Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unindicted Duke LAX players sue Duke University
abc11 ^ | 12/18/2007 | Locomotive Breath

Posted on 12/18/2007 11:12:12 AM PST by Locomotive Breath

By Tamara Gibbs

DURHAM -- In a filing Tuesday in Federal Court, unindicted Duke Lacrosse players are suing Duke University, the City of Durham, Duke University professors, Mike Nifong and the DNA lab involved in the case.

The suit also names doctors and nurses who treated the alleged victim the night she claimed she'd been raped at a party. The players are also suing City Manager Patrick Baker and former Durham Police Chief Stephen Chalmers. As part of the investigation, the unindicted players had to give up DNA samples and were named in the school paper.

In the 404-page lawsuit, the players say that Duke University, the City of Durham and the other defendants were part of a "conspiracy to railroad 47 Duke University students" based on "the transparently false claim of rape, sexual offense, and kidnapping made by a clinically unreliable accuser." Also in the lawsuit, the players say that the accuser's claim was "taken virtually from her lips and fashioned into a weapon in the hands of those who would leverage outrage."

snip

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 88; dukelax; dukeu; durham; gangof88; lawsuit; libel; persecution; reputation; slander; suethebtrds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-355 next last
To: Tigercap
JESSICA BOA can you say "irony"?!
181 posted on 12/18/2007 6:13:13 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent

Rae Evans doesn’t see this as a hobby. She’s no soccer mom.
David Evans mother is a very accomplished woman. She is very wired into the Washington, D.C. scene and a very formidable opponent. Of anybody involved in this mess, she is the last one you would want to go up against.


182 posted on 12/18/2007 6:13:38 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
MICHAELINE CRICHLOW
183 posted on 12/18/2007 6:15:37 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
EDUARDO BONILLA-SILVA
184 posted on 12/18/2007 6:18:00 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I have no sympathy for their lawsuit.

That's right. Even though you didn't hire the strippers and were required to attending this spring break party you should be eternally punished.

185 posted on 12/18/2007 6:21:05 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
ROMAND COLES

perhaps my favorite. I can sooo see this guy signing some letter to be cool/hip despite any evidence. freak.

186 posted on 12/18/2007 6:21:10 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
LESBIE DAMASCENO
187 posted on 12/18/2007 6:23:04 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Bull_hit!

Not a one of them couldn’t have walked away. The only ones on the team with an excuse were the comatose.

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Cry me a river.


188 posted on 12/18/2007 6:26:14 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
LUBIANO WAHNEEMA
189 posted on 12/18/2007 6:28:02 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

HB-

I know, of course.

Please see post 61.


190 posted on 12/18/2007 6:36:19 PM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Actually a number of them walked away. You weren’t aware?

You should do some research before you condemn other sinners.

Fortunately Our Lord will.


191 posted on 12/18/2007 6:37:38 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Real bright — the ones who walked away have joined together with those who stayed???

And, I didn’t call them sinners. I called them braindead.

And I don’t believe that anyone can be required to come to a social event. If the Army can’t do it, then I know the lacrosse team can’t.


192 posted on 12/18/2007 6:42:11 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
That's not true. It's OK if a criminal prosecution results from the suit, but it's an ethical violation for the lawyers to use the threat of a criminal prosecution to coerce a defendant or potential defendant into settling or some other adverse action (unless the ethical rules have changed since I was in the biz).

You don't really think that no criminal prosecution could result if a non-suspect witness in a wrongful death suit blurted out that he himself was the killer, do you?

193 posted on 12/18/2007 6:43:34 PM PST by Hunton Peck (Fred: No games, no doubts, no crap taken or given. Exactly what America has been needing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

“Not sure I’m on board with this part. Depose as witnesses maybe, but sue? Not unless maybe they falsified evidence or something.”

Prosecutors ALWAYS over-charge...then the charges are generally reduced, as are the number of people sued in the first place. It always starts out as a “fishing expedition.”

It’s actually a pretty smart way to do things, though. Threaten to sue EVERYONE even remotely involved, see who caves first, see who becomes a Witness for the Defense along the way, see who will turn State’s Evidence and then litigate.

(I’m not a lawyer, but I’ve read nearly every crime novel ever written. Ask me anything, LOL!)


194 posted on 12/18/2007 6:44:18 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Do you consider hiring strippers to be the moral equivalency of law enforcement and University officials conspiring to falsely convict three innocent men of rape?


195 posted on 12/18/2007 6:46:37 PM PST by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Before you get so angry you should find out much more about this case.

A number of the young men walked away from the event. They have evidence, telephone and ATM records, that they were many miles away.

The issue here is criminal conduct on the part of Durham officials and now, apparently, on the part of Duke University and its Board of Trustees. Let’s not forget the conduct of the prostitute who had the DNA of NINE different men in her.

If you feel you have to cast stones why don’t you point them in another direction?


196 posted on 12/18/2007 6:49:33 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
My original post said: Actually, I have no sympathy for their lawsuit. (For their legal exhoneration, yes, but for this lawsuit, no.)
197 posted on 12/18/2007 6:53:37 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

I would tell my son:

“Don’t go if there’s a stripper/hooker. It’s not WISE.”

That’s not stone-throwing. That’s just good old fashioned common sense.

What would you tell your son (assuming, of course, that you have one? :>)


198 posted on 12/18/2007 6:56:25 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap

Good job!

This group of 88 should be hung!


199 posted on 12/18/2007 7:01:48 PM PST by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Hope the Fong is finding that out :)


200 posted on 12/18/2007 7:09:28 PM PST by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson