Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

YouTube Video Shows Man Tasered After Refusing to Sign Ticket
Fox News ^ | November 21, 2007 | Sara Bonisteel

Posted on 11/21/2007 11:58:07 AM PST by Sopater

An internal police investigation is under way after a formal complaint was filed against a Utah state trooper who was videotaped Tasering a man who refused to sign a speeding ticket.

The officer's conduct has been called into question after a videotape of the incident was posted on YouTube.

The video, taken from a Utah Highway Patrol dashboard camera, shows Trooper John Gardner using a Taser on Jared Massey during a traffic stop on State Road 40 in Uintah County on Sept. 14.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; leo; revenuetickets; taser; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680681-689 next last
To: joseph20

Apparently a few of these guys posting think that a cop can do whatever the hell he wants just because he wears a badge.

If someone watches this video and does not find the cop at fault, then that person is clearly biased in their opinion of the role of law enforcement.

An unbiased jury would obviously find this cop at fault.


661 posted on 11/23/2007 7:16:52 PM PST by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

No, this exchange did not take place.


662 posted on 11/23/2007 7:42:49 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Ken, here are the actual events as they took place:

Massey: No, I’m not. I’m not signing anything.

Gardner: Okay, hop out of the car.

Gardner then turns his back to the driver and walks back to set his clipboard down on the bumper of his car. As he’s doing this, Massey gets out of the car and approaches the police cruiser. As he does, he is pointing down in the direction he just came from. He is saying something unintelligible, but most likely about the speed limit sign. The officer acts as if he’s surprised to see the guy out of his vehicle, even though he just told him to ‘hop out of the car’.

Gardner: Turn around, put your hands behind your back. (by the time he gets to the word “hands” THE VERY FIRST TIME he’s already got his own hand on his taser and is pulling it from its holster)

Massey: ...continues to say something about the speed limit sign...

Gardner: Turn around, put your hands behind your back. NOW.

Massey: What the hell is wrong with you

At this point Massey TURNS AROUND and begins walking slowly toward his vehicle. It is clear from watching the tape that he had no idea why this cop was pulling a gun on him, and if you watch the CNN interview you’ll see that he does say he thought it was a real gun. He had a natural reaction which was to turn his back to the danger and attempt to distance himself from it.

Gardner: Turn around. Turn around. (Again, it’s not clear what the officer is asking him to do. Massey has already TURNED AROUND and is facing in the opposite direction from where he was the first time this directive was issued.)

Massey: What the heck’s wrong with you?

At this point, Gardner fires the taser.

That’s everything up to the point of the taser. Despite what some are saying about editing of the video, none of this portion of the video is edited.


663 posted on 11/23/2007 8:18:59 PM PST by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

No such dialogue took place.


664 posted on 11/23/2007 8:20:01 PM PST by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
Thanks for the report!

I thought it was downright dangerous to tase the guy on the side of a busy highway. He could easily have fallen or lurched into oncoming traffic. The trooper did not look back to see if there was traffic coming from the time the guy started to walk away until he fired.

Very reckless, IMO.

665 posted on 11/23/2007 8:43:40 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: Harvey105

Not even close.


666 posted on 11/23/2007 9:23:10 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
I thought the officer represented particularly well, the law enforcement community, when he said,..."....hurts...doesn't it", with a modicum of glee in his voice.

What a putz.

667 posted on 11/24/2007 8:23:26 AM PST by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway
Asking again for you to respond to #653, which disputes what you have stated to be facts.

Are you standing by your claims?

668 posted on 11/24/2007 10:15:44 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: Ken H; cowboyway

Ken, you might as well stick a fork in him. Whether he responds or not, his credibility is toast.


669 posted on 11/24/2007 12:02:48 PM PST by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter; Sue Perkick; rawhide
We have another audio dispute, so we need to consult our esteemed panel of sound experts! The following refers to the time when the driver was still in the vehicle:

Poster A says:

Listen to the tape very carefully, and you can hear the driver say "No, you're not".

Poster B says:

Ok... I've listened 3 more times... with my Bose sound-cancelling head phones... I just DON'T hear that. I do hear the driver saying, "No, I'm not".... I think, to whether or not he will sign the ticket.

Who is right?

670 posted on 11/24/2007 9:40:20 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Here's the link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1929301/posts?page=411#411

671 posted on 11/24/2007 9:49:58 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
I see that you already answered that in #663!

Massey: No, I'm not. I'm not signing anything.

672 posted on 11/24/2007 10:17:06 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick
We’re not “cop haters”.

Yes you are.

673 posted on 11/24/2007 11:41:11 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

LOL


674 posted on 11/25/2007 6:11:53 AM PST by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
He's saying that he will not sign the ticket. He doesn't believe he was speeding. The cop doesn't make it clear from the beginning exactly what the speed is that the guy was clocked going.

This cop handled the situation poorly from the time he approached the driver. He took it to a place it never needed to go.

675 posted on 11/25/2007 6:37:17 AM PST by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free
If I had tased, clubbed, or maced every mouthy violator I pulled over during thirty years as a cop I would have spent a considerable amount of my time booking traffic violators, and writing reports explaining my use of force.

<SNIP> 

He was a blowhard, fool. It isn’t too hard to be smarter than a blowhard fool. If it is, then the trooper is in the wrong profession. He needs to get a different job.

 Applause.   I can tell you were a cop for the right reasons.   You should be on the jury when this jerk off cop gets his pants sued off.

 


 

676 posted on 11/25/2007 6:45:38 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

There is no such thing as a “Miranda stop”. “Miranda” was the name of a fellow arrested in the early sixties. Following the normal practice of the times, he was questioned without being advised that he could remain silent, have an attorney, etc. SCOTUS made a new rule that required police to advise folks of several of their Constitutional rights under certain circumstances.

You can “demand” to be taken to a magistrate all day long. After booking, if you aren’t PR’d you will see the magistrate when the arraignment hearings are scheduled. It may be different in your state.


677 posted on 11/26/2007 6:01:02 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

You are wrong even the new USSC ruling means you do not have to incriminate your self.


678 posted on 11/26/2007 6:05:24 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Illegal Immigration, a Clear and Present Danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Ok. Whatever you say.


679 posted on 11/26/2007 6:07:52 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Cops love tasers - they are a cool toy with which to inflict pain on those that don't obey their "commands". Talk about a power trip...

..And they wonder why people call them "pigs".

680 posted on 11/26/2007 6:21:22 AM PST by meyer (Illegal Immigration - The profits are privatized, the costs are socialized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680681-689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson