Pro-Life Advocates Blast Pat Robertson for Rudy Giuliani Endorsement

Life News ^ | 11/8/07 | Steven Ertelt

[LibLieSlayer]

You attended the “clinton school of politics”, didn’t you? What absolute hogwash spun as silk!

LLS

[CharlesWayneCT]

Arguments are more persuasive than assertions.

[Colofornian]

If I let that type of conversation get into my political considerations, I guess I’d be hard-pressed to vote for a Catholic, and likewise a Catholic for an Evangelical. Fortunately, we don’t, or else we’d never elect any religious person.

Can't you & I agree that everybody draws the line somewhere (about the other-worldly or this-worldly commitments of a candidate)? I mean some of us won't vote for a cultist (LDS, JW, or Scientologist). Some of us perhaps wouldn't vote for a Muslim at least for POTUS given the state of terrorism these days. Some of us wouldn't vote for a WICCA witch. Most of us wouldn't vote for a Satanist.

The principle is the same; it's just at different points along the line where somebody draws it.

[Tennessee Nana]

Michael Reagan says it’s all about money...

http://krla870.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2007/11/08/to_pat_robertson_rudy_giuliani_is_the_lesser_of_two_evils

Michael, all I can think of is words from a song...”I’d rather have Jesus than silver or gold...”

[LibLieSlayer]

“Arguments are more persuasive than assertions.”

Observations are more relevant.

LLS

[CharlesWayneCT]

Yes, I can agree on that.

I know I’m biased towards people of the Christian faith.

I know people who won’t vote for a Christian because our beliefs are weird. You’ve probably seen a few around here who won’t vote for someone who believes in creation.

I’m just willing to cut people slack on their personal beliefs, if they seem otherwise sane and have a good conservative message.

I realise that some figure if you can’t get faith right, you can’t be trusted on anything else. Well, I do trust people of my faith more, although they aren’t always trustworthy, and I realise that if we all based our decision on a narrow trust we wouldn’t come together with a majority for any candidate.

But I have to agree that, in both faith and in policy, there is a line over which a candidate will just be so unbelievable that it can’t be overcome.

[TitansAFC]

Keep in mind that many folks, like myself, are waiting to see who proves to be best able to stop Rudy911, and therefore do not have the luxury of a candidate.

If Mitt proves his muster, many will follow.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

[victim soul]

Every candidate who claims to be “personally opposed to abortion” should be asked:

“Why are you personally opposed to abortion?”

[Fred]