Skip to comments.
Thompson cautions against Clinton obsession
Boston Globe ^
| 10/16/07
| Sue Milligan
Posted on 10/17/2007 8:15:22 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
"we need to figure out what we want to do''
Well Fred, some of us have already figured that out.
1
posted on
10/17/2007 8:15:22 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: pissant
Well, at least McFred showed up, finally.
2
posted on
10/17/2007 8:18:16 AM PDT
by
Nephi
( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
To: Nephi
3
posted on
10/17/2007 8:20:52 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: pissant
4
posted on
10/17/2007 8:20:57 AM PDT
by
traditional1
(GO TRIBE !)
To: pissant
Thompson is exactly right on this .
5
posted on
10/17/2007 8:21:29 AM PDT
by
Neu Pragmatist
(Unite against Rudy ! - Vote Thompson ! - It's the only way to beat Hillary !)
To: traditional1
Speaking of Have nots, did Boston go down the tubes again last night?
6
posted on
10/17/2007 8:22:06 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Neu Pragmatist
Perhaps, but that last sentence is a head scratcher.
7
posted on
10/17/2007 8:22:53 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: traditional1
Most notably Rudy!
With him it is either the boogey-man Hillary or 9/11.
He has nothing else in his bag of tricks.
To: pissant; Politicalmom
I’m sure he said something after that sentence , but the article cut it off there . It was poorly written .
Just another attempt at making Fred sound bad .
9
posted on
10/17/2007 8:27:46 AM PDT
by
Neu Pragmatist
(Unite against Rudy ! - Vote Thompson ! - It's the only way to beat Hillary !)
To: pissant
I took the intention of his comment to mean encouraging Republicans to strategize how best to beat the Democrat running (whether it’s Hillary or someone else).
Even Duncan Hunter needs to do that. Any Republican running for POTUS right now needs to do that.
I know where DH stands on the issues, but I don’t know how he plans on winning.
10
posted on
10/17/2007 8:29:24 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: jdm
By being the most consistent, most straightforward conservative. :o)
11
posted on
10/17/2007 8:30:29 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: pissant
Obsession is exactly right. I can't tell you how many times in these threads we see the single-issue folks wearing Hillary masks saying "boo!" (And no, I'm not talking about selective, choosy pro-life voters; I'm talking about the obsessed anti-Hillary crowd who will vote for anyone who runs against Hillary no matter what they stand for).
To: pissant
Perhaps, but that last sentence is a head scratcher. Could be the author of the article more that what Fred said. Sounds to me like she left out the meaning in the form of the rest of what Fred said as the article ends right there.
Of course it could be her gushing and fawning over Obama...
Obama's star power shows on N.H. visit
Ill. senator tests possible '08 run
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff | December 11, 2006
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Barack Obama , a national political newcomer with an uncomplicated message of hope and promise, won standing ovations from enthusiastic crowds yesterday as he tested the New Hampshire landscape for support for a 2008 Democratic presidential run.
13
posted on
10/17/2007 8:31:47 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: SoConPubbie
With him it is either the boogey-man Hillary or 9/11.Exactly right. Many single-issue RINOS and MSM want to boil down the Republican vote to this.
To: Neu Pragmatist
‘Thompson is exactly right on this .’
Yes, he is.
15
posted on
10/17/2007 8:34:28 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(Free Willie!)
To: Colofornian
Yep.
Clinton Derangement Syndrome is as real as BDS.
16
posted on
10/17/2007 8:35:37 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(Free Willie!)
To: pissant
"...we need to figure out what we want to do"
Well Fred, some of us have already figured that out.
Oh, come on, stop being so shallow. Dig about 1 micron below the surface and the statement reads: "We need to send a positive message to the public about our positions and policies." In other words, instead of trying to drag someone else down, lift yourself up.
I think that Fred has figured out where he stands on the issues, as a quick look at his website will undoubtedly confirm.
To: Colofornian
Obsession is exactly right. I can’t tell you how many times in these threads we see the single-issue folks wearing Hillary masks saying “boo!” (And no, I’m not talking about selective, choosy pro-life voters; I’m talking about the obsessed anti-Hillary crowd who will vote for anyone who runs against Hillary no matter what they stand for).
I agree. There is a BIG difference between being for something and against something. Which raises the question that should unite us. What are we FOR here on FR?
18
posted on
10/17/2007 8:39:38 AM PDT
by
PeterPrinciple
( Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: pissant
” Speaking of Have nots, did Boston go down the tubes again last night? “
Yeah, the Red Sux lost again last night, giving up 7 runs in the fifth inning.
19
posted on
10/17/2007 8:40:09 AM PDT
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Badeye
Clinton Derangement Syndrome is as real as BDS.I compare it to those who see her as Countess Dracula and there's only one stake in the region that the anti-vamps can drive into her heart...a special gold stake that was pulled up from the regional railline. But by using that special stake, the entire national train schedule becomes permanently disrupted. The party can't go anywhere; conduct business. The folks are stuck living in Transylvania.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson