Posted on 10/06/2007 6:10:56 PM PDT by jdm
Moqtada al-Sadr has signed an agreement with his Shi'ite rivals in southern Iraq to end all hostilities between them. The Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, which recently signed a peace agreement with the central government and the Kurds, has now managed to put Sadr into its coalition, ending years of conflict between the Mahdi Army and the Badr Brigades:
Two of Iraq's most influential Shia leaders have signed a deal to try to end violence between their groups.
Radical cleric Moqtada Sadr and Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, head of the Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq, have been locked in a bitter dispute for months.
The leaders have agreed to try to end further bloodshed, foster a spirit of good will and form joint committees throughout the country.
The SIIC stated that the various factions of Iraq had to find ways to come together to "enhance and preserve Iraqi unity." Sadr's spokesman said that the pact would become a "commitment of honor." Both sides want to find ways to end the squabbling that has existed between the groups since liberation, but which have recently created a rising amount of violence.
Sadr appears to have capitulated to the SIIC in this instance. Over the summer, his Mahdi Army started a gunfight with the Badr Brigades during a Shi'ite holiday and pilgrimage, killing dozens. Shortly afterwards, Hakim outmaneuvered Sadr with an alliance between the SIIC, Nouri al-Maliki, and the Kurds. The alliance strengthened Maliki after Sadr withdrew his deputies from Maliki's ruling coalition, leaving Sadr more isolated than ever before, even among Shi'ites.
Sadr is a survivor, as we have learned over the last four years. He knows when to hold 'em, and he knows when to fold 'em. It looks like he's made another pragmatic calculation, but even Sadr can't hide the fact that he's taking his faction ever backwards. At one time, he played kingmaker to Maliki. Now he has to fight for scraps from Hakim's table and only has indirect influence over the government. Surviving may be a form of success, but Sadr could have played his hand so much more effectively -- and it won't be long before his underlings start to realize it, if they haven't already.
Just reloading.
We will see. At least I didn't see him referred to as the "firebrand cleric." That was a pleasant change. But this guy is fat, ugly, and pure evil. We shall see.
And, now, Mookie has joined the party and laid down his arms.
Where's this "civil war" that the MSM has been promoting...???
He didn't return to Iraq until 2004.
When an Arab signs an agreement...it truly stops them...it’s one thing to say a thing [cause in that part of the world lying is a way of life] but a whole nother thing when they sign on the dotted line.
ROP members don’t “capitulate”; they drop back ten and punt, so to speak. He wants to be the next leader of Iraq; he obviously has something up his sleeve, just needs a little breathing room. Wouldn’t trust him with your camel.
Just remember this isn’t a success if the MSM refuses to acknowledge it.
Good news is no news.
Yeah, wasn’t he made a government minister last time he “made peace?”
Correction 2003 after Iraq fell.
I don’t know what the agreement was written on, but toilet paper is worth more.
Is it the same if they are really a Persian ? What about agreements with infidels , or if the writing was composed in the infidel written language ?
Until the advantage comes back their way. There is not one signed agreement in the history of Islam that they have ever kept. If it is advantages to “allah”, they will break a treaty, signed agreement or oath with, apparently, full approval of their moon god.
i think he’s been promoted to start the iraqi hezbollah franchise ... he’ll be back with murder on his mind, i think
The capture and releases have been driving me nuts for a while now. This is the first I have heard about JAG getting in the way but these days that doesn't surprise me a bit.
That is my info also , and previous snafus involving spooks being given limited rules of engagement , all to the disadvantage of our guys .
We will and should be present in Iraq as long as we have been present in Germany, Japan and South Korea, if peace and properity for the region are our goals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.