Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prescribe 'the pill' at middle school?
Portland Press Herald ^ | October 16, 2007 | KELLEY BOUCHARD

Posted on 10/16/2007 8:13:38 AM PDT by Abathar

Students who have parental permission to be treated at King Middle School's health center would be able to get birth control prescriptions under a proposal that the Portland School Committee will consider Wednesday.

The proposal would build on the King Student Health Center's practice of providing condoms as part of its reproductive health program since it opened in 2000, said Lisa Belanger, a nurse practitioner who oversees the city's student health centers.

If the committee approves the King proposal, it would be the first middle school in Maine to make a full range of contraception available to some students in grades 6 to 8, said Nancy Birkhimer, director of teen health programs for the Maine Department of Health and Human Services. Most middle schoolers are ages 11-13.

(Excerpt) Read more at pressherald.mainetoday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: contraceptives; indoctrination; maine; moralabsolutes; nannystate; publicschool; publicschools; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Abathar; highimpact
They're sixth graders, of course they know all about STD's and how to identify them, and how condoms will prevent most of them. [/S] for those of you in Rio Lynda

LOL. And being 6th grade children (condoms for 6th graders - yikes!) who forget their homework and leave the water running and lose their cellphones, and on and on, they will surely remember to use condoms responsibly. /s (Not holding breath.)

When my son was a sixth grader, he had (still does) encyclopedic knowledge on cars, how they run, etc., but he wasn't ready to drive one!

41 posted on 10/16/2007 10:29:48 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Finally catching up with posting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

The reality these public schools in low-income areas face, is that they’ve got a huge number of kids from homes where there are no adults who have any objection to their adolescent offspring having sex, having babies, using drugs, etc., and started doing all those things themselves as adolescents. The best the schools can do is try to break the cycle by at least getting the girls through high school without having babies.


42 posted on 10/16/2007 10:31:11 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer; TruthConquers
“...I tried once to tell some moms...They just did not believe me. It is sad that the schools have so much power, and the parents are sooo clueless.”

BEEN THERE! DONE THAT! I don’t know which is more frustrating for me when I am trying to inform others, the “deer in the headlights” look I get or the “you are crazy” look.

Ditto. And the 'I don't want to know/get involved/rock the boat' look.

43 posted on 10/16/2007 10:33:33 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Finally catching up with posting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
This is WITH parental permission. What’s the problem?

None, as long as the parents are paying for the pills and condoms, as well the time of the 'health facilitators', and no taxpayer money is being used. (But I bet that's not the case.)

44 posted on 10/16/2007 10:39:01 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

“The best the schools can do is try to break the cycle by at least getting the girls through high school without having babies.”

The best the schools can do is create an atmosphere where having sex with everyone and anyone is considered beneath a decent girl’s dignity. Why should young girls be encouraged to be whores without pay at that age? How does that help them become adults? It doesn’t. Self respect and some standards will help these children more than the generational sophistry of low expectations of “they’ll just do it anyway,” kind of lies. Not if you teach them better.


45 posted on 10/16/2007 10:42:51 AM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fortunecookie; TruthConquers

“Ditto. And the ‘I don’t want to know/get involved/rock the boat’ look.”

Who can forget the “How do you find the time to stay involved/I don’t have the time/I’m late for soccer practice look.


46 posted on 10/16/2007 11:08:33 AM PDT by 444Flyer (The good Lord gave me one mouth to speak, two ears to hear and 10 fingers to type.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer
“How do you find the time to stay involved/I don’t have the time/I’m late for soccer practice look.

OMG, that is so true! As though soccer is the new religion. And I say this as a soccer fan who put her son in soccer when he was in grade school. Sigh. Or being involved in one's child's life is some big chore to be endure. Double sigh.

47 posted on 10/16/2007 11:54:12 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Finally catching up with posting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

Heck of a lot cheaper for the taxpayers to pay for this, than to pay for babies born to adolescents. In other words, adding BC to this health center’s offerings is a huge net cost savings to the taxpayers.


48 posted on 10/16/2007 12:00:42 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

“The best the schools can do is create an atmosphere where having sex with everyone and anyone is considered beneath a decent girl’s dignity”

This is true, but it shouldn’t be the only thing that a school does. The Pill prevents abortions, that is a fact. To restrict its availability, whatever your motives for doing so, causes abortions.


49 posted on 10/16/2007 12:01:38 PM PDT by 49th (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 49th

There is another possibility to which you fail to give due consideration. Little girls don’t necessarily HAVE to be sex toys.


50 posted on 10/16/2007 12:15:45 PM PDT by LilAngel (FReeping on a cell phone is like making Christmas dinner in an Easy Bake Oven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Heck of a lot cheaper for the taxpayers to pay for this, than to pay for babies born to adolescents.

A quick sterilization would be even cheaper. I'd be willing to foot that bill. ;)

51 posted on 10/16/2007 12:40:02 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; metmom

Schools have no business handing out birth control. I don’t care if they provide healthcare for low income children that otherwise wouldn’t get any, but I think it is ridiculous that they are providing birth control. There is nothing the parents can do about it either. They are stuck between having their child get medical care at school (maybe that’s the only they get at all) and the possibility the school might give their children birth control. Schools should not be providing birth control at all because in doing so they are saying it is ok for the kids to have sex. Why not provide cigarette filters and clean needles because you never what the kids will do? Teach them the value of abstinence and waiting till marriage. They can learn what birth control is, but they sure as heck don’t have to be given it. If the parents want to give it to them outside of school, there’s nothing anyone can do about it. The school sure as heck doesn’t have to give it to them.

At 11 years old, I was still playing with stuffed animals, dolls, and toys. It’s a shame the sex positive agenda seeks to have children sexually active at all ages and the family destroyed. Why can’t we preserve the innocence of children and let kids be kids?


52 posted on 10/16/2007 1:02:55 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 49th
The Pill prevents abortions, that is a fact.

No, that's not a fact.

Firstly, the Pill itself is abortifacient.

Secondly, abortions have not decreased with the availabilty of the Pill.
53 posted on 10/16/2007 3:37:35 PM PDT by Zechariah_8_13 (www.GOOOH.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: highimpact

Top 5 Questions

http://www.orthoevra.com/html/pevr/faq.jsp;jsessionid=20RANRGEA332WCQPCCEDC0YKB2IIWNSC?#two

1 Where can I wear ORTHO EVRA?
You can wear ORTHO EVRA on 1 of 4 areas of the body: upper outer arm, upper torso (front and back, excluding the breasts), abdomen, or buttock. The birth control patch should not be worn on any other areas of the body.

To ensure the effectiveness of ORTHO EVRA, do not place the birth control patch on areas of your skin where makeup, lotions, creams, powders, or other products are or will be applied. In addition, do not place
ORTHO EVRA on skin that is red, irritated, or cut.

2 Are there any risks associated with ORTHO EVRA?

Serious as well as minor side effects have been reported with the use of the Patch.

Serious risks, which can be life threatening, include blood clots, stroke and heart attacks and are increased if you smoke cigarettes.

Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular side effects, especially if you are over 35.
Women who use the Patch are strongly advised not to smoke.

Some women should not use the Patch, including women who have blood clots, certain cancers, a history of heart attack or stroke, as well as those who are or may be pregnant.

Hormones from patches applied to the skin get into the blood stream and are removed from the body differently than hormones from birth control pills taken by mouth.

You will be exposed to about 60% more estrogen if you use ORTHO EVRA than if you use a typical birth control pill containing 35 micrograms (mcg) of estrogen.

In general, increased estrogen exposure may increase the risk of side effects.

The risk of venous thromboembolic disease (blood clots in the legs and/or the lungs) may be increased with ORTHO EVRA compared with that of a birth control pill containing norgestimate and 35 mcg of estrogen. One study found a doubling of this risk and another study found no increased risk.

You should discuss with your healthcare professional whether ORTHO EVRA is a good method of contraception for you.

The Patch does not protect against HIV or sexually transmitted diseases.


54 posted on 10/16/2007 9:16:06 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Birth control Lawsuit Info

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15526078/


55 posted on 10/16/2007 9:23:17 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
My plan is to move to Montana one day but I will never do it as long as they’re in the 9th.

Move away. Montana is not under their jurisdiction.
56 posted on 10/17/2007 6:00:49 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: microgood

I know it is not accurate 100% but:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit

I know there was rumors of dividing the court but I haven’t heard anything lately.


57 posted on 10/19/2007 12:46:33 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson