Skip to comments.
What Would a Ron Paul Presidency Really Be Like?
Posted on 10/20/2007 1:49:17 PM PDT by no nau
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
1
posted on
10/20/2007 1:49:19 PM PDT
by
no nau
To: no nau
What Would a Ron Paul Presidency Really Be Like? It would look like Pelosi's reign! All promises and no votes or support to carry them out.
2
posted on
10/20/2007 1:52:17 PM PDT
by
Bommer
(“He that controls the spice controls the universe!” (unfortunately that spice is Nutmeg!))
To: no nau
Fill your hand you son of a b-—h!
Ha! Ha! I agree with you (maybe not to that extent), but I think I’ll stick around and watch the fireworks!
3
posted on
10/20/2007 1:53:04 PM PDT
by
loreldan
(Without coffee I am nothing.)
To: no nau
Little quiet at the HilaryCare HQ??
Pray for W and Our Troops
4
posted on
10/20/2007 1:53:36 PM PDT
by
bray
(Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
To: no nau
A conservative dream come true. The globalist establishment would be rocked. Multinational corporate interests would be stunned. The elites would be scrambling for their shrinking opportunities to bend the government to their will. The Republic would have a chance to be restored.
5
posted on
10/20/2007 1:56:15 PM PDT
by
Old 300
To: no nau
Ironically, your screenname is "no nau." Paul is the only candidate who has publicly spoken out against this.
6
posted on
10/20/2007 1:58:57 PM PDT
by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on!)
To: no nau
Yea, but drugs would be legal so we could all get stoned....
Luckily, most of the nutty things Paul wants to do would have to originate in congress, not the executive.
7
posted on
10/20/2007 2:01:05 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Who is Chris Peden? http://www.chrispeden.org/)
To: no nau
What Would a Ron Paul Presidency Really Be Like?
All 50 States withdraw from the Federation and Ron Paul would be President of the District of Columbia whereupon the blacks would chase him out.
8
posted on
10/20/2007 2:01:07 PM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Tancredo and Hunter have, as well. Unfortunately they do not grasp how much support they have given the same globalist forces with their backing of the RealID (and other Bill of Rights violating bills) which they have either helped author or have voted enthusiastically for.
9
posted on
10/20/2007 2:01:40 PM PDT
by
Old 300
To: Berlin_Freeper
Do you only get your news from Rupert Murdoch, who has a house in China, and has given the communist government there concessions in order to obtain access to their markets?
10
posted on
10/20/2007 2:02:40 PM PDT
by
Old 300
To: no nau
Believe me, Congress isn’t going to quit that easily.
Seeing that no one is paying the hated income tax, Congress could get it’s act together, abolish the income tax, and institute a national sales tax.
11
posted on
10/20/2007 2:03:09 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; no nau
Now, EEE, you know Paul would just sneak in NAU funding through some back door method that he says he opposes but he knows will pass... just like he did funding for the Trans Texas Corridor (first leg of the NAU highway)
12
posted on
10/20/2007 2:03:39 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Who is Chris Peden? http://www.chrispeden.org/)
To: no nau
I thought Libertarians were for open borders? Did I miss something?
13
posted on
10/20/2007 2:05:25 PM PDT
by
kjo
To: Blood of Tyrants
The sales tax doesn't go far enough, and it tampers with our right to buy and sell without government intervention. The real issue is monetary policy. A large portion of our income taxes (and our sales taxes if they replaced them) go to paying private cartel banks in the Federal Reserve system
interest on money we could have been printing four ourselves.
Ron Paul would strive to eliminate the federal reserve, bring government back to a gold or silver-backed currency that it could not abuse with inflation in order to fund programs it didn't have the cash to support in the first place. Two problems solved at once. Further, he'd abolish the IRS as well.
14
posted on
10/20/2007 2:05:36 PM PDT
by
Old 300
To: no nau
There is no link to this piece. Did you write it?
If you didn't, read no further.
If you did... I don't know whether or not you smoke weed, but I recommend you try the exact opposite!
15
posted on
10/20/2007 2:06:07 PM PDT
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: Old 300
I am Rupert Murdoch and I’m hiding in your house.
16
posted on
10/20/2007 2:06:33 PM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: no nau
17
posted on
10/20/2007 2:07:18 PM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
(No Third Term For Bill Clinton!)
To: Tall_Texan
More vetos than an Italian family reunion.
18
posted on
10/20/2007 2:07:48 PM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
(No Third Term For Bill Clinton!)
To: no nau
19
posted on
10/20/2007 2:08:08 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Want some tea? Let’s talk! I have some advice about this Sean Hannity guy. What’s with his continual coddling of Giuliani?
20
posted on
10/20/2007 2:08:09 PM PDT
by
Old 300
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson