Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic Poll leaves our candidates
Free Republic ^ | 11/6/7 | Free Republic

Posted on 11/12/2007 2:49:24 PM PST by nsmart

(11/6) Which one of the following candidates should pro-life conservatives rally behind to defeat the liberal abortionists Hillary and Giuliani?

(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: editorialprerogative; liesthroughomission; mediabias; paulestinians; poll; thinningtheherd; vanity; wambulance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 next last
To: nsmart; All

BECAUSE IT SAID REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE!!!!!


181 posted on 11/12/2007 7:59:19 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Roger Dat,,,OT : Image and video hosting by TinyPic Our "Jedi" Ain't Been Home A Week And Already Bought A House...;0)
182 posted on 11/12/2007 8:01:14 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Ahhhh. Thanks.

Wish they’d make the polls likable otherwise. Such a hassle resetting it before and after voting in such a poll, I usually just don’t bother.


183 posted on 11/12/2007 8:01:44 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Hornitos
Did you really want the answer or were you being rhetorical?

65% - 2006
Two issues were considered for NARAL's rating. One was HR 1222, which would have allowed women in the military to get abortions. Paul voted against it, getting him a 0.

The other was S.403, the Child Interstate Abortion Notificatin Act. Paul voted against that, giving him the 65% rating (it's weighted by NARAL)...

…voted against the “Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act”

Paul said... ” Nevertheless, rather than abide by our constitutional limits, Congress today will likely pass S. 403. S. 403 amends title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines to avoid laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. Should parents be involved in decisions regarding the health of their children? Absolutely. Should the law respect parents’ rights to not have their children taken across State lines for contemptible purposes? Absolutely. Can a State pass an enforceable statute to prohibit taking minors across State lines to avoid laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions? Absolutely. But when asked if there exists constitutional authority for the Federal criminalizing of just such an action the answer is absolutely not.”

Here's NARAL's opinion of Ron Paul, FYI...

Voting Record: Rep. Paul has an anti-choice record.
184 posted on 11/12/2007 8:04:50 PM PST by jonathanmo (So many phobes, so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Yawn...

Are we still discussing what’s his name, the anti war wacko...

185 posted on 11/12/2007 8:06:26 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Voting to increase or decrease waiting periods means you agree the feds have a right to give ANY WAITING period. The supremes are taking up the 2nd Amendment soon — Here’s hoping they toss out all these unconstitutional laws. And then groups like the NRA will be floored.. no more need for them.


186 posted on 11/12/2007 8:13:41 PM PST by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Ron Paul does support the troops.


187 posted on 11/12/2007 8:15:20 PM PST by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: nsmart

Ron Paul is not a serious candidate. I know the Ron Paul supporters do not like to hear that, and I am sure that they will deny the reality that Ron Paul is not a viable candidate. The reality is that Ron Paul has to receive enough votes to win an election. This he cannot do.


188 posted on 11/12/2007 8:19:46 PM PST by Ferox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hornitos

I’m not sure about the reason. He is an OB/GYN saying he can be sued for harming a fetus. People can get convicted in court if a fetus is injured in a crime, too. He does not believe in abortion.

Could it be because he thinks Roe V Wade needs to be overturned and that tosses the issue to the States? He is a big States’ Rights person.


189 posted on 11/12/2007 8:20:40 PM PST by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: jonathanmo
How contemptible: “I voted against criminalizing the taking of minors across state lines without the parents’ consent or knowledge in order to commit murder because I, Justice Paul, decreed it would be unconstitutional.” He is a moral-coward, pure and simple.
190 posted on 11/12/2007 8:26:00 PM PST by Hornitos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: nsmart
The Swiss are conservative. Ron Paul would be just like that. They keep a gun behind every door. Ron Paul would be just like that. They trade with everyone but don’t join entangling alliances. Ron Paul would be just like that — defending the bill of rights and the constitution.

Enough with the Switzerland comparisons. Wake up and join us here in the 21st Century, where we know that the only reason the Nazis didn't overrun the Swiss is because there were secret deals beneath the "neutrality." But nowadays, when you are the world's center of no-questions asked hidden wealth and/or money-laundering, you don't need military entanglements to protect you.

It's amazing to me that you think making the United States more like Switzerland is an improvement.

191 posted on 11/12/2007 8:26:42 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (From Slick Willie to Slick Hill'y in Eight Years?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nsmart
Supposedly he would have voted against the abolition of slavery, too, since "there's no controlling legal authority."
192 posted on 11/12/2007 8:28:39 PM PST by Hornitos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Hornitos

That’s the Federalist position, so it’s not unexpected I wouldn’t think. Paul seems to be fairly consistent in his positions from that viewpoint. I believe he was also against the federal ban against partial-birth abortion, for the same reasons.


193 posted on 11/12/2007 8:30:16 PM PST by jonathanmo (So many phobes, so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: nsmart; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Allegra
Ron Paul does support the troops.

How?

194 posted on 11/12/2007 8:30:32 PM PST by mnehring (I am free not to support Ron Paul... Wow, I feel special...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: jonathanmo
And he would have voted against the abolition of slavery if it were ever put to a vote. Looney guy; small following.
195 posted on 11/12/2007 8:34:07 PM PST by Hornitos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
ronpaul amended the Constitution again?

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAA!

196 posted on 11/12/2007 8:38:49 PM PST by StarCMC (http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2007/08/11/school-of-the-counterpropagandist/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Lazarus Longer
"And Troops on the border is unconstitutional."

Did you get that piece of misinfo from RP himself, or did you take it straight out of your posterior?

I have kept reading to see if he ever said why he believes that to be true -- I've never heard that particular brand of insanity before.

197 posted on 11/12/2007 8:45:08 PM PST by StarCMC (http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2007/08/11/school-of-the-counterpropagandist/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Vet of Foreign Wars endorsed him. He got more donations from military than any other candidate last quarter.

http://www.militaryforpaul.com/article.html
Congressman Ron Paul is known as “the taxpayers’ best friend,” but he may also be the best friend local veterans have. Paul met with a group of veterans Saturday for lunch and then toured the Veterans’ Memorial in Mont Belvieu.

A veteran himself, Paul served as a flight surgeon from 1963 to 1968 in the U.S. Air Force and Air National Guard. Only about 5 percent of congressmen today are veterans, he said.

“The U.S. government tends to ignore veterans,” he said. “They’re anxious to get us in the military, but they forget about us when we come back.”

Paul said protecting veterans’ rights to medical benefits is a major priority for his office.

“That’s something we haven’t done a good enough job on,” he said. “As a doctor and a Congressman, that puts me in a position where I can help people who have been denied benefits. My goal is to try to save money in places where I think we spend too much so we can spend it there.”

This year, Paul helped to pass the Veterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2006 in Congress. The act is designed to help military veterans cope with the rising cost of living by tying increases in benefits to inflation.

The bill increases rates for veterans’ disability compensation and dependent compensation as well as dependency and indemnity compensation for surviving spouses and children of veterans.

For Vietnam-era veteran Warren Fitts, Paul’s experience as a serviceman gives him an edge over other politicians. Fitts served in Korea from 1972 to 1978 and is now vice president of the Baytown chapter of the Vietnam Veterans of America.

“He’s been a very good supporter of veterans past and present,” he said. “I like his views. He does research on current events overseas, the war on terror, the economy and keeping jobs stateside. He makes policies that are better for our country.”

On behalf of veterans past and present, Fitts presented Paul with a letter of appreciation and an eagle sculpture.

Fitts’ 20-year-old son, Stephen, is following the footsteps of his father, Paul and other veterans. He is serving in the Air Force and is stationed in Little Rock, Ark. Future veterans like him will also likely need political support, Paul said.

“I’m sure that even in the current war, they’re going to come back and need to get help in getting benefits,” he said.

In 2005, Paul introduced legislation designed to postpone military base closures in the United States. Domestic bases, he said, should not be shut down because they provide critical support for troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A condition of the legislation was that military cuts could not occur until after troops in Iraq returned to the United States.

Awarding long-deserved medals and commendations to veterans is also important for Paul and his staff. Last week, he said, he presented commendations to 19 veterans in Victoria.

“A lot of veterans are never awarded their medals,” he said. “They were just worried about getting home, but later on, they may wonder if they were awarded with anything.”

Through a veterans’ coordinator in his office, Paul can assist veterans in determining which commendations they are set to receive.

“It’s more emotional than you’d ever believe,” he said. “When we finally get to award them their medals, they’re filled with such pride and emotion. A lot of them end up in tears because they just didn’t realize what they’d earned because they wanted to get it all behind them.”

Paul and his office are working with World War II veteran Harry Daves to retrieve an overdue commendation. Daves has already received a Silver Star, Purple Heart and Navy Combat Ribbon for his service in Africa, but he has never been awarded a Navy Cross, the second highest medal a naval officer can receive.

Daves, now a resident of Old River, said he earned the commendation by leading a risky mission on the beach.

“They’re trying to get it for me,” he said. “I was on that beach barefooted, and after pulling people out of the water, I swam in the ocean and got back in the ship. There were 40-foot waves and 40 mph winds.”

After sharing war stories with Daves and other veterans, Paul visited the Veterans’ Memorial in Mont Belvieu and headed to Beach City for a reception in his honor.

...

You can read the rest. He is a patriot. I know you are invested in the idea of battling in Iraq, but it was done on false circumstances. Its a lot more danger there than when we went in — sadly for a lot of people. Dr. Paul would force Congress to declare war before going off to battle. Once war is declared, its a whole different ball game.


198 posted on 11/12/2007 8:45:40 PM PST by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Allegra

Sheesh — I missed that. And I was keeping up with that thread for a while. I’m sure Allegra wasn’t too worried about it though. LOL!


199 posted on 11/12/2007 8:47:46 PM PST by StarCMC (http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2007/08/11/school-of-the-counterpropagandist/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: nsmart

Dr. Alan Keyes was left off the poll as well.

He’s now on the actual ballot in California, Florida, New Hampshire, Georgia, Alabama, Utah, and West Virginia, with more to come.


200 posted on 11/12/2007 8:47:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With "pro-lifers" like these, who needs pro-aborts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson