Posted on 10/05/2007 4:24:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
E-mail/ping me if you want on/off the list! SPREAD THE WORD!!!
What’s a few million babies between fellow Republicans, eh? Damn those Christians!....won’t sacrifice everything they believe in to be good little loyal Republicans no matter what!
Yes, that looks like a sure sign of no conservative values to me.
Exactly!
No major political party in American History has KNOWINGLY nominated a candidate for president who they knew couldn't even win their home state (the 'Rats had no reason to think that Algore couldn't carry Tennessee in 2000 since BJ Klintoon won it both times).
A conservative with a conscience protesting the nominee by failing to vote for the Republican in an election where the Democrat wins has effectively voted for the Democrat. Anyone remember 1992 and 1996?
How can anyone speaking of being true to their conscience not vote for the best choice of two, even if the best choice is not perfect, or is even far from perfect?
The primaries are the place for selecting the best standard bearers. Opinions on who's best will vary. My first choice in 1980 was not Reagan -- I wanted Phil Crane. My first choice in 1988 was not Bush -- I wanted Kemp.
As a Republican, I chose to support the Republican party's nominee, because no Democrat is an electoral option for a conservative with a CONSCIENCE.
Make the choice to support the most conservative choice of the two electable choices, and do so as matter of damage control if for no other reason.
A vote cast on that basis should give any one with a good conscience a clear conscience -- that is if the person really cares about electoral outcomes, and Supreme Court appointments to be making something more than just a self-righteous statement about themselves.
The stakes are higher than any single issue.
We're on the team fighting for conservatism. We may not always like the quarterback, but we will be certain to make no touch downs if we choose to play tepidly or simply decide to just walk off the field.
No, he just doesn't want to see a liberal in the White House, like most of us he realizes that there is ZERO difference between Rooty Toot and Hitlery (other than the fact that Rooty is more comfortable wearing a dress).
I know what James Dobson’s principles are, but what are yours?
Dobson seems to have forgotten about small steps leading to a larger goal.
We don’t have to resign ourselves to Giuliani at this point or even into the next coming months. There are better options clearly available to us.
“Of course, a truly prolife conservative must be on the correct side of the immigration debate as well to get our vote.
Of course, the answer is DUNCAN HUNTER!!
But why is ANY LIBERAL an option?
The stakes are higher than any single issue.
You're right, and Rooty Toot is the biggest single issue candidate since William Henry Harrison back in 1840.
Which one is which?
You said it!
Rudy began calling himself "Julie Annie" when he began running with a "sexually liberal" crowd.
We have to face the fact that unlike with Reagan or George W. Bush, no electable, historically pro-life candidate has emerged in our Republican line-up at this time.
If this line up is our choice we must face the fact that we must select the best, and most electable one we do have.
I gave this football analogy on another thread:
We're on the team fighting for conservatism. We may not always like the quarterback, but we will be certain to make no touch downs if we choose to play tepidly or simply decide to just walk off the field.
I kept telling people way back before there was anything but a rumor that Rudy might run, that the Republican party couldn't possibly be that stupid or suicidal to nominate not just some liberal who is unable to even guarantee his home state, but also is from the SAME home state as the candidate from the opposing party.
Just shows that it doesn't pay to overestimate the intelligence or will to survive of the Republican party.
When they get into the actual campaign, any Democratic candidate would start immediately telling his soft money friends to show wife 1, wife 2....abused, misused, cheated on, abandoned, emotionally attacked and left out to dry.
And if someone someplace thinks it won’t happen, then they’re nuts.
And, as odd as it sounds, here comes Hillary to the Patsy Cline tune: “Stand by Your Man.” She’ll be Mrs Family of the Year.
And compared to Giuliani she will pull it off.
.
James Dobson on Hannity today:
A creepy liar -
A bought & paid for sleeper sellout
I*ll be reviewing him and his “Council” and taking some down hard
He does not care if Hillary and Slick Willie pollute the White House for 8 more years
He pans Rudy, McCain, Fred, and was cagey about Romney
“There are ‘others’ out there!” Dobson proclaimed
I use and nifty gizmo that monitors and records voices
Dobson is a pathetic liar with the same patterns as the Klintoons exposed when he speaks
The Israelis are tops in voice analyzing tech as few know
Do not forget that one of these “leaders” invited Hussein “Flag” O*Bomber to speak to his flock
James Dobson:
Phoney Christian
Phoney American
Phoney Patriot
Paid-Off Pansy
Genuine Egotist
What I care about is winning the war against the jihad...and I suspect social conservatives could place that at risk over "principle".
There are far higher issues at stake than whether a candidate supports the FMA...or personally is pro-life or pro-death.
The survival of our civilization is at stake and those like Dobson are willing to let it burn over "principle".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.