Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers Explain Why Having Baby Reduces Breast Cancer Chances
LifeNews.com ^ | October 2, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 10/07/2007 9:01:50 PM PDT by monomaniac

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
October 2,
2007

Seattle, WA (LifeNews.com) -- Researchers at a cancer center in Seattle have confirmed what previous studies have shown: women who bear children have a reduced risk of developing breast cancer. They say fetal cells “transplanted” to the mother before birth are a source of this protective effect. That's something that abortion denies.

Scientists at the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center presented their results in the October 1 issue of Cancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

They studied a concept called fetal microchimerism, which is the ability of cells from a growing unborn baby to take up long-term residence in the mother's body.

Vijayakrishna K. Gadi, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor at the University of Washington and research associate at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, discussed the findings in a statement LifeNews.com obtained.

"Our research found that these persisting fetal cells may be giving a woman an edge against developing breast cancer,” he said. “This experiment of nature is all the more fascinating because for years doctors treated a number of different cancers by transplanting cells from one person to another."

Fetal microchimerism has been implicated as a mechanism of autoimmune disease but it may also benefit mothers by putting the immune system on alert for malignant cells to destroy.

The researchers recruited 82 women, 35 of whom had been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Approximately two-thirds of the women studied have had children, and more than half of the participants had given birth to at least one son. That's important because the scientists examined whether any of the women had the male Y chromosome among female cells in a blood sample.

Among the women with breast cancer, only five had male DNA in their bloodstream.

Three of the five previously gave birth to sons, one had had an abortion and the other had never been knowingly pregnant.

In total, about 14 percent of all women in the breast cancer group had male DNA in their bloodstream compared to 43 percent of women in the non-breast cancer group.

According to Dr. Gadi, these findings could provide a starting point for future research on the role of fetal microchimerism in the prevention of cancer.

And pro-life groups say the findings show women should be encouraged to have children instead of having abortions as it helps protect them from contracting breast cancer.




TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: abclink; abortion; autoimmune; breastcancer; cancer; childbearing; children; fetalcells; fetalmicrochimerism; havingchildren; pregnancy; pregnant; prolife; seattle

1 posted on 10/07/2007 9:01:53 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Sounds like a clear case of “reaping what you sow”.


2 posted on 10/07/2007 9:26:28 PM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

some are making a relationship between abortion & breast cancer.
if a woman has an abortion, then has a baby later...now what ?

looks like another research grant is in order <*S off>


3 posted on 10/07/2007 9:40:59 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Time magazine has a cover story this week about how breast cancer is spreading all over the world. They give various weak explanations but don’t ever mention that the spread of breast cancer over the world exactly mirrors the spread of Govt. or NGO funded abortions. The two phenomena mirror each other exactly.


4 posted on 10/07/2007 9:44:12 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

We’ve known this for 32 years.


5 posted on 10/07/2007 9:52:38 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
Time magazine has a cover story this week about how breast cancer is spreading all over the world. They give various weak explanations but don’t ever mention that the spread of breast cancer over the world exactly mirrors the spread of Govt. or NGO funded abortions. The two phenomena mirror each other exactly.

Well, if this study is correct, than not having a baby in first place also denies a woman this protection against breast cancer. If fewer women are getting pregnant, then there would be fewer breast cancer cases. But I don't think anyone is going to be blaming abstinence programs for breast cancer.

6 posted on 10/08/2007 7:10:00 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

It has been known for years that being childless increased the risk of breast cancer...

Late child bearing also does..


7 posted on 10/08/2007 8:47:52 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Unborn Children May "Cure" Mothers' Diseases Via Fetal Stem Cells

8 posted on 12/02/2007 10:05:41 PM PST by Coleus (Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson