To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Will MSM finally pay attention to this explosive fact? Ping to Today show list.
2 posted on
11/02/2007 5:19:39 AM PDT by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Eight out of nineteen - that's less than 50%.
Step it up, folks - we can do better than that!
< /sarcasm >
3 posted on
11/02/2007 5:19:51 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
What was their party affiliation?
4 posted on
11/02/2007 5:20:48 AM PDT by
Egon
("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
There is always another side to the story, and such is the case here:
We should allow terrorists to have drivers licenses so that they will be insured. That way, if they get into an accident with an innocent American along the way to a hijacking, the insurance company will pay out.
/sarc
5 posted on
11/02/2007 5:27:57 AM PDT by
C210N
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Amnesty or Driver License....does not matter....
for the demonrats, it's all about illegal votes.
8 posted on
11/02/2007 5:32:50 AM PDT by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk. I Will Be Voting for Mr. Duncan Hunter, fellow FReepers.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
They kill 3,000 innocent people. I merely advocate declaring Martial Law and the National Guard along the Mexican border with a shoot-to-kill order and the Admin thinks I’m the problem! Go figure!
10 posted on
11/02/2007 5:39:15 AM PDT by
Doc Savage
(The tree of liberty needs to be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
14 posted on
11/02/2007 5:50:36 AM PDT by
kabar
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have no problem with states granting a non-citizen Driver’s License to illegal immigrants. But it would have to be visually distinct with “NON-CITIZEN” printed in big, bold letters, and would need text on the back making it clear that the document was to be used for driving purposes only, and not for voting, gaining of additional documentation, or accessing government services as a citizen.
I think this compromise would be acceptable to a broad swath of society. But the Democrats will never go for it, because they are interested in Vote Fraud. That is what this whole business is about for them, nothing more.
18 posted on
11/02/2007 5:59:19 AM PDT by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
21 posted on
11/02/2007 6:11:40 AM PDT by
petercooper
("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
24 posted on
11/02/2007 6:21:28 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(Energy plan: Build refineries and nuke plants, drill for our oil, mine our coal.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
And the Democrats say “For the first time, we agree 9-11 was a tragedy! Kerry could have had those eight votes!”
To: governsleastgovernsbest
No doubt those 8 will be voting for Hussein Obama in the primaries.
34 posted on
11/02/2007 6:58:00 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Scrape the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hubby asked, “What was there party affiliation?”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson