Posted on 11/26/2007 11:58:02 AM PST by Daus
Two years ago, way under. Last year, way over. This year, still not right.
It's been a stormy few years for William Gray, Philip Klotzbach and other scientists who predict total hurricane activity before each season begins, which raises fundamental questions as the 2007 season draws to an end on Friday:
Why do they bother? And given the errors -- which can undermine faith in the entire hurricane warning system -- are these full-season forecasts doing more harm than good?
''The seasonal hurricane forecasters certainly have a lot of explaining to do,'' said Max Mayfield, former director of the National Hurricane Center.
''The last couple of years have humbled the seasonal hurricane forecasters and pointed out that we have a lot more to learn before we can do accurate seasonal forecasts,'' he said.
The numbers provide abundant support for those statements.
Just before the season started on June 1, the nationally prominent Gray-Klotzbach team at Colorado State University predicted that 17 named storms would grow into nine hurricanes, five of which would be particularly intense, with winds above 110 mph.
A different team at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted 13 to 17 named storms, seven to 10 hurricanes and three to five intense hurricanes.
The actual results for the 2007 season: 14 named storms, five hurricanes, two intense hurricanes.
That turned a season predicted to be extremely active into one that was about average in number of storms and well below average in total intensity.
Even mid-season corrections issued by both teams in August -- somewhat akin to changing your prediction about a baseball game during the fifth inning -- proved wrong.
Their pre-season predictions in 2005 and 2006 were even worse.
The teams defend their forecasts, saying they are based on the best science available, were closer to the mark in prior years and serve an important public service.
''The seasonal forecasts are quite good,'' said Gerry Bell, NOAA's lead seasonal forecaster. ``Last year, we over-predicted and this year we over-predicted, but our track record, I think, is excellent.''
Klotzbach, who now is the lead forecaster of the Colorado State team created more than two decades ago, said long-range predictions satisfy the public's ``inherent curiosity.''
Both teams employ what they call ''climate signals'' -- a variety of ocean and atmospheric conditions -- along with historical records to produce their forecasts.
''Seasonal forecasts are meant to provide people with the best information possible about how active or inactive the coming season is likely to be,'' Klotzbach said.
Mayfield and virtually all hurricane researchers and forecasters, some of whom were skeptical years ago, now support the issuing of full-season predictions.
But many openly share concerns about the current system, focusing in particular on NOAA's tendency to subtly link the National Hurricane Center in West Miami-Dade County to the seasonal forecasts produced by Bell's team, which is based in Maryland.
In fact, it is important to emphasize the distinction between the six-month seasonal forecasts and the real-time forecasts of an actual hurricane or other tropical system, which are called ``operational forecasts.''
Several researchers at the hurricane center worked with Gray and contribute to the data collected by Bell's team, but the center's real-time forecasters play no substantive role in the full-season predictions and are not responsible for them.
CONCERN OVER IMPACT
Many of them worry, however, that substantial errors in those full-season predictions can undermine faith in their generally accurate forecasts of actual storms.
They note that NOAA, parent agency of the hurricane center and Bell's team, often releases Bell's predictions during pre-season news conferences conducted at the hurricane center.
During other years, the hurricane center's director is ordered to participate in the pre-season news conference, wherever it might be held.
''NOAA has been using the good name of the National Hurricane Center, at least to some extent, to help promote the seasonal product and that's not the mission of operational hurricane forecasters,'' Mayfield said.
''In some areas, hurricane forecasters are losing credibility even though they are not the lead on this -- and that's always a concern,'' he said. ``We don't want the credit for the seasonal forecasts.''
Bell said the differences between the two groups should be clear to the public by now. He said South Floridians and other residents of the hurricane zone should never disregard real-time forecasts, especially based on a misconception about the full-season predictions.
''There's no basis for those kinds of comments,'' Bell said, ``especially if they're made by people who don't know what they're talking about.''
Another concern focuses on the hyperactivity of the Gray-Klotzbach team, which issues not one, not two, but six forecasts before and during the season.
The first arrives in early December, forecasting the outcome of a hurricane season that doesn't begin for six months. Maintaining the baseball comparison, that would be like predicting -- this past October -- the Marlins' precise win-loss record in 2008.
''If Gray were honest, he would say they have no skill in making predictions that far in advance,'' said Jeff Masters, a former NOAA hurricane researcher who now serves as chief meteorologist of the Weather Underground. ``It's just an interesting mental exercise.''
Nevertheless, Masters also favors the issuing of seasonal forecasts.
''If you put good science in the hands of people, that's always a benefit,'' he said.
''But they should do a better job of educating the public about the uncertainty involved,'' Masters added. ``And they have to keep underscoring that you have to be prepared in any given year, whatever the forecast.''
That raises another issue.
Virtually everyone involved in the system agrees that seasonal forecasts provide opportunities to remind the public that it must prepare for the worst -- and that certainly works during the current period of generally heightened hurricane activity.
But what happens the next time the data suggest a comparatively mild season? How will the scientists handle that and might that information encourage people to let down their guard?
WHEREVER IT LEADS
The leaders of both teams say they are scientists and will go where the science takes them, regardless of where that might be.
''We believe, and I'm sure NOAA would agree, that people should not relax or pay less attention if we forecast an inactive season,'' Klotzbach said. ``Obviously, storms can make landfall and do major damage in inactive years. Just look at Hurricane Andrew in 1992 as an example of this.''
NOAA does agree.
''People have the right to know if we think it will be an above normal or below normal season,'' Bell said.
''But we always, always, impress on people that we cannot, on seasonal time scales, predict if a given locality is going to get hit, so they have to be ready,'' he said.
And what about the recent tendency to over-predict seasonal activity?
''Forecast activity was too high,'' Bell said. ``But gosh darn it, that's a good thing. We'll take it.''
''Forecast activity was too high,'' Bell said. ``But gosh darn it, that's a good thing. We'll take it.''
Gosh darn it Bell! You are a moron! :)
Prediction is not a science.
It reads better this way....
Time to call on Al Gore and his band of lemmings to predict the weather for next week. Al is the best on long-term predictions and needs to focus his scope to just 6 months out.
So what does this say about the whole faux science of global warming? If these “scientists,” with “the best science available,” can’t accurately predict a year in advance (or even mid-way through the season), how do they expect us to believe what they try to predict for 50 to 100 years from now?
The price of oil still went up without the storms.
It’s Bush’s fault!
global warming, Bush’s fault, yada yada...
Just a reminder before people go on to trash William Gray, the guy is a Global Warming SKEPTIC, like most of us here on FR... one of the good guys, in that respect.
They’re tied into the glowarmers mantra...the world-wide scam taking place. IF IF IF we can predict dire hurricanes and put fear into the people maybe they’ll all step up to the plate for this obvious scam.
‘Why do they bother?’
Because we have a 24/7/365 news cycle, and airtime must be filled.....
Ask Grey, he'll give you a straight answer. He'll tell you they can't and GW is a crock. Look him up. He doesn't pull any punched.
Maybe they should demand a recount?
I’m just sayin’,....?!?!?
When the first cold front hit Florida in September the season was over ... By the time the second cold front hit Florida in September — The forecasters should have called it then and saved a little face.
Bingo.
Every year, some man made enviromental disaster will kill us all.
Every year, some lethal virus will kill us all
Every year, some favorite food will cause cancer and kill us all.
We're all going to die - news at 11.
Will do. Thanks.
Gives cover to the oil traders to trade oil up based on predictions. Am I the only one that is think when the house of cards falls, it will fall hard?
True....Wm Gray is a definite skeptic of man-made Global Warming...he is no Goreist
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.