Crewmen on the submarine I-8, where Allied prisoners were slaughtered
Posted on 11/03/2007 6:56:30 PM PDT by Stoat
The perpetrators of some of the worst atrocities of the Second World War remain alive and unpunished in Japan, according to a damning new book.
Painstaking research by British historian Mark Felton reveals that the wartime behaviour of the Japanese Navy was far worse than their counterparts in Hitler's Kriegsmarine.
According to Felton, officers of the Imperial Japanese Navy ordered the deliberately sadistic murders of more than 20,000 Allied seamen and countless civilians in cold-blooded defiance of the Geneva Convention.
Scroll down for more...
Crewmen on the submarine I-8, where Allied prisoners were slaughtered
"Many of the Japanese sailors who committed such terrible deeds are still alive today," he said.
"No one and nothing has bothered these men in six decades. There is only one documented case of a German U-boat skipper being responsible for cold-blooded murder of survivors. In the Japanese Imperial Navy, it was official orders."
Felton has compiled a chilling list of atrocities. He said: "The Japanese Navy sank Allied merchant and Red Cross vessels, then murdered survivors floating in the sea or in lifeboats.
"Allied air crew were rescued from the ocean and then tortured to death on the decks of ships.
"Naval landing parties rounded up civilians then raped and massacred them. Some were taken out to sea and fed to sharks. Others were killed by sledge-hammer, bayonet, beheading, hanging, drowning, burying alive, burning or crucifixion.
"I also unearthed details of medical experiments by naval doctors, with prisoners being dissected while still alive."
Felton's research reveals for the first time the full extent of the war crimes committed by the Imperial Japanese Navy, a force that traditionally modelled itself on the Royal Navy. Previously unknown documents suggest that at least 12,500 British sailors and a further 7,500 Australians were butchered.
Felton cites the case of the British merchantman Behar, sunk by the heavy cruiser Tone on March 9, 1944. The Tone's captain Haruo Mayuzumi picked up survivors and, after ten days of captivity below decks, had 85 of them assembled, hands bound, on his ship's stern.
Scroll down for more...
Target: the merchant ship Behar. Its surviving crew were beheaded with swords
Kicked in their stomachs and testicles by the Japanese, they were then, one by one, beheaded with swords and their bodies dumped overboard.
A solitary senior officer, Commander Junsuke Mii, risked his career by dissenting. But he gave evidence at a subsequent war crimes tribunal only under duress. Meanwhile, most of the officers who conducted the execution remained at liberty after the war.
Felton also tells the horrifying story of James Blears, a 21-year-old radio operator and one of several Britons on the Dutch-registered merchant ship Tjisalak, which was torpedoed by the submarine I-8 on March 26, 1944, while sailing from Melbourne to Ceylon with 103 passengers and crew.
Fished from the sea or ordered out of lifeboats, Blears and his fellow survivors were assembled on the sub's foredeck.
From the conning tower, Commander Shinji Uchino issued the ominous order: "Do not look back because that will be too bad for you," Blears recalled.
One by one, the prisoners were shot, decapitated with swords or simply bludgeoned with a sledge-hammer and thrown on to the churning propellers.
Scroll down for more...
Atrocity: The Japanese executing prisoners
According to Blears: "One guy, they cut off his head halfway and let him flop around on the deck. The others I saw, they just lopped them off with one slice and threw them overboard. The Japanese were laughing and one even filmed the whole thing with a cine camera."
Blears waited for his turn, then pulled his hands out of his bindings and dived overboard amid machine-gun fire.
He swam for hours until he found a lifeboat, in which he was joined by two other officers and later an Indian crewman who had escaped alone after 22 of his fellow countrymen had been tied to a rope behind the I-8 and dragged to their deaths as it dived underwater.
Uchino, who was hailed a Japanese hero, ended the war in a senior land-based role and was never brought to trial.
Felton said: "This kind of behaviour was encouraged under a navy order dated March 20, 1943, which read, 'Do not stop at the sinking of enemy ships and cargoes. At the same time carry out the complete destruction of the crews'."
In the months after that order, the submarine I-37 sank four British merchant ships and one armed vessel and, in every case, the survivors were machine-gunned in the sea.
The submarine's commander was sentenced to eight years in prison at a war crimes trial, but was freed three years later when the Japanese government ruled his actions to have been "legal acts of war".
Felton said: "Most disturbing is the Japanese amnesia about their war record and senior politicians' outrageous statements about the war and their rewriting of history.
"The Japanese murdered 30million civilians while "liberating" what it called the Greater East-Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere from colonial rule. About 23million of these were ethnic Chinese.
"It's a crime that in sheer numbers is far greater than the Nazi Holocaust. In Germany, Holocaust denial is a crime. In Japan, it is government policy. But the evidence against the navy – precious little of which you will find in Japan itself – is damning."
The geographical breadth of the navy's crimes, the heinous nature of the acts themselves and the sadistic behaviour of the officers and men concerned are almost unimaginable.
For example, the execution of 312 Australian and Dutch defenders of the Laha Airfield, Java, was ordered by Rear Admiral Koichiro Hatakeyama on February 24 and 25, 1942.
The facts were squeezed out of two Japanese witnesses by Australian army interrogators as there were no Allied survivors.
One of the Japanese sailors described how the first prisoner to be killed, an Australian, was led forward to the edge of a pit, forced to his knees and beheaded with a samurai sword by a Warrant Officer Sasaki, prompting a great cry of admiration from the watching Japanese.
Sasaki dispatched four more prisoners, and then the ordinary sailors came forward one by one to commit murder.
They laughed and joked with each other even when the executions were terribly botched, the victims pushed into the pit with their heads half attached, jerking feebly and moaning.
Hatakeyama was arraigned by the Australians, but died before his trial could begin. Four senior officers were hanged, but a lack of Allied witnesses made prosecuting others very difficult.
Felton said that the Americans were the most assiduous of the Allied powers in collecting evidence of crimes against their servicemen, including those of Surgeon Commander Chisato Ueno and eight staff who were tried and hanged for dissecting an American prisoner while he was alive in the Philippines in 1945.
However, the British authorities lacked the staff, money and resources of the Americans, and the British Labour government was not fully committed to pursuing Japanese war criminals into the Fifties.
• Slaughter At Sea: The Story Of Japan's Naval War Crimes by Mark Felton is published by Pen & Sword on November 20 at £19.99.
Iv’e always called them JAPS.
And the reason we had no more nuclear bombs was that we had to use one to test the Fat Man implosion device to see if it would even work and did not yet have enough weapons grade uranium 235 or plutonium 239 accumulated from our reactors to construct another Little Boy or Fat Man bomb at that time. We had to bluff the Japs.
 |
Asia Pinglist. |
"Maybe I should try that again ~ how about it got worse and children were taught to cower in terror over fear of being blinded by atom bombs going off in their cities ~ all over the world."
(not a very good analogy with actually *being nuked*
While not even close to the same level, you can criticize two (or more) things at once.
And much of the developed world is aware of the heinousness of Japanese atrocities during World War 2; they should push much harder for Japan to own up to it, though.
Germany was originally the target of the first atomic bomb, but they surrendered by the time it was ready.
By that reasoning, you would legitimize much African-descended racism directed at European descendants: paying 'them' back for what 'they' did although in this case 'they' are not 'them;' younger European-descended Americans should not be blamed because their elders were racists.
And almost all Japanese today should not be blamed because their elders were psychotic and butchered people, including civilians, in a despicable manner in the second World War.
The numbers seem about what the common estimates are. East Asia has a huge population (Asia as a continent still has over half the human population, even with large population growth in Africa, and to a lesser extent in Latin America).
This is going to end up a long list of comments, in a row.....
The transfer of diseases is not something either side is usually blamed for in a harshly critical sense. Neither the Europeans nor the Amerindians were aware of how the diseases were passed on. The Europeans did not intend to infect the Amerindians, but they did. Estimates range from about half to a whopping 90+% (extreme range) of the Amerindian population died of diseases brought by the Europeans. Was it the Europeans 'fault?' Technically, it was, but--again--it was accidental. Was it the Amerindians' 'fault' for giving Europe syphilis? Technically, it was, but it was accidental.
The first recorded 'biological warfare' was from American colonists giving Amerindians cloths saturated with smallpox-bearing puss as 'gifts.' And there are probably other diseases which went from the Americas to Europe, but the Macroevolutionary model would suggest that the Americas should have relatively few human-targeting diseases. Africa has the most because in their view Africa has had humans the longest, so diseases could have plenty of time to form varieties to attack humans. Eurasia was the second continent to be colonized, so it should have the second-most number of human diseases (native). Then Australia. And then the Americas. After that, Oceania. While of the opinion that Macroevolution is basically bunk, the evidence seems to support their model. The Amerindian, and to a lesser extent--if only because of less contact--the Pacific Islander populations were decimated upon contact with Old Worlders, almost invariably Europeans/European descendants.
Also, because Eurasia had--and has--the largest population, diseases can more easily spread from human to human in a dense population. The Black Death spread across Eurasia, and around of third of the European population is estimated to have died. So the survivors would be more resistant (because their ancestors may have been--some were lucky enough to live in rural places or not be infected). And Amerindians today are about as resistant to diseases as their European, African, and Asian descended neighbors for the same reason.
Sort of went off on a tangent.....
Anyway, agree with you that racism toward European descendants is often overlooked, and that this is bad not only on a principled level, but also because it breeds resentment and anger--they same for racism toward other groups.
There are plenty of Japanese who know, and are quite embarrassed by the truth of thier nation’s conduct during those years. I know many of them, young and old, that know thier government is full of crap on the issue. They just don’t want to re-live it.My grandfather and his buddies would sympathize, I'm sure -- they weren't particularly interested in living it the first time.
They've asked the remaining crew members of Enola Gay and Bocks Car for apologies every year. They've asked my city (Oak Ridge, Tennessee) for an apology every year.
Speaking for Oak Ridge, Tennessee -
F**K YOU!
Just like they did with the Armenian Genocide right?
THERE.
Dehumanization can be used for various reasons, almost all of them bad--for the user. It can be used by cowards who need to bolster their belief in that their side is in the right. In this case, it hinders the realization that the brutality demonstrated by the Japanese could be done by any nation on this Earth, including the United States. Using the Japanese's European counterpart, the Germans were humans who gave much to Western civilization, from Goethe to Einstein, and yet these human creatures, the same as all other human creatures, including Americans unleashed the World War 2 Holocaust on the world. Evil does come from humans.
And the JAPS point was simply a 'take that' move. On one hand, admire it (hence "THERE"). On the other, take the other view.
The term “Japs” is no different from calling African Americans “N*ger”. I hope you don’t use such a racist term again.
ping
To 'all:' thousands of 'ethnic German' refugees were allowed to starve, get diseases, etc. to death after the fall of Germany.
Aside from some comments about the idiot driver, it dawned on me that once again, a guy could get killed by a Mitsubishi coming out of the sun...
“I don’t know where you learned that, but Germany surrendered in May, 1945, before we had comepleted the construction of ANY nukes. So, it makes no sense that we would have built and designated a nuke to be used against Germany when Germany was already out of the war, don’t you think?”
Bear in mind, making a nucealar weapon took about six years. When they started production it could have been meant for Berlin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.