Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: 'When fascism comes it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross'. (Drudge's Title)
(YouTube Via Drudge) ^

Posted on 12/18/2007 7:41:42 AM PST by mnehring

YouTube video via Drudge- Ron Paul quote this morning on Fox and Friends- "When fascism comes it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. "


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911truther; americahaterpaul; antiamerican; antichristian; antisemitism; appeaser; asseenonstormfront; bigot; binladensboy; blimpy; campaignofhate; chucklehead; codepink; cornholecandidate; cuckoo; daviddukespresident; domesticenemy; endorsedbydu; fakeconservative; flagbashing; flamingspammonkey; gaysforpaul; georgenorryschoice; heeeeeeeeeeykoolaid; kook; kookcinichpaul2008; losertarian; molestersforpaul; moonbat; muslimsforpaul; neonazi; outlawjournalismcom; paul2008; paulahmadinejad2008; paulbearers; paulestinians; pimpsforpaul; potheadsforpaul; racist; ratsforpaul; religiousintolerance; rino; ronaldapplewhite; ronpaul; ronpaulcult; rupaul; shrimpfest2007; soros; stormfrontcandidate; strippersforpaul; surrendermonkey; tehranron; tehronpaul; thedailykoscandidate; tinfoilism; treasonisthereason; truther; wrongpaul; youknowhesnuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,021-1,039 next last
To: DakotaRed
And still, he sits at 4%

With 'likely' Republican voters. Those would be the same folks that voted in 2004 and 2006. Many conservatives (like myself) dropped out right before or after 2000 having given up on the entire mess.

721 posted on 12/18/2007 4:58:34 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Petition our congress to be admitted as a state of our union. If congress votes the petition down, well, at least the effort was made and future considerations should be based on the attempt.

LOL, Puerto Rico can't even be admitted to the union and they've tried several times. You honestly believe the majority of the citizens of the respective states would elect representation to admit a state into the union halfway around the world in a war zone?!?

You're either with us or against us.

On what? Limited government? Economic freedom?

722 posted on 12/18/2007 5:01:07 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

ROTFLMAO!!!!


723 posted on 12/18/2007 5:01:36 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
You got called on something and all you offer is insults.

No, I was pointing out that you claim to be posting facts, yet all they are are theories and hunches. That's not an insult, and pretending to be the victim is shameful.

I was just pointing out that the arguments of anti-Ron Paul types get nuttier and nuttier as you deconstruct them and push their proponents further back against the wall. Your sudden claim to see "insults" in everything, pretending to be the victim and trying to end the discussion by claiming the other side is "embarassing" itself proves me right.

Again, you are absolutely insistent that Ron Paul's money is coming from liberals, despite the lack of evidence to back that up. I point to actual evidence of where it's coming from, specifically tracking maps showing it's mostly red states, and ask you why you still claim it's from liberals. There's no "insult" there, just a request for an explanation.

724 posted on 12/18/2007 5:03:44 PM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Of course, none of this has anything to do with the truth that paleoPaulie is an antiAmerican antiwar peace creep who deserves to be politically destroyed.

I can buy the "none of this has anything do with the truth" part easily enough.

725 posted on 12/18/2007 5:04:23 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
They also seem to overlook the reality that the Founding Fathers who went on to become presidents did not seem to have a problem with entering into armed conflict without congressional approval.

Agreed. If congress feels the need to declare "war" or "the use of force" is needed and the President decides to exercise that option, their territory belongs to us when conquered.

Welcome to the union, via conquest or of their governments volition.

726 posted on 12/18/2007 5:05:35 PM PST by michigander (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration; tacticalogic
Remember I said that the New Deal was being sold to the American people as an alternative to Communism.

FDR had a Communist vice President, Wallace, so FDR was pretty unconcerned with them personally.

Actually, John Nance Garner was Vice President for FDR's first two terms. Henry Wallace was VP from 1941 to 1945, AFTER the New Deal was enacted.

Also most Neocons come from this ideological background as well.

According to the Paulistinians, that applies to any Republican but the Paulistinians.

727 posted on 12/18/2007 5:07:55 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
According to the Paulistinians, that applies to any Republican but the Paulistinians.

According to the antiPaulistinians, there's no such thing as a neo-con.

728 posted on 12/18/2007 5:10:19 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies]

To: billbears
On what? Limited government? Economic freedom?

Or they're on their own against the other forces that may be allied against them.

Do you feel that admitting new states to our union is such a terrible thing?

Would joining or republic be that awful?

729 posted on 12/18/2007 5:12:56 PM PST by michigander (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Or they're on their own against the other forces that may be allied against them. Do you feel that admitting new states to our union is such a terrible thing?

No you're free to do so. Good luck with that though. Don't think you're going to get a lot of people to agree with you once it's explained just exactly what that would mean.

730 posted on 12/18/2007 5:15:02 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Would joining or republic be that awful?

Would joining our republic be that awful?

Oh noooooooo! A typo!!!

731 posted on 12/18/2007 5:15:16 PM PST by michigander (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Don't think you're going to get a lot of people to agree with you once it's explained just exactly what that would mean.

Really? Perhaps you could explain "what that would mean" and why it would be so bad.

732 posted on 12/18/2007 5:18:16 PM PST by michigander (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
The New Deal was peddled as our salvation from the Great Depression.

And the architects of the New Deal admired Benito Mussolini and the prosperity his government-run economy seemed to offer...

...which brings us back to Paul's original point. When fascism comes it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross, because they know they are emotional icons that, when brought up, generate knee-jerk reactions that stamp out rational skepticism. Anyone questioning the person hiding creeping fascism behind a fluttering Flag and shining Cross will be vilified as a "treasonous" and "jihadist."

And one only needs to read the posts here to see how right that is. If a self-proclaimed "man of God" told most FReepers we need centralized economic planning to keep the gays and terrorists at bay, they'd reflexively leap on board without stopping to think.

733 posted on 12/18/2007 5:24:43 PM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

Whatever you say about Paul, he is anything but a fascist.


734 posted on 12/18/2007 5:25:48 PM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Perhaps you could explain "what that would mean" and why it would be so bad.

Well besides it being even more reminiscent of the British Empire (sun never sets eh?) then we already have, you've just added 5,000,000+ people to the tax base, to the Social Security system, etc. Then you're going to have to convince them to follow our form of government and our laws. LOL, that ought to be fun. Not to mention the fact territorial disputes, etc. Our Armed Forces would literally be stationed there year round in defense, you'd have at least two whole fleets in the Med region just for that alone. How do you think the Russians, Chinese, et. al. are going to feel about that?

I'm just scratching the surface here. It simply would never work no matter how you feel about it. Unless you've forgotten Republicans are supposed to stand for limited government and your one move would at least double (if not triple) the size of government and the bureaucracy we currently have

735 posted on 12/18/2007 5:26:16 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
A Communitarian Ethos

The Groton influence of Endicott Peabody showed in a speech Roosevelt gave at the People's Forum in Troy, NY in 1912. There he declared that western Europeans and Americans had achieved victory in the struggle for "the liberty of the individual," and that the new agenda should be a "struggle for the liberty of the community." The wrong ethos for a new age was, "every man does as he sees fit, even with a due regard to law and order." The new order should be, "march on with civilization in a way satisfactory to the well-being of the great majority of us."

In that speech Roosevelt outlined the philosophical base of what would eventually become the New Deal. He also forecast the rhetorical mode by which "community" could loom over individual liberty. "If we call the method regulation, people hold up their hands in horror and say ‘un-American,' or ‘dangerous,'" Roosevelt pointed out. "But if we call the same identical process co-operation, these same old fogeys will cry out ‘well done'.... cooperation is as good a word for the new theory as any other."

736 posted on 12/18/2007 5:28:00 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
"What will fascism be wrapped in if/when it comes?"

-----

A "Diversity in the Workplace" training manual.

Hank

737 posted on 12/18/2007 5:33:38 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Well, really just plain Hank Kimball. Well, not "just plain" Hank Kimball, just Hank Kimball....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Renounce them then take their cash.

But they're dumb enough to donate to someone who's believes in the exact opposite they do. If George Soros offered me a million bucks, Hell yeah I'm taking it!

You criticize my comprehension yet you paint in your own words a man who's in it for the money.

How can Paul be in it for the money? He refused his Congressional pension, for crying out loud. Dude c'mon now!

738 posted on 12/18/2007 5:34:46 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; Injun_Ear_Danny; Allegra; mvpel
Use the search (by poster) feature for “Allegra” ...

Welcome to FR IED. If you are looking for high quality, informative, and thoughtful posts, I suggest you rather search under user 'mvpel'. He has some outstanding posts on this thread alone.
739 posted on 12/18/2007 5:35:13 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
And still, he sits at 4%

You know those polls don't include his name, and they're polling the same deteriorating GOP base that voted in 2004, right?

740 posted on 12/18/2007 5:36:31 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,021-1,039 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson