Posted on 10/21/2007 2:19:55 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
Edited on 10/21/2007 3:12:06 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
We was counting on ya again, Rasta.
Wouldn’t that be great!
I thought Mccain did a good job. Unlike the others, McCain actually knows something about foreign policy instead of simply saying “Reagan good. Islam bad. Very bad.”
Hunter would come close in depth except his trade policy would not only wreck the economy but also create a lot more enemies.
Also, nobody can even touch McCain’s record on cutting pork which puts even Ron Paul to shame.
Giuliani said if the Fox News Dynamics poll were relevant Kerry and Gore would be president.
He kicked Wallace in the balls for using that joke of a poll for anything other than toilet paper.
I paraphrase.
I don’t hate him, I kind of pitty him.
**I actually LIKED McCains comment about what he was doing while hillary clinton was celebrating the music and pharmaceutical festival.**
That he was “tied up”. Literally tied up as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. He got a good amount of applause for that. I thought it was a great line too.
LOL ! This is getting surreal ....
**If you will read about Romney, you’ll quickly find out he’s quite liberal. I couldn’t vote for him.**
Agree with you. I would never vote for him. I was ROTFLOL when he mentioned Catholics. Really pandering for the Catholic vote. He should know better than that.
He will NOT be the Republican nominee. (My prediction!)
LOL, ouch. Thanks for the additional comments. I don’t care for polls much at all.
Hannity just wants a republican to win, any republican, and he thinks Rudy has the best chance of beating hillary. that is all what matters to him.
Hannity is also the kind of guy that would defend every single thing Bush does. He’s a republican loyalist because he thinks criticizing a repub is like giving in to the democrats.
McCain tanking? Good.
I don’t think so either, but I don’t want to dump on people too much. That is an interesting take on the Catholic issue, one that slipped by tonight as I focuse on posting photos for those not able to watch. Thanks for the comments.
I haven’t listened to Hannity in quite awhile, but has he yet explained how he can work to kill the Senate bill, get into a fight with Voinovich/Bush/McCain/Graham over Amnesty, visit the border multiple times, claim to be pro life, critisize the president for the growth of government...then turn around and support an open borders pro choice pro government growth republican when there are other conservative options...and still call himself an intellectually honest conservative?
Sean’s no all bad. But he’s sending out a duel minded message here.
Why would McPain know more about foreign policy than the others ?
Because he sold out to Vietnam with “ free trade “ ?
Actually, not true. Hannity has gone after Bush before. that’s what makes his position on Rudy more difficult to accept. Rudy is worse then Bush on just about every issue, but he critisizes Bush yet carries water for rudy.
Sorry, I missed this comment earlier. I’ll have to admit not catching Goler’s comments this evening. I was trying to get the photos up and it took some of my attention away.
I don’t remember seeing Goler all that often, so I’m not as familiar with him as you are.
One of the things I do like about Fox, is that their leftists aren’t as rabid as say CNNs.
I disagree with Juan Williams all the time, but he’s not your average vicious dem. Even Colmes (a nitwit if every there were one) isn’t the kind of guy I’d like to see hit by a car (for instance). A tandom bicycle perhaps... If I were to say something about Goler, it would probably be along the same lines, not knowing more than I do.
You take care.
Wow - Ron Paul just got resoundingly booed watching the replay here.
Rovian....you are the one poster here who consitently makes me laugh out loud. As soon as I see the John Cox reference, I know it’s you without even looking at the Sig.
Keep smilin’.....and KEEP THE FAITH....
COX/GILMOUR 2008!!!
Hank
The problem with Hunter and Tancredo (not too mention one of Paul’s many problems) is that they’re only Congressmen. If they really want to be President, then they need to get some time as Governors first. I suspect that one problem that both parties are having with the various candidates is that so few of them have executive experience. There’s just way too many Senators and Congressmen running this time around. Not only are they weak on actual executive experience, the experience they do have is heavily waited to what they done inside the Beltway. And that is another huge negative with the general voting population.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.