Posted on 12/02/2007 5:31:29 AM PST by fweingart
The Bible is against abortion. Hillary is for killing womb babies.
The Bible is against active homosexuality. Hillary endorses sodomy.
The Bible is against other gods than God. Hillary is polytheistic in that any deity is fine for her.
Yet Hillary quotes then from the Bible in a sanctuary. So what’s new?
Per AP, “Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton used an appearance at one of the nation’s largest evangelical churches Thursday to sketch a broad agenda to take on disease around the globe, calling it ‘the right thing to do.’
“The centerpiece of a speech laced with Biblical references and reflections on her own faith was a call to spend billions of dollars to combat HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases at home and abroad. She said she would try to stamp out malaria deaths in Africa within eight years.”
Hillary sounds like Rudy Giuliani when it comes to using Jesus for her own political opportunism. No problem with that. It’s the biblical jargon that is quick to their tongues because they have honed that part of their hypocrisy.
Why did Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Church, Orange County, California, invite Hillary on to his agenda? These so-called evangelical leaders who hug Hillary and Barack Obama are traitors to the traditional biblical Christianity.
Hillary and Obama have plenty of secular venues; they don’t need a sanctuary, pulpit and congregation under the label “evangelical” to provide them with further shelter. Yet this compromising the faith goes on in some so-called evangelical circles. It is disgusting.
“Clinton was alone among leading candidates to fly to coastal California to appear at Saddleback Church in Orange County, where pastor and best-selling author Rick Warren convenes a conference each year to highlight the global threat posed by HIV/AIDS.”
The gist of this article is not against raising funds to combat a deadly disease. It is condoning politicos who grab hold of the Bible to support their personas while all the time breathing ethics that are anti-Scripture.
“Many Christian conservatives dread the possibility of another Clinton White House, a point of agreement in a year when prominent leaders in the movement have divided their loyalties among GOP contenders.
“There was a sprinkle of criticism from conservatives in response to Clinton’s appearance at the church, but it was muted compared to last year when more than a dozen conservative leaders signed a letter urging Warren to rescind an invitation to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., who supports abortion rights. The church defended his appearance.
“Warren is theologically and socially conservative, but he is known for avoiding the scrum of partisan politics. The author of ‘The Purpose-Driven Life’ has devoted much of his time in recent years mobilizing evangelicals to fight AIDS in Africa.
“The speech gave Clinton a chance to appear on stage with the popular pastor — who greeted her with a hug — as well as talk at length about her own faith.”
Hug her?
As far as I can reason Warren, he too is an outright opportunist. He is bloated over the sales of his book. Therefore, his egocentricity flies out for more more more. Yet he is exposing his use of Jesus and Bible for his own purse and rising conceit level.
Compromising the biblical lifestyle and moral base does not set well with God. It also does not go over with those totally surrendered to a separation from the worldly unto the holiness of God.
“’I’ve been raised to understand the power and purpose of prayer,’ she (Hillary) said at one point.”
Hillary once again lies.
Her prayers don’t go any further than her mouth for her heart is not in the right place. Jesus does not reside in a heart that endorses slaying the unborn and campaigning for the same-gender practices that go on in the practicing homosexual playtime.
How many Christians are aware that Satan is allow to make this offer even to them? And how many Christians are aware that it will be allowed to be offered to those who are still in these flesh bodies at that appointed time? Ever wonder why it will be as a thief in the night when the perfect Christ returns? Most everyone will not even be looking for the perfect Christ as they will be deceived by the impostor.
You aren’t high enough in the organization or haven’t done your homework on it, but not to worry, because those who devote themselves to masonry ultimately are associated with those who are good for nothingness.
Prove it.
I'm not saying that I am for abortion or that Hillary is against it, but I am saying that one likely will not be able to prove at least 1 of those assertions.
Actually, if Muhammad did not know if he was speaking to an angel or devil, I’ll bet it was the devil. Just look at all the “peaceful” stuff in Islam. barf
Her quoting the Bible make as much sense as puttig a dress on a pig.
And where, pray tell, did you gather your wealth of information on the subject?
Becuase they both share the same agenda.
Those who will twist scripture to their own purposes will twist anything, and are quite literally devilish.
Exactly why I have never been able to stand either one of them, starting for me, with that 60 Minutes interview where Slick Willy (who has yet to decide on a hair color) and his phony little Cookie-Baking Missus first ran a '2-for-1' campaign for President, sweetly holding hands and lying straight into the camera. Their phoniness is palpable.
...now 'scuze me while I go spit..
I tend to believe that similar to spotting a counterfeit 20 dollar bill, one only needs to be intimately acquainted with The Original, and the fakes make themselves stand out.
The Sixth Commandment
She’s not bad looking when compared to Hillary.
From masons themselves.
So am I. How many million did Bush recently commit to? $50,000,000.00 was it?
Just us poor dumb taxpayer's money. He thinks nothing of throwing it around!
Exodus 21....
I am not an advocate for abortion, but when I read that passage, I see that it is not about murder.
Murder is dealt with much more harshly.
To be honest, I am more into the debate than I am in the defense of even the position that I would (to small minds) appear to hold.
Let them defend their words out here.
Not only that, it's against the Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules.
Sounds more like the modern equivilent of “manslaughter” to me.
“Actually, if Muhammad did not know if he was speaking to an angel or devil, I’ll bet it was the devil. “
Actually, Muhammad was speaking to a meteorite, which is why it was hard for him to tell.
See.... There was a LIGHT in the SKY and the WISE MEN followed it until it led them to the Son of God, in a manger, who they then worshipped.
Others who were not as wise, followed the light until it came crashing down into a field. They picked up the smoking, hot rock that was left, and placed it in a manger, and worshipped it.
RE: #19: agreed. Why tamp more of our inflated dollars down a rat hole?
22 "If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
If a woman gives birth prematurely, and the baby dies, then the assailant is to be given the death penalty. This point is HUGE!!! What God is saying here is that the value and worth of an adult man is equal to the value and worth of an unborn fetus who was young enough, or injured enough, to die.
God equates the loss of an unborn baby as the loss of a life, for He says, "you are to take life for life,..." This point cannot be emphasized too strongly. God considers the unborn baby alive, and the loss of that life is considered murder. This murder is punishable with the death penalty. This verse demonstrates three truths:
a) The unborn's life is equivalent in value to an adult's life in God's sight
b) This also outlines God's Law against criminal feticide.
c) The killing of the unborn is murder
Warren has never had a correct ecclesiology and it has eventually led to his theological liberalism because he refuses correction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.