Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philadelphia Sets Deadline for Boy Scouts to Renounce Anti-Gay Policy
Christian Post ^ | 11/23/07 | Lawrence Jones

Posted on 11/23/2007 2:51:44 PM PST by wagglebee

The city of Philadelphia is threatening to end a nearly 80-year building agreement with the nation’s third Boy Scouts chapter if the group doesn’t change its policy to accommodate gay employees.

All members of the local Scouts chapter, which operates as the Cradle of Liberty Council, must take the Scout Oath and Law in which they promise to do their duty to God and to be morally straight, as well as to be clean in their thoughts, words and deeds.

While the organization does not inquire about sexual orientation at the time of membership, the group bars an avowed homosexual from leadership because they believe such an individual would not be a role model for the values espoused in the Oath and Law, according to a past news release from Boy Scouts of America.

A 2000 Supreme Court ruling upheld the right of the national Boy Scouts to exclude openly gay members from its ranks since it was a private organization.

However, Philadelphia City Solicitor Romulo Diaz said the group’s currently policy amounts to discrimination and has set a Dec. 3 deadline for the Boy Scouts to either renounce their moral standards or lose the headquarters they have rented from the city for $1 a year since 1928, reported the Washington Post.

According to Diaz, the Boy Scouts’ policy conflicts with a local 1982 “fair practice” law which prohibits employers from conditioning employment on the basis of “sexual orientation.”

"While we respect the right of the Boy Scouts to prohibit participation in its activities by homosexuals, we will not subsidize that discrimination by passing on the costs to the people of Philadelphia," the Post reported Diaz as saying.

City officials have suggested that the Scouts can stay at the Beaux-Arts building if they agree to pay the building’s market value price which is tentatively set at $200,000 a year.

If the Scouts refuse the ultimatum, Diaz said he will begin looking for alternative tenants to take over the property June 1, 2008.

While the offer may seem fair, Robert Knight of the Media Research Center wrote in a column posted on TownHall.com Tuesday that the Post report left out many key facts to the dispute.

The Beaux-Arts building was in fact built by the Scouts and later given to the city in 1928, noted Knight.

He added that the Scouts had a lease “in perpetuity” with the city, an agreement that was not upheld by the City Council.

Knight also suggested that that the city stands to benefit greatly from the youth organization, noting that most of the crimes dealing with murder and violence are committed by fatherless young men.

In an interview on “Hannity & Colmes” Tuesday, Jeff Jubelirer, spokesman for Boy Scouts of America, said the group had already modified its policy with a non-discrimination statement issued by city officials.

The non-discrimination statement reads: "Prejudice, intolerance and unlawful discrimination in any form are unacceptable within the ranks of Cradle of Liberty Council.”

According to Jubelirer, the group was assured “that if you adopt this, we'll be fine, and nothing has happened since that time.”

The local chapter has also in the past tried to renounce an affiliation with the national policy in hopes of saving its headquarters but has met difficulties.

“We were trying to be amendable to all sides, but National would not allow us to keep that language, so we rescinded it,” said Jubelirer in the Post report. “We can’t have a policy where we put in specific words that National won’t allow or we’ll loose our charter. We can’t afford not to be part of the national Boy Scouts.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; bsa; cradleofliberty; gaystapo; homofascism; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; philadelphia; romulodiaz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Pinkbell

Sadly, metro Philadelphia has been a high crime zone for decades. It seems like a responsible city council would encourage institutions like the Boy Scouts. In recent years, however, city government has been promoting Philly as a gay tourist destination:

http://www.gophila.com/C/Your_Philadelphia/14/Gay_friendly_Philadelphia/4.html


21 posted on 11/23/2007 3:29:30 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A “lease in perpetuity” should clear up the matter.


22 posted on 11/23/2007 3:31:23 PM PST by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Should read:

“Philadelphia upset that homosexual predators are denied access to young boys.”


23 posted on 11/23/2007 3:31:30 PM PST by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Instead of having presidential candidates making empty threats about withholding funds from “sanctuary” cities, we should be having conservative congressmen throwing monkey wrenches into pork for the cities who are picking on the boy scouts.


24 posted on 11/23/2007 3:33:49 PM PST by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Philadelphia has a serious crime problem and they can’t stop that. Gees.


25 posted on 11/23/2007 3:37:45 PM PST by Ptarmigan (Bunnies=Sodomites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

From what I have read, Philadelphia City Solicitor Romulo Diaz is himself a sodomite. ....Which helps explain why Philadelphia is so intent on forcing the Boy Scouts to let homosexual scout leaders take little boys off into the woods.

Anyway, I cannot for the life of me figure out why an organization with the integrity and traditional American values of the Boy Scouts would want to be anywhere within a hundred miles of a sick toilet like Philadelphia.


26 posted on 11/23/2007 3:39:01 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The Boy Scouts is supposed to be a good influence of young men — why would Philadelphia expect the Boy Scouts to open his doors to admitted perverts?


27 posted on 11/23/2007 3:40:37 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore

Exactly: their either is a lease or there isn’t. The City Council certainly doesn’t have the power to choose whether or not to “uphold” a valid lease.


28 posted on 11/23/2007 3:43:28 PM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kromike

I think only those with English as a second language confuse lose and loose.


29 posted on 11/23/2007 3:44:01 PM PST by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Why don’t the queers just give up and start their own scouts!!!

The same reason vegetarians would rather picket KFC, BK, et. al. than open their own restaurant(s).

30 posted on 11/23/2007 3:46:57 PM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Wouldn't’t the Boy Scouts have a case for Eminent Domain since they have used the facility in question for decades?
31 posted on 11/23/2007 3:47:38 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is disgusting!!!!!


32 posted on 11/23/2007 3:59:17 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeebee
I think only those with English as a second language confuse lose and loose.

Well, they did want to let them "loose" from the contract.

33 posted on 11/23/2007 3:59:28 PM PST by umgud (the profound is only so to those that it is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Boy Scouts should tell the city that they can take their building and shove it! No surrender!!


34 posted on 11/23/2007 4:01:04 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“The Beaux-Arts building was in fact built by the Scouts and later given to the city in 1928, noted Knight. He added that the Scouts had a lease “in perpetuity” with the city, an agreement that was not upheld by the City Council.”

The scouts should go to court and take the building back... Since the city did not live up to the terms of the gift.


35 posted on 11/23/2007 4:03:41 PM PST by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Anyone in Philly own any available space for rent?


36 posted on 11/23/2007 4:05:52 PM PST by infidel29 (Voting for Paul? Might as well make it Ru Paul, he's got better legs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
According to Diaz, the Boy Scouts’ policy conflicts with a local 1982 “fair practice” law which prohibits employers from conditioning employment on the basis of “sexual orientation.”

Easily fixed. Re-classify all Scoutmasters and Troop Leaders as "Volunteers" not employees.

37 posted on 11/23/2007 4:08:01 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Jet noise. The Sound of Freedom. - Go Air Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
This world has gone mad when the Leftist/faggotry contingent expect a private organization to renounce their morality, yet expect them to 'celebrate' the oppressors' lack thereof. They are nothing more than an ass-backwards Taliban with STD's.

Don't cave, BSA. Let the Supremes and DOJ have their day. I have seen the future of America. And only one side can win.


38 posted on 11/23/2007 4:12:04 PM PST by Viking2002 (Waterboarding the Left every chance I get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"We were trying to be amendable to all sides, but National would not allow us to keep that language, so we rescinded it,” said Jubelirer in the Post report. “We can’t have a policy where we put in specific words that National won’t allow or we’ll loose our charter. We can’t afford not to be part of the national Boy Scouts.”

I checked the link and this is verbatim; when did Norm Crosby become the head proofreader for these malaprops?

Amenable and lose are clearly called for above and only someone who is loose with the language would think otherwise

39 posted on 11/23/2007 4:20:46 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; OAKC0N; time4good; Mike32; genxer; PatriotEdition; Simul iustus et peccator; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

40 posted on 11/23/2007 4:22:44 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson