Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas defends new $5-per-visitor strip club fee
Houston Chronicle/AP ^ | Dec. 18, 2007

Posted on 12/18/2007 3:20:17 PM PST by SwinneySwitch

AUSTIN — The state's new $5 surcharge for strip club visitors will not violate the clubs' First Amendment free speech rights, state officials argued in a court brief filed in advance of a court hearing.

The new fee, which was approved this year by the Texas Legislature, is set to take effect on Jan. 1. It's expected to raise about $44 million to be dispersed for sexual assault prevention programs and health care for the uninsured.

A state district judge was scheduled today to consider a request made by a group of strip clubs to delay the fee.

The Texas Entertainment Association and Karpod, Inc., the operator of an Amarillo club, sued Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and Comptroller Susan Combs earlier this month.

The clubs say the fee would amount to an unconstitutional tax on nude dancing, a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. They also said the measure unfairly targets strip clubs, while not including modeling studios and adult video arcades.

"If the State has a compelling interest in assisting victims of sexual assault, that interest cannot be supported by taxing constitutionally protected speech based on content, even if the speech is nude entertainment that society may find offensive or disagreeable," the plaintiffs said in their lawsuit.

In a brief filed Monday, Abbott and Combs countered that the fee "does not prohibit nude dancing, does not dictate where live nude entertainment may be presented, does not require any minimum clothing and does not govern the physical setting for the activity."

If the judge agrees to delay the fee, it would open the door for the lawsuit to be considered in a trial.

Supporters decried the possibility that the funds generated by the fee could be withheld.

Annette Burrhus-Clay, executive director of the Texas Association Against Sexual Assault, said the state lacks resources to keep up with the demand for sexual assault prevention, research, intervention and treatment for offenders.

"The issue for us is an apples-to-apples issue," said state Rep. Ellen Cohen, D-Houston, author of the bill that created the fee. "This is an industry that largely employs women. It's an opportunity to do something for crimes that largely affect women."

An attorney for the plaintiffs declined to comment. Abbott's office, which is representing the state, also declined to comment.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2manytaxes; 2muchtax; 4thechildren; constitution; gimmegimmegimme; itisatax; stripclubs; tax; taxandspend; taxandspendliberals; taxtax; taxtaxtax; taxtaxtaxtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
"The clubs say the fee would amount to an unconstitutional tax on nude dancing, a form of expression protected by the First Amendment."
1 posted on 12/18/2007 3:20:22 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Still no cover in Fort Erie.


2 posted on 12/18/2007 3:22:44 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
How about a $5.00 fee to set foot on any one else's private property?
3 posted on 12/18/2007 3:23:48 PM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

I don’t like how government zeros in on certain businesses as tax opportunities like this. Why should this business be saddled with a tax to pay for the uninsured or sex abuse victims? I hope the clubs prevail.


4 posted on 12/18/2007 3:26:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here
How about a $5.00 fee to set foot on any one else's private property?

Wrong, you pay tax to the government for you to be on your there property.

5 posted on 12/18/2007 3:27:15 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here; Gabz; Eric Blair 2084; Madame Dufarge; metesky; mysterio

The bastard politicians never fail to come up with new ideas for robbery to pick citizen’s pockets.


6 posted on 12/18/2007 3:27:57 PM PST by The Ghost of Rudy McRomney ("I'm a proven leader. That's what the Des Moines Register said.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
It's expected to raise about $44 million to be dispersed for sexual assault prevention programs and health care for the uninsured

Right, and the money from the lottery is funding education ... and the money from the tobacco settlement is being used for health care < /sarcasm off

7 posted on 12/18/2007 3:28:17 PM PST by tx_eggman ("Believing without loving turns the best of creeds into a weapon of oppression" Eugene Peterson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Gotta love Texas, they’re right there on the cutting edge of a brave new world.


8 posted on 12/18/2007 3:28:38 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Robbing Peter to pay Paul. The kettle calling the pot black. Come on. Let’s get real here. That money will not be used to help anything but the greedy government.


9 posted on 12/18/2007 3:30:02 PM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
"The issue for us is an apples-to-apples issue," said state Rep. Ellen Cohen, D-Houston, author of the bill that created the fee. "This is an industry that largely employs women. It's an opportunity to do something for crimes that largely affect women."

How does "healthcare for the uninsured" become a "crime" that largely affects women?

What does "sexual assault prevention" program actually mean?

It's an industry that largely employs women. Most of them earn pretty good money - enough to buy their own heath insurance! By discouraging people from patronizing them with this unconstitutional tax, she aims to make them dependents of the government.

"This is an industry that largely employs women"
I love that quote. So she wants to punish an industry that largely employs women. To help the women of course! What a dum-dum.
10 posted on 12/18/2007 3:31:23 PM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

How about a $5.00 fee every time we get in our cars to offset medical fees from accidents?
Where does this end?
It doesn’t.
If they are allowed to get away with this there is no limit to what can be taxed for some so called “good cause”.


11 posted on 12/18/2007 3:32:05 PM PST by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Better to be known as a sex addict than a greedy politition addicted to money.

A politition is lower than a street hooker.


12 posted on 12/18/2007 3:32:06 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Are you kidding? We pay a tax to be n our own property.


13 posted on 12/18/2007 3:33:02 PM PST by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crz

Politicians are artists when it comes to inventing ways to scam you out of your money.


14 posted on 12/18/2007 3:33:57 PM PST by umgud (no more subprime politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Texas defends new $5-per-visitor strip club fee...

it must have taken a whole lot of boobs and asses must have come up with this tax!!!!


15 posted on 12/18/2007 3:34:20 PM PST by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
"It's expected to raise about $44 million to be dispersed for sexual assault prevention programs and health care for the uninsured."

That would include illegal immigrants, wouldn't it? And it would follow that they would frequent these establishments...so in a way, they're helping.

Make it $20.

16 posted on 12/18/2007 3:37:48 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Strange for a state that is so pro-gun, and rightly so, to put such a punitive tax on racks. Just doesn’t make sense.


17 posted on 12/18/2007 3:40:03 PM PST by Duke Nukum (He burns at the center of time and he sees the turn of the Universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

You know, if the government would just levy a $1000 tax for every time you masturbate, think of how many kitten lives would be saved!

Please government! Save the kittens!

Mark

18 posted on 12/18/2007 3:44:09 PM PST by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

“Gotta love Texas, they’re right there on the cutting edge of a brave new world.”

It seems states in the Southeast trend towards large and intrusive government even though they are “Red States.”

Unfortunately these kinds of fees and taxes are what RINOs running on “values” will give us. Kind of like Huckster.


19 posted on 12/18/2007 3:46:18 PM PST by Aglooka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nyyankeefan
it must have taken a whole lot of boobs and asses must have come up with this tax!!!!

I predict it will be a bust ... a real flop.

20 posted on 12/18/2007 3:46:45 PM PST by Zakeet (Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson