Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nobel Prize in Medicine Awarded to Three Embryonic Stem Cell Researchers
LifeNews.com ^ | October 8, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 10/08/2007 4:59:42 PM PDT by monomaniac

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
October 8,
2007

Stockholm, Sweden (LifeNews.com) -- Three researchers who work with controversial embryonic stem cells shared the Nobel Prize in medicine on Monday for their role in looking at mouse genes and using their studies to determine the human genes that cause diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

Pro-life advocates oppose embryonic stem cell research on human beings because days-old unborn children must be killed to obtain their cells. They support the use of animal and adult stem cells.

Americans Mario Capecchi and Oliver Smithies and British scientist Sir Martin Evans split the prestigious award and its prize of $1.5 million.

They were honored for a technique called gene targeting which lets scientists identify and alter the genes in mice. It allows them to study how the genes play a role in diseases.
"It's marvelous news both with respect to our laboratory as well as our university," Capecchi told Reuters.

"What we developed is a way of modifying genes in the mouse which allows us to model human diseases, study their pathology as well as ... developing new therapies."

The Nobel prize committed mentioned embryonic stem cell research in their citation to the scientists and said, they had discovered "principles for introducing specific gene modification in mice by the use of embryonic stem cells."

However, the science behind treating humans with embryonic stem cells and the work the scientists did is very different and embryonic stem cell treatments, if they're ever produced, could be decades away because of various problems such as rejection by a patient's immune system.

Adult stem cells have not had those problems and have already treated patients with dozens of diseases and medical conditions.

The scientists have not been without controversy as Capecchi has previously indicated he opposes President Bush's policy of preventing taxpayers from being forced to pay for embryonic stem cell research because it involves the destruction of human life.

"I think stem cell therapy has enormous potential. It's a crime not to actively pursue it," he said," according to AP.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adultstemcell; bush; cancer; diabetes; embryonicstemcell; heartdisease; humanembryo; humanlife; killing; medicine; nobel; nobelprize; presidentbush; prolife; research; science; stemcell; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Alter Kaker

In my experience many academic scientists ARE professional politicians.

Remember the DNA intrigue. Also the MRI shenanigans.


21 posted on 10/10/2007 10:44:02 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
In my experience many academic scientists ARE professional politicians.

You mean like Congressmen Rush Holt (D-NJ) and Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD)? Not too many others out there that I'm aware of.

Remember the DNA intrigue. Also the MRI shenanigans.

I'm going to be honest with you : I have no idea what you're talking about.

22 posted on 10/10/2007 10:59:16 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Remember the DNA intrigue. Also the MRI shenanigans.

If you're talking about the 2003 Physiology or Med Nobel mess involving Raymond Damadian, that's just academic politics, which has really no obvious connection to electoral politics.

If you're talking about Rosalind Franklin, w/regard to the awarding of the 1962 prize in Phys or Med, there are actually some very sound reasons she didn't get the prize, although I'm not sure if that's what you're referring.

23 posted on 10/10/2007 11:06:05 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

“In my experience many academic scientists ARE professional politicians.

Remember the DNA intrigue. Also the MRI shenanigans.”


Perhaps you might want to take a look at who has won Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Physiology/Medicine and the research that was awarded the prizes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Chemistry#Laureates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physiology_or_Medicine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics


24 posted on 10/10/2007 11:06:09 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson