save the actual life of the mother, fairness dictates a man should be able to perform a legal abortion should the woman decide to deliver, which would release him from financial liability and prohibit his involvement.

7 posted on 12/19/2007 10:04:36 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Fine by mean, but if the wife stays at home throughout most of her productive working life while the husband puts in the hours to get promoted and a better standard of living, is the woman supposed to start her career at 40 at minimum wage with no work skills???


8 posted on 12/19/2007 10:04:45 AM PST by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
My Brother in Law’s ex-wife got $12,000 per month for almost 5 years after his divorce. She died in a motorcycle accident.

I didn’t know whether to offer condolences or pop a bottle of champaign when the news came one evening.

I understand there were multiple empty bottles at his and sister's home the next morning!

9 posted on 12/19/2007 10:05:24 AM PST by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
No fault divorce has killed most alimony. Child support is the modern way for a man to be made slave to the women. Republicans went along with it thinking those welfare Dad’s would be forced to pay instead of welfare. But the poor dad just went underground with the illegals and now the middle class mother has the same incentive to destroy the family as the poor ones got in the 1960s with welfare rights. Feminists were in heaven over using Republicans hatred for welfare dads to get them to pull the trigger.
10 posted on 12/19/2007 10:06:44 AM PST by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Actually there is legal precedent for an ex-spouse to get a percentage of their partner’s retirement based on the time they were actually married. Google ‘QDRO’ for more information.
Idea being that if two were married for, say, 20 years and one spouse stayed home to take care of the kids and then gets dumped, they sacrificed their livelihood for the good of the household and should have a stake in the retirement egg they supported the other in getting.
As an ex-Pension Administrator, I think this is fine...as long as its adjusted for the amount of time a couple were married.


11 posted on 12/19/2007 10:06:45 AM PST by dyed_in_the_wool ("O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends" - Koran 5.51)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

depends on who initiates the divorce....if the woman wants out of the marriage, then get out and make it on your own


12 posted on 12/19/2007 10:07:39 AM PST by joe fonebone (When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
is the woman supposed to start her career at 40 at minimum wage with no work skills???

Having no skills doesn't seem to be a problem with most women in the workforce.

13 posted on 12/19/2007 10:07:44 AM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

RE “ is the woman supposed to start her career at 40 at minimum wage with no work skills???”

I agree and thats what no-fault divorce got us. Once the kids are overage the husband can dump his wife.


14 posted on 12/19/2007 10:08:35 AM PST by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
While I am adamantly against abortion unless to save the actual life of the mother, fairness dictates a man should be able to perform a legal abortion should the woman decide to deliver, which would release him from financial liability and prohibit his involvement.

the irony being that if a man forces an abortion, its murder.
15 posted on 12/19/2007 10:09:05 AM PST by absolootezer0 (white male christian hetero married gun toting SUV driving motorcycle riding conservative smoker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool

if ... one spouse stayed home

In many cases “if” is not important.


16 posted on 12/19/2007 10:09:45 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
Actually, I'm only thinking about a legal abortion which would halt his own parental rights and responsibilities, but leave intact the mother's. Unlike what currently happens when a man wants to keep his child and the mother elects to abort.
17 posted on 12/19/2007 10:12:27 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

The sooner the better!


18 posted on 12/19/2007 10:13:17 AM PST by BubbaBasher (WWW.TWFRED08.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear

A friend had to pay spousal support to her useless, jobless, fat, violent ex-husband. The court ruled that since she had worked two jobs to support him while they were married, she should continue to work two jobs to support him once they were divorced.


19 posted on 12/19/2007 10:13:37 AM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
..., but if the husband stays at home throughout most of his productive working life while the wife puts in the hours to get promoted and a better standard of living, is the man supposed to start his career at 40 at minimum wage with no work skills??????
20 posted on 12/19/2007 10:13:52 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson