[blam]

GGG Ping.

[2banana]

You mean 7,000 years ago we had global warming too?

[Hoodlum91]

That’s impossible. We’re constantly told that right now is the warmest we’ve ever been.

[Names Ash Housewares]

So the trees grew there when it was much warmer in the past then today obviously.

Oh.

It was natural back then for trees to grow there and no ice?

But... not now?

Got it.

[Clint N. Suhks]

An inconvenient tree stump?

[bigfootbob]

The last paragraph was written by someone worried about future government funding for their chosen field of study.

[TomGuy]

Uhhhh....

If they are finding tree stumps,

that means there were trees at one time,

which means the ice didn’t cover the area,

which means there must have been global warming 7,000 years ago.

==

Those melting glaciers could mess up the current global warming cries.

[ClearCase_guy]

"one has to turn away from natural ones alone to explain this dramatic change of the past 150 years."

Unbelievable. Clearly, a natural process buried these trees in ice. But the reverse process simply MUST be caused by man.

[G-Bear]

If a glacier destroys a forest, and nobody hears it.......

[Blood of Tyrants]

"It seems like an unprecedented change in a short amount of time," Koch said. "From this work and many other studies looking at forcings of the climate system, one has to turn away from natural ones alone to explain this dramatic change of the past 150 years."

He is a globull warming alarmist to the end. While the globull warming 7,000 years ago HAD to have been a natural occurance, there is NO WAY it is THIS time. </sarc>

[DesScorp]

The planet is just naturally switching its temperature, as it does from time to time. Al Gore doesn’t have a damn thing to do with it. We’re coming out of the “little ice age”.

[RightWhale]

one has to turn away from natural ones alone to explain this dramatic change of the past 150 years

The invention of photography, which coincided with the discovery of socialism explains most of the dramatic change.

[colorado tanker]

It’s interesting that all this occurred during the present interglacial. So, after the last glacial max the glaciers retreated enough for a forest to appear, but then marched back down to cover the forest until now. Curious.

[maine-iac7]

There have been many advances and retreats of these glaciers over the past 7,000 years,

The inconvenience of truths....but they're still trying to spin it as being part of the scam -

Makes no never mind what the truth is.

But when alls said and done, I'll take a swing towards a bit of warming before another Little Ice Age - any day.

These scum bags of the Great Swindle have to be stopped - they're after more mega-fund money to carry out some pseudo science that could have disastrous consequences...

IT'S THE SUN!

I vote we send Gore to the sun, post haste, to fix the problem. At the very least, to Mars, whose polar ice cap is melting at a faster rate than ours.

And why are they flocking to the Arctic, where there IS a cyclical melt going on while now ignoring the Antarctic, where there's a new freeze underway?

Rhetorical question -

[Sgt_Schultze]

Melting glaciers in Western Canada are revealing tree stumps up to 7,000 years old where the region's rivers of ice have retreated to a historic minimum,

The evidence of tree stumps invalidates the accuracy of recorded history (which for GW supplicants goes back over 150 years!).

[Red Badger]

....where the region's rivers of ice have retreated to a historic minimum.....

Obviously not...............

[DungeonMaster]

The earth is 6000 years old and before the big flood the atmosphere was much thicker making it like a giant terrarium. So yes, it was much warmer at the poles.

[Tatze]

...where the region's rivers of ice have retreated to a historic minimum...

Well, obviously NOT a historic minimum, if the ice wasnt there back then to have trees growing!

It really is staggering that they still expect us to buy this crap!

[Deaf Smith]

If this is a glacier and not a ice sheet, why weren’t the tree stumps up rooted & ground up? Glaciers flow.

[PeterPrinciple]

Now wait a minute. If they are stumps that means someone cut them off, that means it is Bushes fault.